> : > >But it is a *very* old version, don't forget that.
> : >
> : > What version is it ?
> : Like the guy said above, version 2, as in version 2.0.
> Yes. What *were* PC World thinking of? I bought the magazine
> purely because it seemed like a good opportunity to upgrade
> a few things I'd been missing - new libraries etc.
> But the PC World CD had kernel 1.0.9 or something ancient like
> that. Shame.
I get the mag every month anyway so it's not such a big deal, however,
there were two things that pissed me off. One thing was they said that
Linux was "Shareware", a bit misleading at best if you ask me.
The other things was what they missed out. Like, I saw Linux was on the
CD I and thought "cool, I bet there is a big article on how to install
it and stuff like that, should get a few more people interested". Nope,
not a thing, not even a mention of it in the 32bit section of the mag
where they *do* talk about Linux from time to time. Talking about screwing
up!
I guess they just don't have a clue.
--
Dave Pearson | Let us not assasinate this lad further, Senator.
Bass Player for the | Have you no sense of decency, Sir?
Cheri-Woodpeckers | At long last, have you no sense of decency?