Accelerated X and memory problem?

Accelerated X and memory problem?

Post by Randy Lee Carpent » Wed, 24 Jul 1996 04:00:00



Things that are written poorly (such as netscape) dont use memory use
memory very well.... And it seems that in Accel X, it uses a feature known
as 'backing store' which caches things in memory. And since Netscape is
such a big piece of crap, it doesnt clean up after itself when you exit.
I suggest using the -bs option to the X server, this will disable the
backing store, and Xaccel shouldnt eat more than 5 or 6 megs of memory.

: Linuxers,

: I have heard of memory problems and Xfree86. Does this problem
: exist with Accelerated X?

: I have Accelerated X and fvwm95 on Redhat 3.0.3 with 16 MB ram
: and 16 MB swap space
: It seems that whenever I run Netscape, I am not able to open more
: than two apps at a time. Any app I open just quits. Is this a memory
: free problem? I am wondering if adding more memory is necessarily
: going to solve the problem or not?

: Any info is appreciated

: later,
: abid

: PS By the way what is ECC momry I keep hearing about? I have heard of
: parity. Is it the same?

:  _______________________________________________________________
: |                          ...::xx !!"   Abid M. Jindani |
: |                    -::!!!~  -!  X?Xx   aka DarkJedi         |
: |          <:::'<!~   !! <?   !!   !?.   Electrical Engineering      |
: |`*X!!~     ">  -X+!  <! ?!   ?*  ~!?T   Texas Tech University     |

: |  +!:      ?<- `!   ~X! `#XXX~                                    |
: |  ^%!    . <(. :?    ^"                   "On a clear disk you  |
: |  +?!   :(<!!~-"`       The choice of a     can seek forever." |
: | .!%!>~~`               GNU generation.                           |
: |_______________________________________________________________|
: http://pegasus.acs.ttu.edu/~z3abd

--
____________________________________________________________________________
Randy Carpenter - Computer Science Major, Recording Technology Minor
Bowling Green State University
Computer Consultant - University Computer Services

WWW: http://www.bgsu.edu/~rcarpen/
____________________________________________________________________________

 
 
 

Accelerated X and memory problem?

Post by DarkJe » Wed, 24 Jul 1996 04:00:00


Linuxers,

I have heard of memory problems and Xfree86. Does this problem
exist with Accelerated X?

I have Accelerated X and fvwm95 on Redhat 3.0.3 with 16 MB ram
and 16 MB swap space
It seems that whenever I run Netscape, I am not able to open more
than two apps at a time. Any app I open just quits. Is this a memory
free problem? I am wondering if adding more memory is necessarily
going to solve the problem or not?

Any info is appreciated

later,
abid

PS By the way what is ECC momry I keep hearing about? I have heard of
parity. Is it the same?

 _______________________________________________________________
|                          ...::xx !!"   Abid M. Jindani   |
|                    -::!!!~  -!  X?Xx   aka DarkJedi           |
|          <:::'<!~   !! <?   !!   !?.   Electrical Engineering        |
|`*X!!~     ">  -X+!  <! ?!   ?*  ~!?T   Texas Tech University       |

|  +!:      ?<- `!   ~X! `#XXX~                                      |
|  ^%!    . <(. :?    ^"                   "On a clear disk you    |
|  +?!   :(<!!~-"`       The choice of a     can seek forever." |
| .!%!>~~`               GNU generation.                             |
|_______________________________________________________________|
http://pegasus.acs.ttu.edu/~z3abd

 
 
 

Accelerated X and memory problem?

Post by The GasM » Wed, 31 Jul 1996 04:00:00



says...

Quote:

> Things that are written poorly (such as netscape) dont use memory use
> memory very well.... And it seems that in Accel X, it uses a feature
known
> as 'backing store' which caches things in memory. And since Netscape is
> such a big piece of crap, it doesnt clean up after itself when you
exit.
> I suggest using the -bs option to the X server, this will disable the
> backing store, and Xaccel shouldnt eat more than 5 or 6 megs of memory.

Could you tell me how to implement this in the X server? I never had this
problem cause I hadn't upped Netscape yet...
 
 
 

1. Accelerated X problems from an Accelerated X newbie

Hi folks,

I am very much the newbie at Accelerated X (I have used MetroX for
most of my X needs)

In any case, here is my problem:

Just reinstalled my system:  RedHat 5.1

installed Accelerated X 4.1

getting the following errors

Example:

wmaker:  error in loading shared libraries
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6: undefined symbol: _Xglobal_lock

wmaker never actually starts, just dumps.  I relinked libXext.so.6 to
libXext.so.6.1 (it was linked to libXext.so.6.2).  I was hoping this
would at least allow me to start window maker, which it did.  The
problem though, was that no applications would work.  Each would give
me some other library error (and attempting to relink them did no
help).

kernel 2.0.35

This occurs with:
fvwm
enlightenment
window maker (hey i even remembered the space)

can someone please give me some hint as to what may be the issue?
This has been ongoing for most of the weekend.

thanks a ton

[Sn]

2. Installing man pages to disk

3. Matrox Mystique ands X.

4. UUCP - Email Addressing Questions

5. Accelerated X 2.1 memory usage

6. NIS+: Stupid Question of the Day!

7. accelerated X gfx problems

8. Installation of EtherExpress PRO/10 not working

9. Accelerated-X problems?

10. Memory problem. No linear memory?!?!?

11. Problems w/ Accelerated-X 1.3 & Imagine 128 (2Megs)

12. accelerated video problem

13. Linux Memory Limitations (was Re: Memory problem)