by Steve Snyde » Wed, 16 Feb 2000 04:00:00
Is this true? Is there greater benefit in SMP to a larger L2 cache,
even if it is half as fast?
Thank you.
***** Steve Snyder *****
1. Q: Shared L2 cache on SMP system
I've purchased recently this specific motherboard (Tomcat IV Dual) with
2 P200/MMX, they're worth 398 BogoMips each (that's 796 BogoMips all
together !). But I don't know if this figure means anything at all.
Otherwise, the performance is not too bad at all.. :) Be a little more
specific about what you'd like to know about it.
--
Software Engineer Brokat Systeme hotline +49 1805 217171
odi profanum vulgus et arceo
PGP key ID 2B37D181 available on key servers
2. ppp woes.
3. Raise MAX_MP_BUSSES to 256 on SMP boxes
4. SCSI CD-RW: yamaha 4416s: HowTo REWrite CD-RW's?
6. Changing shells on Solaris 2.5 for non-root accounts
7. GUS + BusLogic BT-445S + STB Pegasus + DX2/66 + 256 kB cache = trouble
8. fork, pthread_create and the FP stack
10. Q: System w/ limited 256 kB cache, 16MB->32MB = slower linux.
11. Apache Proxy -- cache statistics (%full, cache-hit-rate)?
12. Linux 2.0.30, SMP, Efficiency, and Distributed Net/RC5
13. L2 Cache