AcceleratedX vs. Metro-X?

AcceleratedX vs. Metro-X?

Post by Travis Sear » Sun, 14 May 1995 04:00:00



I have a Matrox 2MB video card and am looking to run
X in something other than 640x480/16 color.

Is anyone using AcceleratedX or Metro-X?  Which is the
best?  Are there any others that support Matrox?

Thanks for the info!
---
Travis Searls

 
 
 

AcceleratedX vs. Metro-X?

Post by M.B » Sun, 14 May 1995 04:00:00



>I have a Matrox 2MB video card and am looking to run
>X in something other than 640x480/16 color.

>Is anyone using AcceleratedX or Metro-X?  Which is the
>best?  Are there any others that support Matrox?

>Thanks for the info!
>---
>Travis Searls


I don't know you whether you will get more than 640x480/16 colors with
any of these, I can give some comparisons if you give futher details
about your "best". Best in terms of what? Speed? ettc. ....

 
 
 

AcceleratedX vs. Metro-X?

Post by Linas Petr » Fri, 19 May 1995 04:00:00



: >I have a Matrox 2MB video card and am looking to run
: >X in something other than 640x480/16 color.
: >
: >Is anyone using AcceleratedX or Metro-X?  Which is the
: >best?  Are there any others that support Matrox?

        I use the MetroLink Xserver with and MGA-II+ at upto 1280x1024x256
        colours. Works pretty good. I haven't tried the AcceleratedX one
        though.