Hi,
Does anyone know where I can find more detail information on the /proc
filesystem?
Thanks.
Hoa.
Hi,
Does anyone know where I can find more detail information on the /proc
filesystem?
Thanks.
Hoa.
You do not say what information you have already so how can anyone
possibly know that the information they know about is more detailed?
There's some info in /usr/src/linux/Documentation.
There's some in the proc manpage.
There's a lot scattered in comments in the kernel sources.
--
. _\\__[oo from | Phones: +44 121 471 3789 (home)
. l___\\ /~~) /~~[ / [ | PGP-fp: D7 03 2A 4B D8 3A 05 37...
# ll l\\ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | http://wcl-l.bham.ac.uk/~bam/
> > Does anyone know where I can find more detail information on the /proc
> > filesystem?
> No. The answer to this question is necessarily "no". You could have
> worked this out before posting it.
> You do not say what information you have already so how can anyone
> possibly know that the information they know about is more detailed?
That is for what newsgroups are: discussions and asking questions. And I
just don't want them to become too hostile to someone asking an innocent
question as they seem to more and more often moving in that direction.
J. S. Jensen
> > > Does anyone know where I can find more detail information on the /proc
> > > filesystem?
> > No. The answer to this question is necessarily "no". You could have
> > worked this out before posting it.
> > You do not say what information you have already so how can anyone
> > possibly know that the information they know about is more detailed?
> Heaven forbid someone might just answer a question instead of...
So you think I should have just left it at that? I think that would
be unhelpful to say the least.
I then went on to explain why the answer was "no", how he could have
improved his chances of getting useful responses and finally gave him
my best guess at the answer to the question he really meant to ask.
If I feel insulted it is not at lack of knowledge it's at lack ofQuote:> ...feeling insulted by someone else's lack of knowledge and saying
> what is above.
To help him.Quote:> Why do you feel you must knock him?
Yes but they are not like small face-to-face meetings or IRC.Quote:> That is for what newsgroups are: discussions and asking questions.
Hostile, who's being hostile? I think it is *you* how need to lightenQuote:> And I just don't want them to become too hostile to someone...
I do not consider this question to be "innocent". He is guitly ofQuote:> ...asking an innocent question...
I don't think the atmostphere on Usenet is changing. "Ask a sillyQuote:> ...as they seem to more and more often moving in that direction.
--
. _\\__[oo from | Phones: +44 121 471 3789 (home)
. l___\\ /~~) /~~[ / [ | PGP-fp: D7 03 2A 4B D8 3A 05 37...
# ll l\\ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | http://www.veryComputer.com/~bam/
1. PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc
Just think about it for a minute.
There are three ways to address "/proc":
- 100% binary interface
* human interaction doesn't belong in the kernel - period.
- optimally formated text
* not designed for humans, but in human format ("text")
- human readable
* thus the entire OS is reduced to "cat" and "echo"
Providing more than one interface/format means code duplication. It doesn't
matter how much is actually compiled. Someone has to write it. Others have
to maintain it. Suddenly a change in one place becomes a change in dozens
of places.
Personally, I vote for a 100% binary interface. (no surprise there.) It
makes things in kernel land so much cleaner, faster, and smaller. Yes,
it increases the demands on userland to some degree. However, printf/scanf
is one hell of a lot more wasteful than a simple mov.
For my worst case scenerio, answer this:
How do you tell how many processors are in a Linux box?
The kernel already knows this, but it isn't exposed to userland. So, one
must resort to ass-backward, stupid shit like counting entries in
/proc/cpuinfo. And to make things even worse, the format is different for
every arch! (I've been bitching about this for four (4) years.)
And for those misguided people who think processing text is faster than
binary, you're idiots. The values start out as binary, get converted to
text, copied to the user, and then converted back to binary. How the hell
is that faster than copying the original binary value? (Answer: it isn't.)
And those who *will* complain that binary structures are hard to work with,
(you're idiots too :-)) a struct is far easier to deal with than text
processing, esp. for anyone who knows what they are doing. Yes, changes
to the struct do tend to break applications, but the same thing happens
to text based inputs as well. Perhaps some of you will remember the stink
that arose when the layout of /proc/meminfo changed (and broke, basically,
everything.)
--Ricky
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
2. New Configure script (and some console patches)
3. PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff])
4. Problems With Large Memory.
6. Linux Partition seen under win95
7. Getting interface IP addresses with proc filesystem
8. Signals
10. Mounting proc filesystem dup2: Bad file descriptor
11. proc filesystem
12. proc filesystem?
13. Why does 'tar -clf' archive /proc filesystem?