by Patrick Wra » Sat, 18 Apr 1998 04:00:00
Has anybody succeeded in compiling any qt applications with the above?
I downloaded the source rpm for RedHat 5. Compiled qt, and samples with gcc
2.7.something. But, when I upgraded to gcc-2.8.1 (which I really want to
keep because of its support for the standard c++ library), I found I
couldn't compile any qt samples. Has anybody else had this problem, or
better still, does anyone know how to fix it?
by E. Kevin Hal » Tue, 21 Apr 1998 04:00:00
> Has anybody succeeded in compiling any qt applications with the above?
> I downloaded the source rpm for RedHat 5. Compiled qt, and samples with gcc
> 2.7.something. But, when I upgraded to gcc-2.8.1 (which I really want to
> keep because of its support for the standard c++ library), I found I
> couldn't compile any qt samples. Has anybody else had this problem, or
> better still, does anyone know how to fix it?
by Christopher Seawo » Thu, 23 Apr 1998 04:00:00
: >
: > Has anybody succeeded in compiling any qt applications with the above?
: >
: > I downloaded the source rpm for RedHat 5. Compiled qt, and samples with gcc
: > 2.7.something. But, when I upgraded to gcc-2.8.1 (which I really want to
: > keep because of its support for the standard c++ library), I found I
: > couldn't compile any qt samples. Has anybody else had this problem, or
: > better still, does anyone know how to fix it?
:
: Welcome to the world of the 2.8.x compilers. Same thing happens
: with egcs and pgcc
: (on which they are based). I just keep both versions around and
: rpm them in and out as needed.
See http://www.seawood.org/linux/patches/qt-1.31-gcc.patch. I made
this patch to clean up some compiler warnings and I had no problem
compiling the qt examples.
--
Regards,
Christopher
-----
Software Engineer / Unix Sysadmin / Linux Advocate / Prince Fanatic
http://people.qualcomm.com/cseawood/
My opinions are my own and not those of my employer.
1. gcc-2.8.1 and libc.so.5 on redhat 5.0
Hi,
I need to compile a shared library (plugin for Netscape) on
RedHat 5.0 using gcc-2.8.1 (2.8.1 because I want to use exceptions).
Unfortunately exceptions imply usage of libstdc++, which in turn
seems to need libc.so.6 because it lacks such functions as _IO_putc
or _IO_peekc_locked, that can't be found in libc.so.5. There is also
a problem with "bad reloc type".
But netscape doesn't like libc.so.6. It crashes in rindex() when
attempting to load some shared libraries.
So, the question is: Can I use gcc-2.8.1 and still work with
libc.so.5, which netscape forces me to use?
MANY thanks in advance,
Andrew.
3. GCC-2.8.0 or GCC-2.8.1(alpha?)
5. GCC-2.7.2 OR GCC-2.8.1 FOR AIX
6. Solaris 9 Data Encryption Supplement now available (finally... ;)
7. 2.2.18+ adaptec 29160 (scsi0:-1:-1:-1) Referenced SCB 0 not valid
8. solaris like a PDC windows nt server?
10. Using gcc and libc instead of glibc on Redhat 5.0
12. XF86_SVGA doesn't start when kernel 2.0.35 is compiled with gcc-2.8.1
13. X & gcc-2.8.1