Basic Questions

Basic Questions

Post by Emil Engstr? » Sun, 17 May 1998 04:00:00



Im about to examine some different OS, tried out NT, Win95 so far. Now
heading for LINUX and
then OS/2 I think. They say LINUX is really great and that is one of the
few OS increasing in popularity,right? I should apprechiate some simple
information;
How much disc-space is required by RH5 ?
I heard it comes on two CDs ?
Are there any major advantages of using LINUX instead of win95?
Where can I get applications to LINUX, such as C++ and Java compilers,
emailclients etc etc ?
Please mail me at :

 
 
 

Basic Questions

Post by Frank Sweetse » Sun, 17 May 1998 04:00:00



> Im about to examine some different OS, tried out NT, Win95 so far. Now
> heading for LINUX and
> then OS/2 I think. They say LINUX is really great and that is one of the
> few OS increasing in popularity,right? I should apprechiate some simple
> information;

well, i think it's an excellent operating system.  it tends to require a
little more work, in particular because it virtually no similarity to most
of the other desktop os's (mac's, win95, etc) being a unix.

Quote:> How much disc-space is required by RH5 ?

500M should give you a good, basic working system.

Quote:> I heard it comes on two CDs ?

the first binary is for the install, and contains all the programs.  the
second one contains source code for (almost) all of programs.

Quote:> Are there any major advantages of using LINUX instead of win95?

it's much more stable, flexible, featurefull, moves a lot faster, you'll
end up learning a lot more about your machine and how it works, and it's
free.

Quote:> Where can I get applications to LINUX, such as C++ and Java compilers,
> emailclients etc etc ?

nearly all of the applications for linux are free as well, and come with
the distribution.

here's some good web sites to get started on

www.linux.org
sunsite.unc.edu/LDP
www.redhat.com
www.debian.org
www.cheapbytes.com

--
Frank Sweetser rasmusin at wpi.edu fsweetser at blee.net | PGP key available
paramount.res.wpi.net RH 5.0 kernel 2.0.33/2.1.102  i586 | at public servers
"...Unix, MS-DOS, and Windows NT (also known as the Good, the Bad, and
the Ugly)."
(By Matt Welsh)

 
 
 

Basic Questions

Post by Stephen Joseph Poll » Sun, 17 May 1998 04:00:00


: Im about to examine some different OS, tried out NT, Win95 so far. Now
: heading for LINUX and
: then OS/2 I think. They say LINUX is really great and that is one of the
: few OS increasing in popularity,right? I should apprechiate some simple
: information;
: How much disc-space is required by RH5 ?
I'd recommend any where from 200meg-1gig depending on what all you want to
stuff it with.
: I heard it comes on two CDs ?
Yes one with the binaries and one with the source.
: Are there any major advantages of using LINUX instead of win95?
Yes, more stable, opensource, less bloat, less restrictive etc.
: Where can I get applications to LINUX, such as C++ and Java compilers,
Well gcc(gnu c/c++ compiler) comes with it by default. I don't follow java
that much so I don't know where you can get the best java compiler for it.
: emailclients etc etc ?
pine works great for me YMMV
Take a look at http://www.linux.org/ and http://sunsite.unc.edu/LDP
Last url may be wrong I'm always forgeting where sunsite is.
: Please mail me at :

:

 
 
 

Basic Questions

Post by James Campbell Andr » Mon, 18 May 1998 04:00:00


Quote:> : Where can I get applications to LINUX, such as C++ and Java compilers,
> Well gcc(gnu c/c++ compiler) comes with it by default. I don't follow java
> that much so I don't know where you can get the best java compiler for it.

Java 1.1.3 (I think) comes with it. As do C, C++, Pascal, Assembly and
BASIC.

I've just installed it on a Pentium P60 (old bit of kit) with 16MB RAM
and a 3.2Gb drive. I think I can fairly say that it run X-Windows as
fast (if not faster) as W95 on a P150. Mind you that's just my
impression, I havn't done any sort of benchmarking.

Go for it - it's *cheap* if nothing else!

Jim
--

http://www.october.u-net.com      |     a Total Enthusiasm Failure
The Official Site & Gig Guide  For |     and must exit immediately.
           B R E A T H E           |        [[ OK ]]   [ CANCEL ]

 
 
 

Basic Questions

Post by Matt Gushe » Sat, 23 May 1998 04:00:00



> Im about to examine some different OS, tried out NT, Win95 so far. Now
> heading for LINUX and
> then OS/2 I think. They say LINUX is really great and that is one of the
> few OS increasing in popularity,right?

Funny you should mention OS/2. I used Warp for about 2 years, and I
still miss some things about it. OS/2's Workplace Shell is, in my
opinion, by far the best-designed GUI in existence (excuse me while I
run to get my asbestos suit). Drag-n-Drop and context
menus work the way God intended them to. So why did I switch to Linux?

