Matrox g450 + tuxracer = slow slow slow!!! [???]

Matrox g450 + tuxracer = slow slow slow!!! [???]

Post by u228386d.. » Wed, 01 Aug 2001 09:26:16



I have a Matrox 16MB g450 DH on my dual 450MHz celeron linux box
(kernel 2.4.2-2smp).  It runs nicely for most stuff.  When i run
tuxracer (0.61) and other random nice looking games, it is so
unbelievably slow, i think my frame rate is about 1/10 frame/second.
(yes, one frame every 10 seconds).  I have tried it with both the
default XFree mga drivers (XFree86 4003) and with the beta drivers
from matrox (including mga_hal).  I have toyed with settings as per
many discussions i read on groups.google.com, and it has made very
little difference.

I thought "hmmm...maybe it's my machine", so I tried running tuxracer
on my linux box at work (Matrox 16MB g450 DH, 1.2GHz Athlon, kernel
2.4.something, tried both default and matrox beta drivers), and it is
equally as slow.

However, when running it on windows 98, ATI All-In-Wonder 128 (16MB,
Rage128 acceleration, bought in 1998!) with a single 450MHz celeron,
it is just *screaming* fast.  (Granted, it is also an OS port of the
game)

The question:
Are Matrox cards just this slow for OpenGL?  Are they this slow for 3D
software in general?  Is there anything i can do to get fast 3D
graphics out of this card short of buying another card?

thanks,
cam

ps.  the email address under which i have posted *is* real (until i
recycle it).  Feel free to email responses.  If you're tired of spam,
check out www.sneakemail.com.

ObDisclaimer: I have reviewed the content of the two groups to which i
have posted this, and believe my post to be appropriate for them.
Please don't bite my head off if you disagree.

 
 
 

Matrox g450 + tuxracer = slow slow slow!!! [???]

Post by Aniarti » Wed, 01 Aug 2001 09:55:04



> The question:
> Are Matrox cards just this slow for OpenGL?  Are they this slow for 3D
> software in general?  Is there anything i can do to get fast 3D
> graphics out of this card short of buying another card?

I don't think soo.. I think that glx isn't setup properly on these
machines.. that's MHO.. I'm fairly sure I've seen 16fps from tux racer on a
~750Mhz Duron 650.

Ami

Quote:> ps.  the email address under which i have posted *is* real (until i
> recycle it).  Feel free to email responses.  If you're tired of spam,
> check out www.sneakemail.com.

check out my email address.. almost 0 spam since I've used it.. ;) nothing
like using thier own wepon agains them

--
Disclamer:
I reserve the right to be 100% wrong/have malformed &/or biased opinions,
feel free to politely correct me. If however you do not wish to be
courteous go {the remainder of this disclamer has been censored}!

 
 
 

Matrox g450 + tuxracer = slow slow slow!!! [???]

Post by Mik Miffli » Wed, 01 Aug 2001 12:39:11


I have a k6-2 500 running with a Matrox 32MB G450, and it runs great.  
After starting X, cat /var/log/XFree86.0.log | grep DRI, and that should,
among others, give you a DRI enabled line.  If that is not there, then the
MGA drivers are most likely not installed properly.

 - Mik Mifflin
dogansmoobs at ctel dot net


> I have a Matrox 16MB g450 DH on my dual 450MHz celeron linux box
> (kernel 2.4.2-2smp).  It runs nicely for most stuff.  When i run
> tuxracer (0.61) and other random nice looking games, it is so
> unbelievably slow, i think my frame rate is about 1/10 frame/second.
> (yes, one frame every 10 seconds).  I have tried it with both the
> default XFree mga drivers (XFree86 4003) and with the beta drivers
> from matrox (including mga_hal).  I have toyed with settings as per
> many discussions i read on groups.google.com, and it has made very
> little difference.

> I thought "hmmm...maybe it's my machine", so I tried running tuxracer
> on my linux box at work (Matrox 16MB g450 DH, 1.2GHz Athlon, kernel
> 2.4.something, tried both default and matrox beta drivers), and it is
> equally as slow.

> However, when running it on windows 98, ATI All-In-Wonder 128 (16MB,
> Rage128 acceleration, bought in 1998!) with a single 450MHz celeron,
> it is just *screaming* fast.  (Granted, it is also an OS port of the
> game)

> The question:
> Are Matrox cards just this slow for OpenGL?  Are they this slow for 3D
> software in general?  Is there anything i can do to get fast 3D
> graphics out of this card short of buying another card?

> thanks,
> cam

> ps.  the email address under which i have posted *is* real (until i
> recycle it).  Feel free to email responses.  If you're tired of spam,
> check out www.sneakemail.com.

> ObDisclaimer: I have reviewed the content of the two groups to which i
> have posted this, and believe my post to be appropriate for them.
> Please don't bite my head off if you disagree.

--
 - Mik Mifflin
dogansmoobs at ctel dot net
 
 
 

1. Tin newsreader, slow slow slow

err, this may, or may not be off topic.  i am using:

tin pre-1.4 release 19990927 ("Nine While Nine")
[UNIX] (c) Copyright 1991-99 Eain Lea.

usenet.xxx.edu InterNetNews NNRP server INN 1.7.2 08-Dec-1997
ready (posting ok).

and, yes, i do attend "xxx" univeristy. i never miss a class!

i'm just a lowly user :)  anyhow, when it reads a newsgroup, it has a
status type thing where it says 145674/4564324 like that.  it seems to
get a _huge_ portion right off the bat, then it slows to increments of
fifty.  i _could_ install tin on my linux laptop, but space is ver
limited.  and, what would be the point? i still need a connection to the
net. as a user, i use the version on my schools sun computers.  can
i get tin to work faster at bringing up a newsgroup?

otherwise, tin is neato :)


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/

2. Cable modem/Intel Etherexpress PRO/10 help

3. SMB slow, Samba slow, or something else slow?

4. S3 Virge and friends

5. Help - slow,slow, slip,slip, slow

6. Problems in accessing DLT in SAN-Environment

7. Newby (After 4.3.2 install, CDE LOGIN IS SLOW SLOW SLOW)

8. s390 (5/16): s390 network driver fixes.

9. rcmd fast, slow, slow, slow, fast, slow, slow. Again!!

10. Tuxracer slow?

11. slow, slow 7.3

12. Slow, slow telnet & FTP?

13. Slow/aborting TCP/IP over slow (e.g. 33K6) links with Solaris 2.6