Debian, Red Hat or Slackware?

Debian, Red Hat or Slackware?

Post by 'Stingray' S. Row » Fri, 06 Dec 1996 04:00:00



   I don't mean to start up a religious war, but I'm about to install
linux and I can't figure out which package to use.  I know it is largely a
matter of preference, but I'd appreciate it if people could illuminate the
pros and cons of each one.  I have the Linux Journal article on them, but
that is not really comparative.  Any help would be most appreciated.

/---------------------------+-------------------------------------------\
|  Steve Rowe      aka      |  There exists no dream worth chasing      |
| (         / |\/|          |     if it cannot satisfy                  |
| )tingray /  |  |addog     |  There exists no god worth serving        |
|                           |     if he cannot hear your cry            |
|                           |                                           |

\---------------------------+-------------------------------------------/
Home Page - http://www.whitman.edu/~rowesc

 
 
 

Debian, Red Hat or Slackware?

Post by Chris Fearnl » Fri, 06 Dec 1996 04:00:00


Debian - the best IMHO :)  It has excellent support on its mailing lists,
a public bug reporting system, and is the only distribution which can be
upgraded in place over the 'net.  Debian has nearly twice as many packages
as Red Hat.  It is probably the hardest to install of the three, but Linux
is so easy to install that this is not much of a factor.  Debian 1.2 is
in final preparation for a new release in the next few weeks.

Red Hat - Very Good.  Since Red Hat is commercial they sacrifice some
things (like convenience of upgrading (they require you to reboot onto
a bootdisk which is hard to do if you only have telnet access to a
machine)) but get to market with the spiffiest install around.

Slackware - Not very good anymore.  Once one of the best distributions,
Slackware has slacked off and this reviewer no longer recommends it.

--
Christopher J. Fearnley            |    Nothin But Net System Engineering

http://www.netaxs.com/~cjf         |    (Philadelphia Area Computer Society)
ftp://ftp.netaxs.com/people/cjf    |    Design Science Revolutionary
"Dare to be Naive" -- Bucky Fuller |    Explorer in Universe

 
 
 

Debian, Red Hat or Slackware?

Post by Erik Tro » Sun, 08 Dec 1996 04:00:00



Quote:>Red Hat - Very Good.  Since Red Hat is commercial they sacrifice some
>things (like convenience of upgrading (they require you to reboot onto
>a bootdisk which is hard to do if you only have telnet access to a
>machine)) but get to market with the spiffiest install around.

We now require a reboot for an install as it's the only way to ensure that
the new version of a kernel will work on your system. Installing a new
kernel with new modules without testing the kernel on the particular hardware
set which is being upgraded is dangerous.

Erik

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|       I told you I'm not very bright -- Sugar in "Some Like It Hot"         |
|      "RPM is the greatest thing since swap-space" - Bryan C. Andregg
|                                                                             |

 
 
 

Debian, Red Hat or Slackware?

Post by Chris Fearnl » Tue, 10 Dec 1996 04:00:00




>>Red Hat - Very Good.  Since Red Hat is commercial they sacrifice some
>>things (like convenience of upgrading (they require you to reboot onto
>>a bootdisk which is hard to do if you only have telnet access to a
>>machine)) but get to market with the spiffiest install around.

>We now require a reboot for an install as it's the only way to ensure that
>the new version of a kernel will work on your system. Installing a new
>kernel with new modules without testing the kernel on the particular hardware
>set which is being upgraded is dangerous.

Not as dangerous as having my client do the upgrade himself :)

Since I don't have physical access to the machine, I had to learn how
to do it the "unsupported" way.  Actually it wasn't much worse than
a Debian upgrade.  The main shortcoming was a feeling that I may have
omitted something.

--
Christopher J. Fearnley            |    Nothin But Net System Engineering

http://www.netaxs.com/~cjf         |    (Philadelphia Area Computer Society)
ftp://ftp.netaxs.com/people/cjf    |    Design Science Revolutionary
"Dare to be Naive" -- Bucky Fuller |    Explorer in Universe

 
 
 

1. Red Hat 7.1 - Installing Red Hat packages after Red Hat is already installed.

How can I install packages that I forgot to install with the Red Hat
7.1 installation?

Here's my problem:
Various pieces of Red Hat keep saying that I am missing a file and
that it needs to be installed with a certain package (namely most of
the Kontrol Panel).  But I have been unsuccessful at finding where
this is done.  I am still a newbie with Linux, but I would assume that
there should be an "Add/Remove Programs" equivalent with Linux.

Please help!

2. Server assigned DNS

3. red hat, debian, slackware reboot on install

4. 3Com 3cx99x Full Duplex ?

5. red hat, debian, slackware reboot during install

6. Mail Question

7. COMMERCIAL: New TRI-Linux CD: Red Hat 4.1, Slackware 3.1and Debian 1.2.5

8. WANTED: Tiara network card drivers

9. Linux Red Hat Debian Slackware, what's best?

10. Red Hat vs. Slackware vs. Debian

11. Slackware, Red Hat, Debian, S.u.S.E.: Any preferences?

12. Which Linux to download: Red Hat, Debian, or Slackware?

13. Slackware, Red Hat or Debian?