3.1 stable / 3.1 release

3.1 stable / 3.1 release

Post by A.G. » Tue, 23 Mar 1999 04:00:00



Are they both elf-standard? I'm looking into installing FreeBSD... Which
version should I get? How "unstable" is "release"?

Thanx,
Arcady

 
 
 

3.1 stable / 3.1 release

Post by DrBoo » Tue, 23 Mar 1999 04:00:00


Both are ELF-ish, and 3.1-Release is probably what you want.

In order of cutting-edgeness, it goes like this:

Release ----> Stable ----> Current

See http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/handbook267.html#587 for more
information on this subject.

-j


> Are they both elf-standard? I'm looking into installing FreeBSD... Which
> version should I get? How "unstable" is "release"?

> Thanx,
> Arcady


 
 
 

1. FreeBSD 3.1 RELEASE to snapshot 3.1 STABLE question

Hi.

Is there any problem with upgrading to snapshot 3.1STABLE of mars25 for
example.

I would download the binary /bin dist. and go in single user mode and do
sh ./install.sh from a tmp directory.

After I would install the rest of the distribution.

Or should I go with the source, and still go to single user mode.

My system is setup ok, so I would like the install to not mess anything.

Thank You
Jean

2. HELP

3. Cant find errno.h while upgrading 3.1-stable (to 3.1-stable)

4. Alias recognized but ignored by bash script

5. SSHD crashed FreeBSD hot 3.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 3.1-RELEASE #1

6. Real-time VME interface

7. StarOffice 3.1 problem w/ 3.1-RELEASE

8. bos.adt.include

9. Pb with 3.1-RELEASE -> STABLE update

10. 3.1-RELEASE, STABLE & CURRENT Boot Disk Problems.

11. CVSup Update from 3.1-RELEASE to 3.2-STABLE

12. Necessary to go to 3.1.2G is 3.1.2F works fine?

13. Installed 3.1. Have questions (not only about 3.1)