Development of a New GUI system for Linux...

Development of a New GUI system for Linux...

Post by Christopher Brow » Tue, 18 Nov 1997 04:00:00



On Mon, 17 Nov 1997 17:17:59 -0800, Ted Budzichowski


>Hello  Everyone!

>I would like to begin developing a new add-on for Linux that features a
>GUI.  My goals are to create an add-on OS that is backwards compatible
>with windows, Win95, DOS, and X.

>If anyone is interested, has comment, questions, or other input on the
>matter Please  write to me.

You might not want to recreate the wheel.

Here are a few projects seeking to provide this sort of thing:  (Ptah!
on HTML haters.  I am not going to reformat text grabbed from web
pages just for the sake of removing a couple of tags...)

<dt><a href="http://www.asgardpro.com/wine">WINE</a>

<dd>The WINdows Emulator is an increasingly capable system that seeks
to provide a scheme to allow one to run MS-Windows applications on
x86-based UNIX systems.

<dt><a href="http://www.sid-dis.com/freewin95">WOS - "Free Replacement
for Windows 95"</a>

<dd>I rather doubt that this one will work out; there's too much of
Windows95 that involves Non Disclosure Agreements and the likes, and
it's a hopelessly fast moving target...

<dt><a href="http://luna.bearnet.com/freedos/">FreeDOS</a>

There are others including Willows, BOCHS, as well as attempts to
build new GUIed environments such as Berlin, Display GhostScript,
OpenStep, GGI, that are all attempts to create something new that's
*better* than DOS/Windows/X.  (I'm dubious of the likelihood of some
of them actually *accomplishing* that goal; the fact that they intend
such remains...)
--

Have you contributed Your Fair Share to Linux?  For ideas, see:
<http://www.hex.net/~cbbrowne/lsf.html>

 
 
 

Development of a New GUI system for Linux...

Post by Vadim Zeitl » Wed, 19 Nov 1997 04:00:00


On Mon, 17 Nov 1997 17:17:59 -0800, Ted Budzichowski


>Hello  Everyone!

>I would like to begin developing a new add-on for Linux that features a
>GUI.  My goals are to create an add-on OS that is backwards compatible
>with windows, Win95, DOS, and X.

 I don't really understand what does "add-on OS backward compatible with
windows..." means, but if you just want to have a GUI program which could
run under both Windows (3.1/95/NT) and X you might have a look at
wxWindows (http://web.ukonline.co.uk/julian.smart/wxwin/).

 Regards,
VZ

 
 
 

Development of a New GUI system for Linux...

Post by tbudz.. » Thu, 20 Nov 1997 04:00:00


It was stated that "I might not want to recreate the wheel"
I will try to anyway.  I feel that X has restrictions that it shouldn't.

WINE was mentioned as an alternitive, but it is not a built feature any
OS and is less efficient than desired.  I will however try to make use
of the hard work that has gone into WINE.  

I ask now that people please make only suggestions that would be helpful
to my work.  I am not interrested in working on another project and
unless it is of  value to my work please don't mention it.


If you have experiance in the Linux Kernel, GUI programming, WINE
development, or anything else use I encourage you to help.

Programming isn't the only thing needed!  Anyone  who thinks they may be
of help contact me.

 
 
 

Development of a New GUI system for Linux...

Post by Michael W. Ry » Fri, 21 Nov 1997 04:00:00


[snip]

Quote:> I ask now that people please make only suggestions that would be helpful
> to my work.  I am not interrested in working on another project and
> unless it is of  value to my work please don't mention it.

I think part of the problem is that people aren't too sure what you're
trying to do.  I know I'm not.  Are you trying to create another GUI
toolkit (like Qt, Xforms, GTk, etc.), or a whole new windowing system
(like X), or a whole new emulator (like WINE).  Please don't take this
as a flame (it's not meant as one), but your English is a little
unclear and is probably what's causing some of the confusion.

Also, if you're intending to reinvent the wheel, why?  Please be more
explicit than just stating that you think X is more restrictive than
it should be.

--
Michael W. Ryan

PGP fingerprint: 7B E5 75 7F 24 EE 19 35  A5 DF C3 45 27 B5 DB DF