Clustering Sun: Sun cluster or Veritas?

Clustering Sun: Sun cluster or Veritas?

Post by Toni » Fri, 20 Aug 2004 01:06:05



Any of you have experience with Sun Cluster software and/or Veritas
Cluster?

I have worked with IBMS HACMP but none of the other solutions.  Even
that was fairly simple active/passive clusters, nothing too fancy.

Any pros/cons to running either Suns cluster software or Veritas' on
Sun systems? Probably either V880s or V1280s.  I have been looking at
the docs. on Suns site about Sun Cluster 3.1 but of course that is
just technical info, always best to hear from others with real
experience too :)

TIA.

 
 
 

Clustering Sun: Sun cluster or Veritas?

Post by Klaus Gro » Fri, 20 Aug 2004 17:13:12



> Any of you have experience with Sun Cluster software and/or Veritas
> Cluster?

> I have worked with IBMS HACMP but none of the other solutions.  Even
> that was fairly simple active/passive clusters, nothing too fancy.

> Any pros/cons to running either Suns cluster software or Veritas' on
> Sun systems? Probably either V880s or V1280s.  I have been looking at
> the docs. on Suns site about Sun Cluster 3.1 but of course that is
> just technical info, always best to hear from others with real
> experience too :)

> TIA.

Hey,

this is an endless discussion. I think, the Sun cluster is
fully integrated in Solaris (8/9/10), the Veritas cluster
has some more features and is easy to administrate.
Im certified on borh clusters, on smaller systems i prefer
Veritas on bigger systems (4800 and up) i prefer Sun cluster.

Best wishes
Klaus Grote
DNS GmbH

 
 
 

Clustering Sun: Sun cluster or Veritas?

Post by Klaus Gro » Fri, 20 Aug 2004 17:13:28



> Any of you have experience with Sun Cluster software and/or Veritas
> Cluster?

> I have worked with IBMS HACMP but none of the other solutions.  Even
> that was fairly simple active/passive clusters, nothing too fancy.

> Any pros/cons to running either Suns cluster software or Veritas' on
> Sun systems? Probably either V880s or V1280s.  I have been looking at
> the docs. on Suns site about Sun Cluster 3.1 but of course that is
> just technical info, always best to hear from others with real
> experience too :)

> TIA.

Hey,

this is an endless discussion. I think, the Sun cluster is
fully integrated in Solaris (8/9/10), the Veritas cluster
has some more features and is easy to administrate.
Im certified on borh clusters, on smaller systems i prefer
Veritas on bigger systems (4800 and up) i prefer Sun cluster.

Best wishes
Klaus Grote
DNS GmbH

 
 
 

Clustering Sun: Sun cluster or Veritas?

Post by Klaus Gro » Fri, 20 Aug 2004 17:13:45



> Any of you have experience with Sun Cluster software and/or Veritas
> Cluster?

> I have worked with IBMS HACMP but none of the other solutions.  Even
> that was fairly simple active/passive clusters, nothing too fancy.

> Any pros/cons to running either Suns cluster software or Veritas' on
> Sun systems? Probably either V880s or V1280s.  I have been looking at
> the docs. on Suns site about Sun Cluster 3.1 but of course that is
> just technical info, always best to hear from others with real
> experience too :)

> TIA.

Hey,

this is an endless discussion. I think, the Sun cluster is
fully integrated in Solaris (8/9/10), the Veritas cluster
has some more features and is easy to administrate.
Im certified on borh clusters, on smaller systems i prefer
Veritas on bigger systems (4800 and up) i prefer Sun cluster.

Best wishes
Klaus Grote
DNS GmbH

 
 
 

Clustering Sun: Sun cluster or Veritas?

Post by Przemek Ba » Fri, 20 Aug 2004 18:45:10




> > Any of you have experience with Sun Cluster software and/or Veritas
> > Cluster?

> > I have worked with IBMS HACMP but none of the other solutions.  Even
> > that was fairly simple active/passive clusters, nothing too fancy.

