Very Computer

by **Dave Ro** » Wed, 12 Jan 1994 09:41:14

Hello, I am having a problem mailing...everytime I mail someone it
sends me back an error report saying the following:

Date: Mon, 10 Jan 94 18:36 GMT

Subject: mail failed, returning to sender

|------------------------- Message log follows: -------------------------|
no valid recipients were found for this message
|------------------------- Message text follows: ------------------------|
Received: by draco.bison.mb.ca (Smail3.1.28.1 #3)
id m0pJRTv-0006FQC; Mon, 10 Jan 94 18:36 GMT

Date: Mon, 10 Jan 94 18:36 GMT
From: drose (Dave Rose)

And the /usr/spool/smail/logfile says the following:

I am noticing the bsmtp as the protocol being used...this used to
work before, I must have changed something, but I don't know what.
Can anyone help me out?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Box 48063 | VE4 LNX
Winnipeg, Manitoba|"My Suspicion is that the universe is not only
R2J 4A3 | *er than we suppose, but *er than we CAN
(204) 256-6975 | suppose.
| -- J.B.S. Haldane
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

by **Dave Ro** » Wed, 12 Jan 1994 09:43:48

Hello, I am having a problem mailing...everytime I mail someone it
sends me back an error report saying the following:

Date: Mon, 10 Jan 94 18:36 GMT

Subject: mail failed, returning to sender

|------------------------- Message log follows: -------------------------|
no valid recipients were found for this message
|------------------------- Message text follows: ------------------------|
Received: by draco.bison.mb.ca (Smail3.1.28.1 #3)
id m0pJRTv-0006FQC; Mon, 10 Jan 94 18:36 GMT

Date: Mon, 10 Jan 94 18:36 GMT
From: drose (Dave Rose)

And the /usr/spool/smail/logfile says the following:

I am noticing the bsmtp as the protocol being used...
This process used to work before, I must have changed something,
but I don't know what.
Can anyone help me out?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Box 48063 | VE4 LNX
Winnipeg, Manitoba|"My Suspicion is that the universe is not only
R2J 4A3 | *er than we suppose, but *er than we CAN
(204) 256-6975 | suppose.
| -- J.B.S. Haldane
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

by **Ralph E. Bu** » Fri, 14 Jan 1994 06:43:17

>Hello, I am having a problem mailing...everytime I mail someone it
>sends me back an error report saying the following:
>Date: Mon, 10 Jan 94 18:36 GMT

>Subject: mail failed, returning to sender
>|------------------------- Message log follows: -------------------------|
> no valid recipients were found for this message
>|------------------------- Message text follows: ------------------------|
>Received: by draco.bison.mb.ca (Smail3.1.28.1 #3)
> id m0pJRTv-0006FQC; Mon, 10 Jan 94 18:36 GMT

>Date: Mon, 10 Jan 94 18:36 GMT
>From: drose (Dave Rose)

>And the /usr/spool/smail/logfile says the following:
[stuff deleted]
>I am noticing the bsmtp as the protocol being used...

Well I can point out one thing... There's no To: line that's why there
isn't any valid recipients... Check the mailer that your using to send
it... Try just keeping it local (ie try not to use the smtp protocals)
and seeing if it includes the To: line then if so then check to see if
it sends it to the smtp port when it connects... etc...

hope this helps...
--
+--------------------------------------------------+------------------------+

|word and a gun than you can with just a kind word.|Embry-Riddle Aero. Univ.|
+--------------------------------------------------+------------------------+

by **Gary Anders** » Sat, 15 Jan 1994 03:13:23

I had a similar problem when, in using Pine 3.85, I upgraded my shell to
BASH-1.13. There was a small bug in Pine. I don't have the fix or diffs
here in the office, but if it's still giving you problems, e-mail me, and
I'll send them off to you. There's a new version of Pine out (3.89, I
think) in which this bug should be corrected. I understand Elm also had
this same problem that was evidenced when people changed to BASH 1.13.
That has also since been fixed.

Gary

by **Dave Ro** » Sat, 15 Jan 1994 17:50:43

>I had a similar problem when, in using Pine 3.85, I upgraded my shell to
>BASH-1.13. There was a small bug in Pine. I don't have the fix or diffs
>here in the office, but if it's still giving you problems, e-mail me, and
>I'll send them off to you. There's a new version of Pine out (3.89, I
>think) in which this bug should be corrected. I understand Elm also had
>this same problem that was evidenced when people changed to BASH 1.13.
>That has also since been fixed.
>Gary

Ok, great, I'll upgrade my pine and elm then, and I'll move back up
to bash 1.13...were there any other programs that need fixing that you
are aware of? I'd really like to make sure before I destroy things
again. :)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Box 48063 | VE4 LNX
Winnipeg, Manitoba|"My Suspicion is that the universe is not only
R2J 4A3 | *er than we suppose, but *er than we CAN
(204) 256-6975 | suppose.
| -- J.B.S. Haldane
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

by **Gary Anders** » Mon, 17 Jan 1994 13:53:00

: >I had a similar problem when, in using Pine 3.85, I upgraded my shell to
: >BASH-1.13. There was a small bug in Pine. I don't have the fix or diffs
: >here in the office, but if it's still giving you problems, e-mail me, and
: >I'll send them off to you. There's a new version of Pine out (3.89, I
: >think) in which this bug should be corrected. I understand Elm also had
: >this same problem that was evidenced when people changed to BASH 1.13.
: >That has also since been fixed.

: >Gary

: Ok, great, I'll upgrade my pine and elm then, and I'll move back up
: to bash 1.13...were there any other programs that need fixing that you
: are aware of? I'd really like to make sure before I destroy things
: again. :)

: --------------------------------------------------------------------------

: Box 48063 | VE4 LNX
: Winnipeg, Manitoba|"My Suspicion is that the universe is not only
: R2J 4A3 | *er than we suppose, but *er than we CAN
: (204) 256-6975 | suppose.
: | -- J.B.S. Haldane
: --------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dave,
None that I'm aware of, and I've been running BASH 1.13 for a couple of months now.

Gary

Very Computer

SMAIL AND MAILING PROBLEM!

SMAIL AND MAILING PROBLEM!

SMAIL AND MAILING PROBLEM!

SMAIL AND MAILING PROBLEM!

SMAIL AND MAILING PROBLEM!

SMAIL AND MAILING PROBLEM!

SMAIL AND MAILING PROBLEM!