I believe not. Sun's upgrade path was 2.5.1 -> 2.6 -> 7 -> 8Quote:>I have a client with a Solaris 2.51 workstation used as a mail server with
>an open relay problem. We have decided to upgrade to Solaris 8, which we
>understand has better features for the prevention of spamming. I has vast
>SCO/AT&T/NCR and other System V experience, but very little Solaris
>experience. I am seeking general info on the upgrade, such as:
>Will Solaris 8 overlay 2.51, or must it be installed from scratch?
So you will need to upgrade to 2.6 first if you want to use Sun's
Solaris Upgrade procedure.
Sendmail, yes, to some extent. Sun's upgrade procedure preservesQuote:>Will user account/sendmail/networking, etc. need to be reconfigured?
Yes, if you install *everything* that comes with 8. ProbablyQuote:>Does Solaris 8 require much more resources that 2.51 such as memory, disk
>space, CPU power?
= - =
The cleanest, most secure option would be to perform backups, esp.
of the passwd/group/shadow/hosts information, wipe the machine clean,
perform a *minimal* installation of Solaris 8 *without* sendmail.
Then install postfix (or qmail depending on your preference).
postfix has the benefit of being a bit more sendmail-compatible
and easier-to-understand. qmail is possibly more scalable if
you move hundreds of thousands of mail messages per day.
http://www.postfix.org/
http://www.qmail.org/
Both postfix and qmail have been engineered from-the-ground-up
to be secure. The same cannot necessarily be said of sendmail.
-=- D. J.
Any upgrade you do will not necessarily fix your sendmail problem. YouQuote:> I have a client with a Solaris 2.51 workstation used as a mail server with
> an open relay problem. We have decided to upgrade to Solaris 8, which we
> understand has better features for the prevention of spamming. I has vast
> SCO/AT&T/NCR and other System V experience, but very little Solaris
> experience. I am seeking general info on the upgrade, such as:
> Will Solaris 8 overlay 2.51, or must it be installed from scratch?
> Will user account/sendmail/networking, etc. need to be reconfigured?
> Does Solaris 8 require much more resources that 2.51 such as memory, disk
> space, CPU power?
> Thank you very much,
> Michael
If you want to go through with upgrading to Solaris 8, you may want
to just get another disk and do a new install of Solaris 8 on the
new disk (it helps if you have another otherwise identical computer
to do the install on). Then you'll have a bigger disk, be able to
repartition if needed, and will still have the old disk with Solaris
2.5.1 to use (to continue service and as a reference of configuration)
while you are configuring the new disk with Solaris 8.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timothy J. Lee
Unsolicited bulk or commercial email is not welcome.
No warranty of any kind is provided with this message.
Quote:> You can download gcc from http://www.sunfreeware.com to compile
> sendmail. But the computer must have the header files and libraries
> installed (SUNWCprog or SUNWCall when initially installed, or the
> packages added later).
> If you want to go through with upgrading to Solaris 8, you may want
> to just get another disk and do a new install of Solaris 8 on the
> new disk (it helps if you have another otherwise identical computer
> to do the install on). Then you'll have a bigger disk, be able to
> repartition if needed, and will still have the old disk with Solaris
> 2.5.1 to use (to continue service and as a reference of configuration)
> while you are configuring the new disk with Solaris 8.
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Timothy J. Lee
> Unsolicited bulk or commercial email is not welcome.
> No warranty of any kind is provided with this message.
--
[Trim the no-bots from my address to reply to me by email!]
[ Do NOT email-CC me on posts. Pick one or the other.]
The word of the day is mispergitude
The GNU libc would have the headers and libraries, but again it is
safer and easier to use the Solaris headers and libraries on Solaris.
All of these (the Solaris /usr/ccs/bin tools, headers, and libraries)
should be on the Solaris CD to be pkgadd-ed. However, the hard part
may be finding which of the packages include all of these things, and
possibly finding disk space for it all. If that is too much of a problem,
get a new hard drive and install Solaris 8 on it (with SUNWCall cluster
to avoid this type of problem in the future).
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timothy J. Lee
Unsolicited bulk or commercial email is not welcome.
No warranty of any kind is provided with this message.
I don't know if Sun has changed this for Solaris 8 and above but forQuote:> I wanted to just upgrade sendmail, but there is no compiler on this system.
> I am more familiar with SCO Unix than Solaris, and I know that a c compiler
> for SCO must be purchased separately. Is this also true of Solaris 2.51, or
> is a license for the compiler included but perhaps just not installed?
> Thank you for your help.
> Michael
Hello,
I am new to this group and I apologize if this question has already been
posted. Has anyone experienced any problems upgrading from Solaris 2.5 to
2.51 on a Sparc5. The machine I am looking to upgrade is running INN and
BIND primarily and I would like to be as sure as possible that I won't run
into any known problems.
Thanks for Whatever help you can offer.
Marc.
2. Compiling Crack on Solaris 2.6
3. Upgrading Solaris 2.4 -> 2.51?
5. Compare Solaris 2.51 against Solaris 2.50 ??
7. upgrade from 2.51 to 2.6 !!
8. mod_javascript for Apache ?
9. Upgrade from 2.51 to 2.6 on E450
10. upgrading from 2.51 to 2.6!!
11. Did you upgrade from 2.51 x86 to 2.6???
13. Creating Partitions on SOlaris 2.51