>>We are test driving the Netscape-Communications/1.1
>>server (SunOS 4.1.3) but the logging makes it hard
>>to evaluate problems with aborted or timed out connections.
>What kind of problems are you seeing? You might want to use sitemon or a more
>appropriate tool besides logging to diagnose such problems.
I suspect they are user, not server, problems judging from the
logs on the NCSA httpd 1.3 server we were running.
There are popular pages with large audio files (1MB and 5MB).
Although the sizes are clearly marked, it appears
some users balk during big transfers: sometimes there
are one or more successive transfers of 50KB or so,
sometimes followed by a successful transfer and sometimes
not.
The NS-Comm/1.1 logs don't show this and in fact made
the server throughput look much, much higher than it was
because they record 5 MB even if only 0.05 MB is transferred.
I checked that CERN 3.0 does this too but didn't find
a clear spec. Maybe NCSA http was being unconventional.
What's the right answer?
In any event, the actual bytes transferred is a
helpful number; the file size I already know ;-)
<snip>
Quote:>In general the information in log files should not be taken too heavily. For
>instance, if I have a file that is 32K, under IRIX the default TCP buffer size
>is 61K. That means that the HTTP server will think the entire file was sent
>before the kernel ever actually started sending data (and detected the abort).
That's fine. However, knowing even the order of magnitude
with NCSA httpd has been helpful in deciphering usage
patterns, organizing content and in estimating
network impact.
Since the NS server seems quite faster than NCSA httpd 1.3,
it would have been interesting to see if users noticed
enough to balk less often.
Paul Mende