When is 2.2R due out?

When is 2.2R due out?

Post by Andreas Kle » Sun, 19 May 1996 04:00:00





Quote:>Well,the earlier query said that 2.2 was already due out by the end of this
>summer(Septemberish)...it's been almost six months since 2.1R hit the FTP
>sites,so if there is an every-six-months frequency,one would expect 2.1.1
>to be imminent,and 2.2 not to be with us until near year-end...

Louis, if you are impatient, then subscribe to the FreeBSD 2.2
snap release CD, that gives you access to the full CVS repository.
The latest is just out. The CD ships immediately after your
order via WWW.

After that you are able to checkout the -current tree and
to setup your system to receive CVS repository updates via
e-mail on a daily basis. So you can get day for day new
wonderful changes and you are directly on the way to 2.2.0.

So do I and I'm very satisfied with this method. Doing a
make world every now and then updates your OS to the newest
release.

        Andreas ///

--


pgp p-key  http://www-swiss.ai.mit.edu/~bal/pks-toplev.html  >>> powered by <<<
ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/system/Printing/aps-491.tgz  >>>    FreeBSD <<<

 
 
 

When is 2.2R due out?

Post by Louis Epste » Sun, 19 May 1996 04:00:00




:
: >Well,the earlier query said that 2.2 was already due out by the end of this
: >summer(Septemberish)...it's been almost six months since 2.1R hit the FTP
: >sites,so if there is an every-six-months frequency,one would expect 2.1.1
: >to be imminent,and 2.2 not to be with us until near year-end...
:
: Louis, if you are impatient, then subscribe to the FreeBSD 2.2
: snap release CD, that gives you access to the full CVS repository.
: The latest is just out. The CD ships immediately after your
: order via WWW.

Not particularly impatient,just looking to understand the schedule.
I run an ISP and want things with their kinks worked out,so am more
concerned with 2.1.1's apparent slippage.

(I just got the promo on SNAP CD subscriptions today...)

: After that you are able to checkout the -current tree and
: to setup your system to receive CVS repository updates via
: e-mail on a daily basis. So you can get day for day new
: wonderful changes and you are directly on the way to 2.2.0.
:
: So do I and I'm very satisfied with this method. Doing a
: make world every now and then updates your OS to the newest
: release.

But doesn't this lose you your own recompiles?
I've enabled 12-character UserIDs on my system,
wouldn't want the default 8 coming back every
time.I expect my upgrades to be stable release
versions.

 
 
 

When is 2.2R due out?

Post by Chris Mauri » Sun, 19 May 1996 04:00:00





: :
: : >Well,the earlier query said that 2.2 was already due out by the end of this
: : >summer(Septemberish)...it's been almost six months since 2.1R hit the FTP
: : >sites,so if there is an every-six-months frequency,one would expect 2.1.1
: : >to be imminent,and 2.2 not to be with us until near year-end...
: :
: : Louis, if you are impatient, then subscribe to the FreeBSD 2.2
: : snap release CD, that gives you access to the full CVS repository.
: : The latest is just out. The CD ships immediately after your
: : order via WWW.
:
: Not particularly impatient,just looking to understand the schedule.

Understandable.

: I run an ISP and want things with their kinks worked out,so am more
: concerned with 2.1.1's apparent slippage.

You get what you pay for.  :)

: (I just got the promo on SNAP CD subscriptions today...)
:  
: : After that you are able to checkout the -current tree and
: : to setup your system to receive CVS repository updates via
: : e-mail on a daily basis. So you can get day for day new
: : wonderful changes and you are directly on the way to 2.2.0.
: :
: : So do I and I'm very satisfied with this method. Doing a
: : make world every now and then updates your OS to the newest
: : release.
:
: But doesn't this lose you your own recompiles?
: I've enabled 12-character UserIDs on my system,
: wouldn't want the default 8 coming back every
: time.I expect my upgrades to be stable release
: versions.

Stable upgrades?  Then you might want to get BSD/OS
and a support contract.  :-)

Chris

--
Christopher Mauritz         | For info on internet access:

Mordor International        | http://www.mordor.com/
201/212/718 internet access | Modem: (201)433-7343,(212)843-3451

 
 
 

When is 2.2R due out?

Post by J Wuns » Mon, 20 May 1996 04:00:00



> : So do I and I'm very satisfied with this method. Doing a
> : make world every now and then updates your OS to the newest
> : release.

> But doesn't this lose you your own recompiles?
> I've enabled 12-character UserIDs on my system,
> wouldn't want the default 8 coming back every
> time.I expect my upgrades to be stable release
> versions.

You can get the CVS tree, and update your /usr/src from there.  CVS
knows about local modifications, and keeps them.  Of course, you risk
that it once might conflict with a CVS-imported modification, CVS
notifies you about this by a `C' flag in the cvs import message.  In
your case, this is only likely to happen in case FreeBSD decides to
bump the UserID limit itself.

Since you are interested in -stable, you have to run

cd /usr/src
cvs -q update -r RELENG_2_1_0 -Pd
              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^_______ that's the tag for the -stable branch

This has the added benefit that you've also got the current
development tree handy as well.  If you wanna know about the latest
and greatest disklabel program, you can e.g.:

cd /tmp
cvs co disklabel
<examine it...>
rm -rf disklabel

If you've seen a particular interesting commit message on the commit
mailing list, with a long overdue bug fix mentioned, you can even try
the fix before somebody was convinced enough that this one should also
go into -stable.

The only drawback is apparent: about 200 MB disk space for the CVS
tree.

--
cheers, J"org


Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)

 
 
 

When is 2.2R due out?

