FreeBSD (current) good for Laptops?

FreeBSD (current) good for Laptops?

Post by Peter Mutsaer » Wed, 13 Nov 1996 04:00:00



Hello,

I just bought a Laptop and want to put Unix on it.

I heard some people say that Linux has better support for Laptop
specific things (what support exactly is needed? PCMCIA? Power saving
mode?)

Is this really true? I would really prefer FreeBSD but wonder what
problems/deficiencies I might encounter.

Thanks in advance,

--
Peter Mutsaers  |  Abcoude (Utrecht), |  Trust is a good quality

--
Peter Mutsaers  |  Abcoude (Utrecht), |  Trust is a good quality

 
 
 

FreeBSD (current) good for Laptops?

Post by Thomas Eva » Fri, 15 Nov 1996 04:00:00


Some laptops (IBM thinkpads in particular) don't work with the default
keyboard driver in freebsd, Linux runs great. Heard problem in freebsd
will be fixed next release...
--
Tom Evans

Disclaimer: My views are my own, your mileage might vary, taxes are extra, etc

 
 
 

FreeBSD (current) good for Laptops?

Post by michael butl » Mon, 18 Nov 1996 04:00:00


: Some laptops (IBM thinkpads in particular) don't work with the default
: keyboard driver in freebsd, Linux runs great. Heard problem in freebsd
: will be fixed next release...

Interesting .. I've been running FreeBSD on my 560 since June without any
"adjustments" of this nature,

        michael

 
 
 

FreeBSD (current) good for Laptops?

Post by Nate Willia » Tue, 19 Nov 1996 04:00:00





>: Some laptops (IBM thinkpads in particular) don't work with the default
>: keyboard driver in freebsd, Linux runs great. Heard problem in freebsd
>: will be fixed next release...

>Interesting .. I've been running FreeBSD on my 560 since June without any
>"adjustments" of this nature,

Newer ThinkPad's are 'more' standard, and don't require the hacks.  I'm
not sure why Linux's console driver doesn't require the hack, but there
bootblocks require a hack to work on older ThinkPad's that FreeBSD
doesn't need.

In any case, as soon as UserConfig gets working again it'll no longer be
a problem with FreeBSD.  It should work out of the box with all
ThinkPad's with a simple change in UserConfig to let the console driver
know that the machine is a ThinkPad.

Nate

--


work #: (406) 449-7662 | Montana (all the crazies are now in jail 'cept us
home #: (406) 443-7063 | natives). - Fly fishing fanatic!

 
 
 

FreeBSD (current) good for Laptops?

Post by AJ Musgrov » Thu, 21 Nov 1996 04:00:00


: Hello,

: I just bought a Laptop and want to put Unix on it.

: I heard some people say that Linux has better support for Laptop
: specific things (what support exactly is needed? PCMCIA? Power saving
: mode?)

: Is this really true? I would really prefer FreeBSD but wonder what
: problems/deficiencies I might encounter.

Let me add in my $0.02 here because I'm wonderin the same thing.

I have a IBM ThinkPad 486/DX 50mhz, 8M RAM, 170M hard disk, and an Active
Matrix monitor. Yes, I realize the HD is small, but I was thinking of a
minimum installation.

Does this sound possible? Also, it would be nice to have the base
development tools and the X package, but I really think i might be pushing
the limits there. Any thoughts?

--
AJ Musgrove

----------------------------------------------------------------
My opinions do not necessarily reflect those of my employer, or
anyone else for that matter. O-
----------------------------------------------------------------

 
 
 

FreeBSD (current) good for Laptops?

Post by Thomas Eva » Fri, 22 Nov 1996 04:00:00



> I have a IBM ThinkPad 486/DX 50mhz, 8M RAM, 170M hard disk, and an Active
> Matrix monitor. Yes, I realize the HD is small, but I was thinking of a
> minimum installation.

> Does this sound possible? Also, it would be nice to have the base
> development tools and the X package, but I really think i might be pushing
> the limits there. Any thoughts?

A quick check of my system shows me using 125M with base, X, and the
kernel source tree. If you plan on running X, you'll do some swapping
with only 8M. I only added emacs and a few other small apps...
however it quickly grows...
Regards,
--
Tom Evans

Disclaimer: My views are my own, your mileage might vary, taxes are extra, etc
 
 
 

FreeBSD (current) good for Laptops?

Post by Thomas Eva » Fri, 22 Nov 1996 04:00:00


Quote:> > Does this sound possible? Also, it would be nice to have the base
> > development tools and the X package, but I really think i might be pushing
> > the limits there. Any thoughts?

