/kernel: in_rtqtimo: adjusted rtq_reallyold to 2400

/kernel: in_rtqtimo: adjusted rtq_reallyold to 2400

Post by Michelle Brownswor » Tue, 15 Apr 1997 04:00:00



That's the first cryptic message that appears on the console and in
/var/log/messages, and others follow with decreasing values.  This kernel
message is obviously an advisory that something is amiss, in the kernel's
opinion, making it necessary to do an adjustment to compensate, since the
dunderhead system administrator hasn't done it.

I seem to recall that in_rtqtimo is a function in the routing table
routines, but I can't put my hands on anything that will shed some light
on what's wrong, and what I need to do to correct it.

Anyone having a handle on this esoterica who could point me in the right
direction would receive a heaping helping of appreciation.

.\\ichelle
---------------------
Michelle Brownsworth
System Administrator
PrimeLogic Communications, Inc.

 
 
 

/kernel: in_rtqtimo: adjusted rtq_reallyold to 2400

Post by Nick Hillia » Wed, 16 Apr 1997 04:00:00



: That's the first cryptic message that appears on the console and in
: /var/log/messages, and others follow with decreasing values.  This kernel
: message is obviously an advisory that something is amiss, in the kernel's
: opinion, making it necessary to do an adjustment to compensate, since the
: dunderhead system administrator hasn't done it.

Naah, nothing so conspiratorial.  The message is just to let you know what's
happening with the routing table timers.  The warning was removed after
2.1.0, to stop people thinking that their system was broken.

You can safely ignore the messages.

Nick

 
 
 

/kernel: in_rtqtimo: adjusted rtq_reallyold to 2400

Post by Tony Griffith » Fri, 18 Apr 1997 04:00:00



> That's the first cryptic message that appears on the console and in
> /var/log/messages, and others follow with decreasing values.  This kernel
> message is obviously an advisory that something is amiss, in the kernel's
> opinion, making it necessary to do an adjustment to compensate, since the
> dunderhead system administrator hasn't done it.

OK, you made me curious enough to go and take a peek at the code.  This
message originates from module ".../netinet/in_rmx.c" routine

Essentially, it appears to be trying to flush the routing cache of stale
entries (ie. those that have been there for 'rtq_reallyold' seconds but
havn't been used!).

Quote:

> I seem to recall that in_rtqtimo is a function in the routing table
> routines, but I can't put my hands on anything that will shed some light
> on what's wrong, and what I need to do to correct it.

Nothing...  It's simply an advisory that the value of rtq_reallyold is
being reduced by 1/3 of it's current value.  It starts at 60 * 60 (3600
seconds) so the first reduction reduces it to 2400 seconds and the next
to 1600, etc.  I believe that it keeps doing this until it reaches the
minimum value which is 10 seconds.  The idea is to keep the routing
cache to 128 entries or less.  If no entries are being flushed, then the
value of rtq_reallyold keeps getting reduced to try and force the issue!

Quote:

> Anyone having a handle on this esoterica who could point me in the right
> direction would receive a heaping helping of appreciation.

My advise is...  "DON'T PANIC!"  I've been ignoring this message for
several years now and nothing untoward has happened to my routing
tables.  Now that I've read the code, I can sleep even easier at night.
;-)

Regards,
Tony

 
 
 

/kernel: in_rtqtimo: adjusted rtq_reallyold to 2400

Post by igor vladimirovich roshch » Sat, 19 Apr 1997 04:00:00



: : That's the first cryptic message that appears on the console and in
: : /var/log/messages, and others follow with decreasing values.  This kernel
: : message is obviously an advisory that something is amiss, in the kernel's
: : opinion, making it necessary to do an adjustment to compensate, since the
: : dunderhead system administrator hasn't done it.
:
: Naah, nothing so conspiratorial.  The message is just to let you know what's
: happening with the routing table timers.  The warning was removed after
: 2.1.0, to stop people thinking that their system was broken.

Doesn't seem to be true.
I see it on 2.1.5 - 2.1.7

:
: You can safely ignore the messages.

AGREE

IgoR

 
 
 

1. /kernel: in_rtqtimo: adjusted rtq_reallyold to 710

Hi,

Anyone have an explanation for:

/kernel: in_rtqtimo: adjusted rtq_reallyold to 710

From the syslogs?

Thanks!

[Or, how about "The Complete Guide to Kernel and Associated Errors"?]

--

iphil communications, makati city, philippines           http://www.iphil.net

2. ** NFS: uid permissions come up wrong **

3. What is "in_rtqtimo: adjusted rtq_reallyold to ..." ???

4. What computers does data pass through?

5. Kernel messages - adjusted rtq_reallyold to ...

6. netscape webserver

7. NEC Versa 2400 kernel recompile

8. sendto not blocking

9. DELL PowerEdge 2400 and SMP kernel

10. NEC Versa 2400 kernel recompile

11. R These Good To Run Linux: Shuttle AK-32A + Athlon XP 2400+ for US$130?

12. serial ports, DIP: why can't I get > 2400 baud?