Post by Ken Bigelo » Thu, 23 May 1996 04:00:00



> But doesn't this lose you your own recompiles?
> I've enabled 12-character UserIDs on my system,
> wouldn't want the default 8 coming back every
> time.I expect my upgrades to be stable release
> versions.

All right, I don't mind admitting I'm relatively new to both Unix and to
FreeBSD. Could you please enlighten me on how you extended UserIDs to
more than 8 characters? I found the check in the adduser program, but
even when I changed that it didn't work right. What else do I need to do,
pray tell?

I'm starting a new FreeBSD-powered WebSite and would like to be able to
bypass this limit.

Thanks much,

Ken

 
 
 

When is 2.2R due out?

Post by James Rayna » Fri, 24 May 1996 04:00:00




Quote:

>All right, I don't mind admitting I'm relatively new to both Unix and to
>FreeBSD. Could you please enlighten me on how you extended UserIDs to
>more than 8 characters? I found the check in the adduser program, but
>even when I changed that it didn't work right. What else do I need to do,
>pray tell?

It's not that easy, unfortunately. It's a system-wide limit that's
compiled in when the system is built and you have to re-compile
everything to change it.

If you want to do this, you'll need the whole of the src distribution
(not just the kernel) and change the line in /usr/include/utmp.h which
says

#define     UT_NAMESIZE     8

Then do 'make world' in /usr/src, build a new kernel and reboot.

(NB the limit is set at 8 to be compatible with NIS. If you increase
it, you won't be able to use NIS any more. If you don't know what that
means, you probably aren't using it 8-)

Quote:>I'm starting a new FreeBSD-powered WebSite and would like to be able to
>bypass this limit.

If you just want to do this to get long usernames in email addresses,
a much simpler way is to set up mail aliases. For example, if you use
sendmail, adding a line in /etc/aliases like

averylongusernameindeed: someone

and doing 'mkaliases' will result in mail addressed to
'averylongusernameindeed' being sent to someone's mailbox instead.

--
James Raynard, Edinburgh, Scotland


 
 
 

When is 2.2R due out?

Post by Terry Lamber » Fri, 24 May 1996 04:00:00


] > But doesn't this lose you your own recompiles?
] > I've enabled 12-character UserIDs on my system,
] > wouldn't want the default 8 coming back every
] > time.I expect my upgrades to be stable release
] > versions.
]
] All right, I don't mind admitting I'm relatively new to both
] Unix and to FreeBSD. Could you please enlighten me on how you
] extended UserIDs to more than 8 characters? I found the check
] in the adduser program, but even when I changed that it didn't
] work right. What else do I need to do, pray tell?
]
] I'm starting a new FreeBSD-powered WebSite and would like to
] be able to bypass this limit.

This is in the FAQ and in the handbook.

You do it by changing a header file and recompiling everything
that uses hte constant.

When you do this, you break NIS interoperability; basically, you
can kiss it goodbye.  This is an inherenet limit in NIS that can't
change without changing the wire protocol.

Without NIS, you can pretty much kiss NFS goodbye.

Are you sure you want to do this?  If so, go to www.freebsd.org
and look up the FAQ entry.  It's not something I'd like to see
become popular.  8-(.

                                        Terry Lambert

---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.

 
 
 

When is 2.2R due out?

Post by Ken Bigelo » Sat, 25 May 1996 04:00:00





> >All right, I don't mind admitting I'm relatively new to both Unix and to
> >FreeBSD. Could you please enlighten me on how you extended UserIDs to
> >more than 8 characters? I found the check in the adduser program, but
> >even when I changed that it didn't work right. What else do I need to do,
> >pray tell?

> It's not that easy, unfortunately. It's a system-wide limit that's
> compiled in when the system is built and you have to re-compile
> everything to change it.

> If you want to do this, you'll need the whole of the src distribution
> (not just the kernel) and change the line in /usr/include/utmp.h which
> says

> #define     UT_NAMESIZE     8

> Then do 'make world' in /usr/src, build a new kernel and reboot.

Thanks. I got most of this from another kind soul, found the entry, and
started recompiling those elements that use it. I found that most of the
utilities that use this have their sources in /usr/src/usr.bin , so when
I kept stumbling over more such utilities, I tried to 'make' this whole
group, but got caught by an error since tn3270/mset/mset.c wasn't there.
Perhaps the 'make world' approach will bypass this; I'll certainly try
it, and thanks.

Quote:

> (NB the limit is set at 8 to be compatible with NIS. If you increase
> it, you won't be able to use NIS any more. If you don't know what that
> means, you probably aren't using it 8-)

No, I'm definitely not using it and have no plans to.

Quote:

> >I'm starting a new FreeBSD-powered WebSite and would like to be able to
> >bypass this limit.

> If you just want to do this to get long usernames in email addresses,
> a much simpler way is to set up mail aliases. For example, if you use
> sendmail, adding a line in /etc/aliases like

> averylongusernameindeed: someone

> and doing 'mkaliases' will result in mail addressed to
> 'averylongusernameindeed' being sent to someone's mailbox instead.

Actually, I'm using qpop, which is the POP3 mail handler supplied as a
package for FBSD. I also use popclient to suck email from other sites
where I have accounts (which will eventually expire), and put it all here
where I can reasd it from one place. I'll look into aliasing, but I think
I'm really going to want at least 10-character UserIDs, and 12 is
apparently reasonable without too much trouble in FBSD.

Thanks again for the info!

Ken

 
 
 

When is 2.2R due out?

Post by James Rayna » Sun, 26 May 1996 04:00:00




>If you want to do this, you'll need the whole of the src distribution
>(not just the kernel) and change the line in /usr/include/utmp.h which

Oops, that should have been /usr/src/include/utmp.h

Sorry.

--
James Raynard, Edinburgh, Scotland