> A quick check of my system shows me using 125M with base, X, and the
> kernel source tree. If you plan on running X, you'll do some swapping
> with only 8M. I only added emacs and a few other small apps...
> however it quickly grows...

BTW, my linux system (on same thinkpad) which is somewhat older, i.e more
junk consumes 195K, of course I've installed Java JDK, Ghostscript, and
other disk hogs, in either case you'll have to be very selective.
Interesting is the network performance of Linux is 3X FreeBSD, I plan
on running other UNIX benchmarks for fun!
Regards,
--
Tom Evans

Disclaimer: My views are my own, your mileage might vary, taxes are extra, etc
 
 
 

FreeBSD (current) good for Laptops?

Post by Brian Some » Sat, 23 Nov 1996 04:00:00




: I have a IBM ThinkPad 486/DX 50mhz, 8M RAM, 170M hard disk, and an Active
: Matrix monitor. Yes, I realize the HD is small, but I was thinking of a
: minimum installation.
:
: Does this sound possible? Also, it would be nice to have the base
: development tools and the X package, but I really think i might be pushing
: the limits there. Any thoughts?

It should be fairly easy to put the base system (includes compiler), X and
the X libs/includes in 170Mb.  I really would recommend at least 16Mb of
memory when running X.  It ran for me on my laptop, but doing memory
intensive things killed the machine.

If you are stuck with 8Mb, I wouldn't bother loading the likes of emacs
and xv.  You may also be better off running rxvt instead of xterm.

--

      <http://www.awfulhak.demon.co.uk/>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour....
.

 
 
 

FreeBSD (current) good for Laptops?

Post by Jordan K. Hubbar » Mon, 25 Nov 1996 04:00:00



> Interesting is the network performance of Linux is 3X FreeBSD, I plan
> on running other UNIX benchmarks for fun!

More than interesting, this is almost unbelievable.  I'd be interested
in knowing exactly what versions of everything you used and the
benchmarks in question.  In particular, if you used the loopback device
then you haven't actually tested network performance at all.
--
- Jordan Hubbard
  President, FreeBSD Project
 
 
 

FreeBSD (current) good for Laptops?

Post by Thomas Eva » Wed, 27 Nov 1996 04:00:00



> > Interesting is the network performance of Linux is 3X FreeBSD, I plan
> > on running other UNIX benchmarks for fun!

> More than interesting, this is almost unbelievable.  I'd be interested
> in knowing exactly what versions of everything you used and the
> benchmarks in question.  In particular, if you used the loopback device
> then you haven't actually tested network performance at all.
> --
> - Jordan Hubbard
>   President, FreeBSD Project

After a private discussion, Jordan confirm my beliefs that the IBM CC
Enet driver (if_ze) needs some work and hasn't been optimized. I've never
had a problem on other hardware.
--
Tom Evans

Disclaimer: My views are my own, your mileage might vary, taxes are extra, etc
 
 
 

FreeBSD (current) good for Laptops?

Post by Nick Say » Tue, 03 Dec 1996 04:00:00



>After a private discussion, Jordan confirm my beliefs that the IBM CC
>Enet driver (if_ze) needs some work and hasn't been optimized. I've never
>had a problem on other hardware.

You really only ought to use if_ze for installation. Go get the PAO
package and let the card manager assign the ordinary ed driver to your
card. Works excellently for me. I haven't benchmarked it, but I would
venture to guess that it doesn't do any worse than the SMC Elite Ultra
I have in another machine here (to be fair, I actually have the National
Semi NE4100, but it's the same thing as the IBM card).

--


+1 408 249 9630, log in as 'guest' |
URL: http://www.kfu.com/~nsayer/   |

 
 
 

FreeBSD (current) good for Laptops?

Post by HOSOKAWA Tatsu » Wed, 04 Dec 1996 04:00:00




>> You really only ought to use if_ze for installation. Go get the PAO
>> package and let the card manager assign the ordinary ed driver to your
>> card. Works excellently for me. I haven't benchmarked it, but I would
>> venture to guess that it doesn't do any worse than the SMC Elite Ultra
>> I have in another machine here (to be fair, I actually have the National
>> Semi NE4100, but it's the same thing as the IBM card).

