Hi,
Does anyone know whether
Rockwell 56.6
or USR 56.6
is compatible with Linux
Thanks,
Paula
Hi,
Does anyone know whether
Rockwell 56.6
or USR 56.6
is compatible with Linux
Thanks,
Paula
Both will work fine. Since the 56K system is kept internal to the
modem, all Linux knows is that this is one heck of a fast modem.
Hope this helps
Richard Bowman
Quote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Messsage <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Quote:> Hi,
> Does anyone know whether
> Rockwell 56.6
> or USR 56.6
> is compatible with Linux
> Thanks,
> Paula
spake unto us, saying:
USR modems are fine as long as they are not "Winmodems".Quote:>Hi,
>Does anyone know whether
>Rockwell 56.6
>or USR 56.6
>is compatible with Linux
--
OS/2 Warp 4 + Linux + Executor = PC Hobbyist Heaven!
The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
>Hi,
>Does anyone know whether
>Rockwell 56.6
>or USR 56.6
>is compatible with Linux
--
_________________________________________________________________________
The above opinions are my own and not those of ISM Corp., a subsidiary of
IBM Canada Ltd.
>>Hi,
>>Does anyone know whether
>>Rockwell 56.6
>>or USR 56.6
>>is compatible with Linux
>Doesn't make any difference, so long as they're not "Winmodems". Also, the
>new V.90 spec was approved a couple of weeks ago, so soon they'll all be
>V.90.
--
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be
construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
-- Amendment IX to The United States Constitution
spake unto us, saying:
Yes. :-) (It's neither one, and I suspect it has bits of both in it).Quote:>So, was V.90 based on the Rockwell or the USR standard?
--
OS/2 Warp 4 + Linux + Executor = PC Hobbyist Heaven!
The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
Yes. :-)Quote:>So, was V.90 based on the Rockwell or the USR standard?
--
_________________________________________________________________________
The above opinions are my own and not those of ISM Corp., a subsidiary of
IBM Canada Ltd.
What is the V.90 standard and what oes it do for a modem?
Neil Zanella
> >>Hi,
> >>Does anyone know whether
> >>Rockwell 56.6
> >>or USR 56.6
> >>is compatible with Linux
> >Doesn't make any difference, so long as they're not "Winmodems". Also, the
> >new V.90 spec was approved a couple of weeks ago, so soon they'll all be
> >V.90.
> So, was V.90 based on the Rockwell or the USR standard?
> --
> The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be
> construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
> -- Amendment IX to The United States Constitution
>What is the V.90 standard and what oes it do for a modem?
BTW, the 56K is the *MAXIMUM* theoretical limit. Current regulations limit
it to 53K and line conditions further limit speed. Also that is only in one
direction, downloading to the user. Upload speed is still limited to 33.6K
max. Furthermore, 56K works only if there are no analog portions to the
connection, other than the local loop to the user. The provider must have
ISDN or better connections.
--
_________________________________________________________________________
The above opinions are my own and not those of ISM Corp., a subsidiary of
IBM Canada Ltd.
: There were two competing 56K technologies. X2 from USR (3Com) and K56 from
: Rockwell. These were developed into the V.90 spec, which all new and most
: older modems will use.
: BTW, the 56K is the *MAXIMUM* theoretical limit. Current regulations limit
: it to 53K and line conditions further limit speed.
One thing to watch out for - V.90 is still beta - expected ratification
is slated for September '98, if I remember correctly.
My ISP activated V.90 for a little while; with my external USR 56K Faxmodem
(they dropped the "Sportster" name, but it's still a Sportster...), I
noticed a drop in throughput with V.90. When FTP'ing compressed
files, I get about 5.2 KB/s with X2, but about 4.8 KB/s with V.90,
on the same line, dialing into the same local POP.
According to Stephen Schmidt of AIS, USR is being conservative with
initial V.90 code releases for their Total Control racks, which explains
the slowdown.
For the ex-Sportster, set S32=66 to disable V.90 while allowing X2.
For the Courier, set S58=32 for the same result.
--
(ANTI-SPAM ALERT: Remove the animal from my email address to reply to me.)
" 7:09am up 94 days, 11:20, 1 user, load average: 1.12, 1.03, 0.97"
- pokey, my Linux home firewall system, 26-Feb-98, before pulling the plug
Mooooove over, Komrade Klinton! - http://www.distributed.net/rc5/
> Doesn't make any difference, so long as they're not "Winmodems". Also, the
> new V.90 spec was approved a couple of weeks ago, so soon they'll all be
> V.90.
--
Wasatch Communications Group http://www.wasatch.com
1. Rockwell 56.6 DFV vs. USR 56.6 DFV
Hi,
I was wondering whether there is any difference between
the modems:
Rockwell 56.6 DFV
Sportster USR 56.6 DFV
By the way, what is DVF?
Paula,
2. ARCserve/Open Tape Server error
3. Modem (Rockwell 56.6 PCI data/fax) probs
6. Command Line
7. PC-TEL 56.6 internal modem problem!!!
10. 56.6 Kb simulated with 2 28.8Kb modems. Is it possible?
11. Anybody got a Rockwell PCI 56RVP modem to work with redhat 5.1
13. Help - Rockwell PCI V.90 Modem