Linux Red Hat Debian Slackware, what's best?

Linux Red Hat Debian Slackware, what's best?

Post by Paul Seel » Mon, 23 Dec 1996 04:00:00



[Posted and mailed]

Quote:> I have the option of
> purchasing some Linux distriution packages on CD-ROM.

> -Red Hat 2.0.3
> -Debian .93R6
> -Slackware 3.0

> Can anyone tell me which one is best?

These distributions are very outdated and you'd be better adviced to get
hold of more recent CD-ROM's. Try to purchase the latest InfoMagic Developers
Resource from December which should be available soon at some good bookstore
near you. It contains the latest of the aforementioned distributions:

 -Red Hat 4.0
 -Debian 1.2
 -Slackware 3.1 (latest?)

Don't consider Slackware but either RedHat or Debian. Slackware is a badly
maintained distribution and the other two can be upgraded without reinstall
of your complete system like you have to with Slackware. I personally consider
Debian to be most advanced in regard of package maintainance and overall
design and flexibility. I'd recommend to start with Debian and stay with it.
But don't bother trying Debian-0.93R6 as this is since long obsolete!

                                               Regards, P. *8^)
--

   African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
   Johannes Gutenberg-University   -  Forum 6  -  55099 Mainz/Germany
   Our AMA Homepage  in  the WWW at  http://www.uni-mainz.de/~bender/

 
 
 

Linux Red Hat Debian Slackware, what's best?

Post by E.P. Oerleman » Mon, 23 Dec 1996 04:00:00


I want to start experimenting with the Linux OS. I have the option of
purchasing some Linux distriution packages on CD-ROM.

-Red Hat 2.0.3
-Debian .93R6
-Slackware 3.0

Can anyone tell me which one is best?

Thanks in advance,

Edgar Oerlemans


 
 
 

Linux Red Hat Debian Slackware, what's best?

Post by Chris Fearnl » Mon, 23 Dec 1996 04:00:00



>I want to start experimenting with the Linux OS. I have the option of
>purchasing some Linux distriution packages on CD-ROM.

>-Red Hat 2.0.3
>-Debian .93R6
>-Slackware 3.0

>Can anyone tell me which one is best?

These are all ancient history.  If you are just playing around,
then any of them will be good.  If you have particular needs then one
may be better than another.  I prefer Debian for running ISP servers.
But Red Hat might get the nod if you were trying to penetrate corporate
headquarters.  Slackware is really only good if you already know UNIX
and are familiar with the "Slackware" approach (i.e., you have used it
before) or if you just want to fool around (there are too many out of
the box problems for newbies to mess with in production environments
unless you have good UNIX skills).

--
Christopher J. Fearnley            |    Nothin But Net System Engineering

http://www.netaxs.com/~cjf         |    (Philadelphia Area Computer Society)
ftp://ftp.netaxs.com/people/cjf    |    Design Science Revolutionary
"Dare to be Naive" -- Bucky Fuller |    Explorer in Universe

 
 
 

Linux Red Hat Debian Slackware, what's best?

Post by Jon Martin Solaa » Tue, 24 Dec 1996 04:00:00



> I want to start experimenting with the Linux OS. I have the option of
> purchasing some Linux distriution packages on CD-ROM.

> -Red Hat 2.0.3
> -Debian .93R6
> -Slackware 3.0

> Can anyone tell me which one is best?

All the distributions you mention are outdated. If you like to do
everything by hand, go for Slackware 3.1, otherwise go for Red Hat 4.0
or Debian. 1.2.

--
Jon Martin Solaas

 
 
 

Linux Red Hat Debian Slackware, what's best?

Post by Michael Loft » Tue, 24 Dec 1996 04:00:00


        Slack is at 4.0 now too I beleive....

Mike


>[Posted and mailed]

>> I have the option of
>> purchasing some Linux distriution packages on CD-ROM.

>> -Red Hat 2.0.3
>> -Debian .93R6
>> -Slackware 3.0

>> Can anyone tell me which one is best?

>These distributions are very outdated and you'd be better adviced to get
>hold of more recent CD-ROM's. Try to purchase the latest InfoMagic Developers
>Resource from December which should be available soon at some good bookstore
>near you. It contains the latest of the aforementioned distributions:

> -Red Hat 4.0
> -Debian 1.2
> -Slackware 3.1 (latest?)

>Don't consider Slackware but either RedHat or Debian. Slackware is a badly
>maintained distribution and the other two can be upgraded without reinstall
>of your complete system like you have to with Slackware. I personally consider
>Debian to be most advanced in regard of package maintainance and overall
>design and flexibility. I'd recommend to start with Debian and stay with it.
>But don't bother trying Debian-0.93R6 as this is since long obsolete!

>                                               Regards, P. *8^)
>--

>   African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
>   Johannes Gutenberg-University   -  Forum 6  -  55099 Mainz/Germany
>   Our AMA Homepage  in  the WWW at  http://www.uni-mainz.de/~bender/

 
 
 

Linux Red Hat Debian Slackware, what's best?

Post by Paul Seel » Tue, 24 Dec 1996 04:00:00




Quote:>    Slack is at 4.0 now too I beleive....

> Mike

[message which was without apparent reason quoted completely including the
 signature deleted...]

Thank you very much for informing us about your belief. Your message has
contributed considerably to our common knowledge. Have you ever heard about
this freely available document known as 'Netiquette'? Try a search with one
of these widespread WWW search engines.
                                           Nice Christmas! P. *8^)
--

   African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
   Johannes Gutenberg-University   -  Forum 6  -  55099 Mainz/Germany
   Our AMA Homepage  in  the WWW at  http://www.uni-mainz.de/~bender/

 
 
 

Linux Red Hat Debian Slackware, what's best?

Post by lance.. » Tue, 24 Dec 1996 04:00:00


hey what do you mean outdated? is there a mysterie linux distribution
floating around?? where do i get this??

 
 
 

Linux Red Hat Debian Slackware, what's best?

Post by Sergio River » Fri, 27 Dec 1996 04:00:00


: I want to start experimenting with the Linux OS. I have the option of
: purchasing some Linux distriution packages on CD-ROM.

: -Red Hat 2.0.3
: -Debian .93R6
: -Slackware 3.0

: Can anyone tell me which one is best?

: Thanks in advance,

: Edgar Oerlemans

get the Linux Developer Reasource at Infomagic and you can try them all.

Red Hat is a very good distribution, works out of the box, needs very few fixes,and easy to install, everything is very much automatic, recommended for users
new to unix, also recommend for users that do not want to spend a lot of time
fixing things, easy to upgrade, it seems to be the most complete distribution
.

Slackware is also a very good distribution, does not quite work out of the box,
needs usually a couple of fixes, everything is mostly manual, recommended to
users familiar with unix, once you have everything working slackware is a
very nice distribution,  you have total control of how you want things
set up, for learning unix, or adding software in non rpm format it is the
best distribution, slackware is a step forward compared to SLS, SLS was
a distribution with lots of bugs, small, and only old Linux users
had the displeasure of using it, slackware was paradise in comparison, now
SLS is obsolete or almost obsolete.

Debian, I heard it is a good distribution, but never tried it.

Caldera is basically red hat with some comercial software, like the looking
glass which is very nice, it is a little more expensive than red hat.

--
Sergio Riveros
http://www.unm.edu/~riveros