RAM use

RAM use

Post by P. Sylv?nn » Sun, 11 Aug 2002 14:56:39



Have installed RH7.2, Gnome and OpenOffice recently.
The problem is RAM utilisation. When Linux alone with Gnome is loaded, 60 MB
RAM is in use. A minimum of other programs are loaded at this time.
Now, when OO is started (no document open), over 200 MB RAM is required.
Loading takes almost 2 mins.

What is wrong? Can I adjust memory usage somewhere? This looks to me worse
than Win.
My computer is P150, 128 MB.

Regards

Olli

 
 
 

RAM use

Post by Peter J. Stewar » Sun, 11 Aug 2002 21:22:38



> Have installed RH7.2, Gnome and OpenOffice recently.
> The problem is RAM utilisation. When Linux alone with Gnome is loaded, 60 MB
> RAM is in use. A minimum of other programs are loaded at this time.
> Now, when OO is started (no document open), over 200 MB RAM is required.
> Loading takes almost 2 mins.

> What is wrong? Can I adjust memory usage somewhere? This looks to me worse
> than Win.
> My computer is P150, 128 MB.

> Regards

> Olli

When OO is starting up, do you hear a lot of disk activity all the time?
If so, then your problem may indeed be memory and you might think about
increasing how much you have. As it is, the program may be thrashing by
having to constantly access swap space. I'm able to run StarOffice
(which is similar to OO) in 256MB with no problem.

However, if you don't hear a lot of disk activity all the time while OO
is starting, it may be just your CPU speed. 150Mhz is a considered a bit
slow these days.

Pete

 
 
 

RAM use

Post by Jc » Mon, 12 Aug 2002 16:25:22


Could it be a bug? Sounds like a memory leak. Try a updated or stable verson
of OO.

Jc.

Quote:> Have installed RH7.2, Gnome and OpenOffice recently.
> The problem is RAM utilisation. When Linux alone with Gnome is loaded, 60
MB
> RAM is in use. A minimum of other programs are loaded at this time.
> Now, when OO is started (no document open), over 200 MB RAM is required.
> Loading takes almost 2 mins.

> What is wrong? Can I adjust memory usage somewhere? This looks to me worse
> than Win.
> My computer is P150, 128 MB.

> Regards

> Olli

-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----==  Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
 
 
 

1. 2.0.34 _only_ 64MByte of 128MByte RAM used!

Hello everybody!

I just upgraded from 2.0.33 to 2.0.34 and 64 MBytes are lost the way.
I could imagine three problems:

a) there is a hard-coded limit to 64 MByte
b) timing problems, but the RAMs pass the complete BIOS test without
problems and are used properly with 2.0.33
c) BIOS-setting of using 512KByte Cache is confused

System: HX-Board with 512 KByte Cache and proper TAG-Ram
(Chaintech 5IFM1-M202), Intel P5-166MMX,
4x32MByte 60ns-EDO-RAM. More info needed?

Any ideas?

regards
        Matthias Eckermann

--
Matthias Eckermann, Munich/Germany

(WWW)          http://www.lrz-muenchen.de/~eckerman/   |  humanum
(Webmaster/2)  http://www.kaththeol.uni-muenchen.de/   |  est

2. creating device for serial port

3. 486 install on 240mb drive w/ 8mb RAM using FreeBSD 2.2.5

4. ssh install problem

5. A lot of ram used for Buffers. Swap is growing.

6. port listings

7. Using full 4G of RAM for a single process

8. Using select() to monitor file growth/changes

9. Settings to use RAM before using SWAP space?

10. 512KB cache size and using 256MB RAM

11. Not using all available RAM

12. boot/root disks using ram disk

13. All physical RAM not used by linux 2.4.21 Mandrake 9.1