Hardware stability (was: Linux stability???)

Hardware stability (was: Linux stability???)

Post by nu.. » Sun, 05 Apr 1998 04:00:00




>I always heard that the great thing about Linux was that applications
>may crash, but they'll never take down the system as with Windows.  But
>two or three times in the last week, an application has frozen and
>forced me to reboot.  Once with Applixware, once with WINE, and once
>when perhaps I opened up to o many apps at once (is this possible)??

1. I had similar problems with one of machines at work.
   Somebody adviced me to loop kernel compilation.
   It turned out, that the machine had defect hardware (memory),
   because compilation was giving errors at RANDOM places.

2. I had no other crush cases with Linux. (Well, when I was a newbie,
   sometimes I pressed RESET without trying to think of something better.
   Ms Win customs die hard :-)

I dont have applixware, but Wine (when I used it), never crushed
the system.

It is interesting to note, that even after crushing due to bad memory,
Linux continued to receive pings correctly!

Roman Suzi

 --        http://sampo.karelia.ru/~rnd        --
--  Roman A. Suzi * Petrozavodsk Karelia Russia --

 
 
 

Hardware stability (was: Linux stability???)

Post by Christopher B. Brow » Mon, 06 Apr 1998 05:00:00




Quote:>It is interesting to note, that even after crushing due to bad memory,
>Linux continued to receive pings correctly!

That is probably because the network card is by itself intelligent enough to
respond to pings.  This isn't necessarily a Linux feature...

--
Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.  
-- Henry Spencer          <http://www.hex.net/~cbbrowne/lsf.html>


 
 
 

Hardware stability (was: Linux stability???)

Post by nu.. » Mon, 06 Apr 1998 05:00:00




>>It is interesting to note, that even after crushing due to bad memory,
>>Linux continued to receive pings correctly!

>That is probably because the network card is by itself intelligent enough to
>respond to pings.  This isn't necessarily a Linux feature...

Cheapest and silliest NE2000 is so smart as to react to pings
on its own???
I doubt it.

Roman Suzi

 --        http://sampo.karelia.ru/~rnd        --
--  Roman A. Suzi * Petrozavodsk Karelia Russia --
 --  This letter was mailed from Mim for Linux --

 
 
 

1. Stability of Powermac G4 hardware

Hi!

I have a Powerbook G3 and I am quite happy with it. In a couple of weeks we
will buy a new webserver and I am wondering if a Powermac G4 would be a
good choice.
This will be a mission-critical server, so reliability and stability is the
most important thing.

The other reason we consider a G4 is because most buffer-overflow-exploits
should not work on a PPC. (at least most crackers would need PPC-hardware
or a cross-compiler)

Would you recommend a G4 as a webserver?
Any known problems?

Roland();

2. Unix Program to Show C Function Dependencies?

3. Win stability versus Linux & VIBRA 128 PCI

4. DNS Internet Document?

5. Linux stability.

6. Method to convert delimiter in command line expansion

7. TCP/IP Stability & Performance: Linux vs FreeBSD

8. Diskless-PC does not boot Linux via 3c905c NIC :-(

9. KT133 and linux compability / stability

10. What to do about win apps when wanting linux stability?

11. Best PCI 10/100 Mbps NIC in terms of reliability and stability (for Linux, of course)

12. linux vs freebsd in stability?

13. Linux: Kernel Stability