by L Ta » Sat, 03 Mar 2001 01:47:37
by Paul Kimo » Sat, 03 Mar 2001 02:38:26
: Files placed in the Linux Kernel Archives are automatically
: OpenPGP-signed by the archive. This signature can be used to prove that a
: file, which may have been obtained from a mirror site or other location,
: really originated at the Linux Kernel Archives.
--
Paul Kimoto
This message was originally posted on Usenet in plain text. Any images,
hyperlinks, or the like shown here have been added without my consent,
and may be a violation of international copyright law.
by Thomas Camero » Sat, 03 Mar 2001 07:58:25
> Books and READMEs just talk about patch-2.4.x.gz. How is the file
> patch-2.4.x.gz.sign used? Should I gunzip it and then apply patch?
by Tom » Sat, 03 Mar 2001 13:08:47
Quote:> Books and READMEs just talk about patch-2.4.x.gz. How is the file
> patch-2.4.x.gz.sign used? Should I gunzip it and then apply patch?
by jujubeesRUL » Sat, 03 Mar 2001 13:31:24
http://www.kernel.org/signature.html says it all.Quote:> Books and READMEs just talk about patch-2.4.x.gz. How is the file
> patch-2.4.x.gz.sign used? Should I gunzip it and then apply patch?
Import the key (example from site)
"gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 0x517D0F0E"
then verify (example from site)
"gpg --verify linux-2.3.9.tar.gz.sign linux-2.3.9.tar.gz"
by L Ta » Sun, 04 Mar 2001 23:59:52
L Tam
> > Books and READMEs just talk about patch-2.4.x.gz. How is the file
> > patch-2.4.x.gz.sign used? Should I gunzip it and then apply patch?
> http://www.kernel.org/signature.html says it all.
> Import the key (example from site)
> "gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 0x517D0F0E"
> then verify (example from site)
> "gpg --verify linux-2.3.9.tar.gz.sign linux-2.3.9.tar.gz"
1. Simple question on 5.0.5 Y2k Patch
Internally I am on SCO Enterprise 5.0.5m, and have several customers on
5.0.5. I have recently applied the y2k patch to several customers on
5.0.2-5.0.4, and became more aware that I should probably do the same thing
for 5.0.5, even though several 5.0.5 purchases were this year. It looks like
I install RS505a, then OSS600A. My confusion is from the 'm' as in 5.0.5m,
being a more 'recent' letter than the 'a' in RS505a. Do I just install these
two supplements on all 5.0.5 versions, regardless of the 'letter' appended
to the 5.0.5?
Thanks
Randy Willis
ALO Systems
2. Trident 3Dimage975 vs Xwindow
3. simple question about patches
4. Asus recommendations? A7A266
5. Simple kernel-lilo question
7. A simple question deserving a simple answer
8. hardware needed for solaris 10
9. a simple sed question ( there all simple :> )
10. Simple (?) question: Kernel compile error message.
11. Simple question from simple user
12. Simple FTP question (very simple)
13. a simple question about kernel config