Rockwell 56.6

Rockwell 56.6

Post by Paula Murph » Mon, 09 Mar 1998 04:00:00



Hi,
Does anyone know whether

Rockwell 56.6

or USR 56.6

is compatible with Linux

Thanks,

Paula

 
 
 

Rockwell 56.6

Post by Richard Bowma » Tue, 10 Mar 1998 04:00:00


Both will work fine. Since the 56K system is kept internal to the
modem, all Linux knows is that this is one heck of a fast modem.

Hope this helps
Richard Bowman

Quote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Messsage <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<


Rockwell 56.6:
Quote:

> Hi,
> Does anyone know whether

> Rockwell 56.6

> or USR 56.6

> is compatible with Linux

> Thanks,

> Paula


 
 
 

Rockwell 56.6

Post by Richard Stein » Tue, 10 Mar 1998 04:00:00



spake unto us, saying:

Quote:>Hi,
>Does anyone know whether

>Rockwell 56.6

>or USR 56.6

>is compatible with Linux

USR modems are fine as long as they are not "Winmodems".

--

           OS/2 Warp 4 + Linux + Executor = PC Hobbyist Heaven!
                   The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.

 
 
 

Rockwell 56.6

Post by James Kno » Tue, 10 Mar 1998 04:00:00




>Hi,
>Does anyone know whether

>Rockwell 56.6

>or USR 56.6

>is compatible with Linux

Doesn't make any difference, so long as they're not "Winmodems".  Also, the
new V.90 spec was approved a couple of weeks ago, so soon they'll all be
V.90.

 --

_________________________________________________________________________
The above opinions are my own and not those of ISM Corp., a subsidiary of
IBM Canada Ltd.

 
 
 

Rockwell 56.6

Post by Kenneth P. Turv » Wed, 11 Mar 1998 04:00:00





>>Hi,
>>Does anyone know whether

>>Rockwell 56.6

>>or USR 56.6

>>is compatible with Linux

>Doesn't make any difference, so long as they're not "Winmodems".  Also, the
>new V.90 spec was approved a couple of weeks ago, so soon they'll all be
>V.90.

So, was V.90 based on the Rockwell or the USR standard?

--

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be
construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
        -- Amendment IX to The United States Constitution

 
 
 

Rockwell 56.6

Post by Richard Stein » Wed, 11 Mar 1998 04:00:00



spake unto us, saying:

Quote:>So, was V.90 based on the Rockwell or the USR standard?

Yes.  :-)  (It's neither one, and I suspect it has bits of both in it).

--

           OS/2 Warp 4 + Linux + Executor = PC Hobbyist Heaven!
                   The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.

 
 
 

Rockwell 56.6

Post by James Kno » Thu, 12 Mar 1998 04:00:00




Quote:>So, was V.90 based on the Rockwell or the USR standard?

Yes.  :-)

--

_________________________________________________________________________
The above opinions are my own and not those of ISM Corp., a subsidiary of
IBM Canada Ltd.

 
 
 

Rockwell 56.6

Post by Neil Zanell » Fri, 13 Mar 1998 04:00:00


What is the V.90 standard and what oes it do for a modem?

Neil Zanella





> >>Hi,
> >>Does anyone know whether

> >>Rockwell 56.6

> >>or USR 56.6

> >>is compatible with Linux

> >Doesn't make any difference, so long as they're not "Winmodems".  Also, the
> >new V.90 spec was approved a couple of weeks ago, so soon they'll all be
> >V.90.

> So, was V.90 based on the Rockwell or the USR standard?

> --

> The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be
> construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
>    -- Amendment IX to The United States Constitution

 
 
 

Rockwell 56.6

Post by James Kno » Sat, 14 Mar 1998 04:00:00




>What is the V.90 standard and what oes it do for a modem?

There were two competing 56K technologies.  X2 from USR (3Com) and K56 from
Rockwell.  These were developed into the V.90 spec, which all new and most
older modems will use.

BTW, the 56K is the *MAXIMUM* theoretical limit.  Current regulations limit
it to 53K and line conditions further limit speed.  Also that is only in one
direction, downloading to the user.  Upload speed is still limited to 33.6K
max.  Furthermore, 56K works only if there are no analog portions to the
connection, other than the local loop to the user.  The provider must have
ISDN or better connections.

--

_________________________________________________________________________
The above opinions are my own and not those of ISM Corp., a subsidiary of
IBM Canada Ltd.

 
 
 

Rockwell 56.6

Post by Russ Pric » Mon, 16 Mar 1998 04:00:00


: There were two competing 56K technologies.  X2 from USR (3Com) and K56 from
: Rockwell.  These were developed into the V.90 spec, which all new and most
: older modems will use.

: BTW, the 56K is the *MAXIMUM* theoretical limit.  Current regulations limit
: it to 53K and line conditions further limit speed.

One thing to watch out for - V.90 is still beta - expected ratification
is slated for September '98, if I remember correctly.

My ISP activated V.90 for a little while; with my external USR 56K Faxmodem
(they dropped the "Sportster" name, but it's still a Sportster...), I
noticed a drop in throughput with V.90.  When FTP'ing compressed
files, I get about 5.2 KB/s with X2, but about 4.8 KB/s with V.90,
on the same line, dialing into the same local POP.

According to Stephen Schmidt of AIS, USR is being conservative with
initial V.90 code releases for their Total Control racks, which explains
the slowdown.

For the ex-Sportster, set S32=66 to disable V.90 while allowing X2.
For the Courier, set S58=32 for the same result.

--

(ANTI-SPAM ALERT: Remove the animal from my email address to reply to me.)

"  7:09am  up 94 days, 11:20,  1 user,  load average: 1.12, 1.03, 0.97"
- pokey, my Linux home firewall system, 26-Feb-98, before pulling the plug

Mooooove over, Komrade Klinton!  -  http://www.distributed.net/rc5/

 
 
 

Rockwell 56.6

Post by Bob Hau » Sun, 22 Mar 1998 04:00:00






>>Rockwell 56.6
>>or USR 56.6
>>is compatible with Linux

> Doesn't make any difference, so long as they're not "Winmodems".  Also, the
> new V.90 spec was approved a couple of weeks ago, so soon they'll all be
> V.90.

And a while that they will work again.

--

 Wasatch Communications Group               http://www.wasatch.com