Very Computer

1. Gnome needs E, E don't need Gnome

When I started using Linux I cut my teeth on KDE, it helped me get up to
speed quickly, very Windows like.

When I installed RedHat 6.1, I gave Gnome, running on top of E, a try
for a long while.

Since then I have tried Blackbox, Sawmill and now I just run plain E
with the blueheart theme.

My question is what if any advantages are there to running Gnome on top
of E. E seems to run all Gnome and KDE apps just fine, the memory
footprint is small and Netscape seems to be more stable. E has a pager,
iconbox and a menu system a mouse click away.

My system is running just fine but I feel like I am getting away with
something and I don't know what it is.

My system:
Pentium 200mhz, 128mb ram, Matrox Millennium II 4mb

--
hcg

2. obscure read-only file system remount bug with 2.4 kernel

3. Problem with Gnome RPM - Failed to open /var/lib/rpm/packages.rpm

4. Arp program not working in slackware?

5. Installing RPMS on RH 6.0 (Gnome RPM inadequate)

6. SCO Openserver 5.0

7. Palm data to gnome-cal, gnome-card?

8. Miscellaneous questions - RS6000

9. Blastwave Gnome vs. Sun's Gnome

10. Gnome Configuration files -Gnome 2

11. GNOME set up... having a hiccup during GNOME start up.

12. Gnome 2.0, Gnome 1.x compatibility?

13. GNOME settings daemon failing - GNOME 2.0 + Solaris 9