1) There just weren't enough native applications for OS/2. People say
the same thing about Linux, but it's not true (unless you want to do,
say, DTP --- there is no equivalent to PageMaker or QuarkXpress for
Linux -- yet).

2) OS/2 is seriously lacking in end-user support. Ask IBM? Their
people are very nice, but it's kinda hard to find anyone who knows
OS/2. Ask a newsgroup? I've tried it a few times, but noone ever
answered my questions. Search the web? Pretty slim pickings. There are
a very few excellent OS/2 sites, but most of the others haven't been
updated since 1994 or so. As you may be finding out, there's no
problem getting the info you need about Linux.

To sum it up, OS/2 is a great OS -- and the fact that it's not
widely-used or well-supported is tragic, but nonetheless true. Maybe
IBM just had bad timing or something. Linux is also a great OS -- and
it seems to be in the right place at the right time.

Okay, now you can flame me (not that I intend to respond ;-)

Matt Gushee
Oshamanbe, Hokkaido, Japan

 
 
 

Basic Questions

Post by jgare » Sat, 23 May 1998 04:00:00


  I agree O/S 2 is a great operating system,  though I use Linux, and will
continue to do so,  I still think O/S 2 is great.  Much better than that
other GUI operating system.  Hell XFree86 has even been ported to O/S 2 and
for any O/S 2 users who might have inadvertantly wandered in and for all you
other linux users you might want to point your browser to the PowerIUsers BBS
web page.  Tons of links to all things great for Linux, O/S2, and X.
Have fun.

 
 
 

Basic Questions

Post by Richard Stein » Mon, 25 May 1998 04:00:00



spake unto us, saying:

Quote:>Funny you should mention OS/2. I used Warp for about 2 years, and I
>still miss some things about it. OS/2's Workplace Shell is, in my
>opinion, by far the best-designed GUI in existence (excuse me while
>I run to get my asbestos suit).

No need for that -- it's absolutely true.  :-)  Well, except for the
little SIQ problem, but we won't talk about that.  ;-)

Quote:>So why did I switch to Linux?

>1) There just weren't enough native applications for OS/2. People say
>the same thing about Linux, but it's not true (unless you want to do,
>say, DTP --- there is no equivalent to PageMaker or QuarkXpress for
>Linux -- yet).

Hey, I use slrn and lynx on OS/2, and GIMP is slowly being ported to
XFree86/2 (I have alpha 3, and it actually works!).  It really depends
on what you want to do.  In some cases, you're right.

Quote:>2) OS/2 is seriously lacking in end-user support. Ask IBM? Their
>people are very nice, but it's kinda hard to find anyone who knows
>OS/2. Ask a newsgroup? I've tried it a few times, but noone ever
>answered my questions.

Where did you ask?  I've always found the comp.os.os2.* hierarchy to be
a good resource, though not as active now as they were two years ago.

Oh well.  Linux is good also.  Much better in some ways, but not quite
as good as the WPS yet in GUI-land.  Perhaps in time!  :-)

--

           OS/2 Warp 4 + Linux + Executor = PC Hobbyist Heaven!
                   The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.

 
 
 

1. Newbie basic questions... many questions

Here is a challenge:

I need to start using Linux for several reasons (too many to enumerate...).
I have never used Linux or Unix for that matter. Even the "language" used by
everyone describing steps or recommendations is foreign to me. I have
extensive knowledge of (cough, cough)  Windows 9X and NT but no Unix
experience of any kind.

So here are some of my questions:

1- Is there a good FAQ list that I could start with instead of pestering
everyone with my questions?

2- At the same time that I start with the FAQ, I would like to take a crack
at installing Linux. I've done some research and apparently all my hardware
is compatible (at least with RedHat). What is the best use of my dollars?
RedHat? Slackware? Or are there any others that I may want to look at? At
this stage I don't need the most powerful or the fastest implementation just
the easiest to install. Is there a site that compares the different
implementations?

3- Are there specialized FAQs for some of the more "arcane" subjects: for
example network or performance issues?

At this time I would rather be pointed to where these issues are addressed
instead of being told what to do ( not that I wouldn't welcome the answers
:-)

Thank You

ps: if I committed a "faux pass" by asking these questions in the wrong
newsgroup, please just point me to the correct one. Thanks

2. buggy xterm

3. Basic Question, please advise

4. Diamond Monster Sound Support?

5. security for many users... (basic question)

6. Hard disk install Solaris 8

7. Linux Networking Very Basic Question

8. Motif: 2 get or not 2 get?

9. Basic Question: How to make a boot disk?

10. Linux newbie w/basic questions

11. Setting up a Linux Server - Basic Question

12. basic question

13. Very basic questions on setting up sendmail