New version (961202) of PAO is released yesterday.  Please download it
from PAO web page (http://www.mt.cs.keio.ac.jp/person/hosokawa/PAO) or
anonymous ftp server
(ftp://ryukyu.mt.cs.keio.ac.jp/pub/FreeBSD/PAO/PAO-961202.tar.gz)

BTW, I changed development enviroment machine for PAO from Digital
Hinote Ultra 2 to Toshiba Libretto 30.  This new machine is very cute
(please see the picture on PAO web page).  Sorry, this model is not
sold in Japan only, but the size of keyboard doesn't match to the size
of hands of most American :-).  The size of body is 210 x 115 x 34 mm
(8.2 x 4.5 x 1.3 in) and the weight is only 840 g (1.85 lb).  It has
Am5x86 100MHz CPU, 6.1 inch TFT LCD, 20MB RAM and 500MB HDD (1/3 inch
height).

FreeBSD 2.2-ALPHA with PAO-961202 runs very fine on this machine. I'm
posting this article from this machine.  XFree86 3.2 also runs fine on
it.  My first "Palmtop FreeBSD machine".

--
HOSOKAWA, Tatsumi


 
 
 

FreeBSD (current) good for Laptops?

Post by HOSOKAWA Tatsu » Wed, 04 Dec 1996 04:00:00


Oops!


>> BTW, I changed development enviroment machine for PAO from Digital
>> Hinote Ultra 2 to Toshiba Libretto 30.  This new machine is very cute
>> (please see the picture on PAO web page).  Sorry, this model is not

                                                     typo ^^;   ~~~~~~is

Quote:>> sold in Japan only, but the size of keyboard doesn't match to the size
>> of hands of most American :-).  The size of body is 210 x 115 x 34 mm
>> (8.2 x 4.5 x 1.3 in) and the weight is only 840 g (1.85 lb).  It has
>> Am5x86 100MHz CPU, 6.1 inch TFT LCD, 20MB RAM and 500MB HDD (1/3 inch
>> height).

P.S.: I remember that sombody in FreeBSD project was interested in IBM
PT110 (this is also a Japanese domestic model, and is still the
smallest 486 machine in the world) when it was released, but Libretto
is easier for installing FreeBSD and is a very powerful machine with
larger storage.

--
HOSOKAWA, Tatsumi


 
 
 

FreeBSD (current) good for Laptops?

Post by Thomas Eva » Fri, 06 Dec 1996 04:00:00


Quote:> New version (961202) of PAO is released yesterday.  Please download it
> from PAO web page (http://www.mt.cs.keio.ac.jp/person/hosokawa/PAO) or
> anonymous ftp server
> (ftp://ryukyu.mt.cs.keio.ac.jp/pub/FreeBSD/PAO/PAO-961202.tar.gz)

I tried this on my 755C/with IBM E-net adapter, I was having all sorts
of problems when I had my modem card also inserted, I remove the modem
card and finally got the ethernet card to work, sort of, I can ping but
any large packets seem to get lost...its back to the if_ze driver
--
Tom Evans

Disclaimer: My views are my own, your mileage might vary, taxes are extra, etc
 
 
 

FreeBSD (current) good for Laptops?

Post by HOSOKAWA Tatsu » Sun, 08 Dec 1996 04:00:00




>> I tried this on my 755C/with IBM E-net adapter, I was having all sorts
>> of problems when I had my modem card also inserted, I remove the modem
>> card and finally got the ethernet card to work, sort of, I can ping but
>> any large packets seem to get lost...its back to the if_ze driver

Hmm..  If you have old kernel, pleas try to add 0x10 at the end of
config line of your Ethernet card's entry of /etc/pccard.conf.

For example,

        card "IBM Corp\." "Ethernet"
                config  default "ed0" any
                ether   0xff0 08:00:5a 00:04:ac

to,

        card "IBM Corp\." "Ethernet"
                config  default "ed0" any 0x10
                ether   0xff0 08:00:5a 00:04:ac

--
HOSOKAWA, Tatsumi


 
 
 

1. What Good Laptop Will Work With FreeBSD ?

Hi,
In my new job, I've been given carte blanche to buy myself a laptop, and I
intend to install FreeBSD onto it.

Could someone tell me what makes are known to work?  It's going to be in
the region of a high-end Pentium, with about 128 MB RAM, and a DD of at
least six or seven Gig.

Thanks.

--
Desmond Coughlan                    |System Administrator

http://212.198.64.228/

2. Want to set up a SLIP/PPP Server, Need HELP!

3. Toshiba Tecra Laptop Sound Problem 5.0 - Current

4. Linux and Power PC

5. CURRENT cardbus on laptop HP OBook 4100

6. Finding out what maintanace Level your at

7. Keyboard unuseable on laptop with current 2.5-BK linux

8. Does SuSE(5.1)-X have threads built in?

9. FreeBSD-current on Vaio-Z505LS

10. FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT

11. using ports from current onto freebsd 3.3

12. FreeBSD Current