> > Any pros/cons to running either Suns cluster software or Veritas' on
> > Sun systems? Probably either V880s or V1280s.  I have been looking at
> > the docs. on Suns site about Sun Cluster 3.1 but of course that is
> > just technical info, always best to hear from others with real
> > experience too :)

> > TIA.

>  Hey,

>  this is an endless discussion. I think, the Sun cluster is
>  fully integrated in Solaris (8/9/10), the Veritas cluster
>  has some more features and is easy to administrate.
>  Im certified on borh clusters, on smaller systems [1] i prefer
>  Veritas on bigger systems [2] (4800 and up) i prefer Sun cluster.

Why [1] and why [2] ?

przemol

 
 
 

Clustering Sun: Sun cluster or Veritas?

Post by zombi » Fri, 20 Aug 2004 20:18:39


Quote:

>Any pros/cons to running either Suns cluster software or Veritas' on
>Sun systems? Probably either V880s or V1280s.  I have been looking at
>the docs.

Worked with the older versions of sun cluster, not so familiar with the newer
versions of SUN cluster. Currently running both Veritas Cluster Server 2.0 and
Veritas cluster server 4.0.

Here is my 2 cents...

Sun cluster software must have been designed by some electrical engineer,
especially their heartbeat mechanism with the terminal server between the
multiple hosts,etc..(this is on the old clusters, not sure what it is like on
the new one.)

The overall design of the Veritas Cluster Server is just excellent. The way
their heart beat is designed and the way the hosts in a cluster communicate the
config information and maintain a consistent environment is just amazing. They
have their own proprietary protocol for the heartbeat and configuration
management over the heartbeat links ( LLT and GAB ).

The VCS configuration, is simple and easy to understand and easy to configure.
The administration GUI is excellent. Overall a great product. I have been
running VCS clusters for the last 4 years and have had no trouble with them.

Strongly recommend using VCS. Unless you have a very high end sun system and sun
has integrated some of the hardware failover into the cluster design for the
15K, 10K etc range of systems. I am not familiar with the high end systems and
won't be able to weigh in the benifits of the proprietary integration that sun
has implemented on the higher end systems. ( This is probably the reason why
another gentlemen who posted a reply to your message mentioned using sun cluster
if it is a high end sun system. )

For a 440/880/1280 VCS should kick ass, without any problems.

-Zombie

 
 
 

Clustering Sun: Sun cluster or Veritas?

Post by Scott Howar » Fri, 20 Aug 2004 21:29:16



> Worked with the older versions of sun cluster, not so familiar with the newer
> versions of SUN cluster. Currently running both Veritas Cluster Server 2.0 and
> Veritas cluster server 4.0.

Sun Cluster 3.x is completely different to Sun Cluster 2.x. There are more
differences between the two versions than there are similarities.

Quote:> Sun cluster software must have been designed by some electrical engineer,
> especially their heartbeat mechanism with the terminal server between the
> multiple hosts,etc..(this is on the old clusters, not sure what it is like on
> the new one.)

The heartbeat stuff, as well as the need to have a terminal server is all
gone with Sun Cluster 3.x

Quote:> Strongly recommend using VCS. Unless you have a very high end sun system and sun
> has integrated some of the hardware failover into the cluster design for the
> 15K, 10K etc range of systems. I am not familiar with the high end systems and
> won't be able to weigh in the benifits of the proprietary integration that sun
> has implemented on the higher end systems. ( This is probably the reason why

"proprietary integration" ? Cluster on the high-end machines works in
exactly the same way as it does on the lower-end machines. There's nothing
special in the standard hardware or Solaris which acts differently.

There is one specific product which can have an impact on cluster configs,
being the WildCat interconnect boards, but that's an extra which is
just for better performance - it's neither required, built in, or used
in a standard HA cluster config.

Quote:> For a 440/880/1280 VCS should kick ass, without any problems.

Ditto Sun Cluster.

Obviously I'm a bit biased towards SC, and I've never actually run VCS
in anger, but I suspect either will do the job you're after without
any poblems.

Sun Cluster has the advantages of single-vendor support (same vendor
for OS, hardware and cluster) as well as tighter integration with the
OS.  VCS has the advantages of slightly more flexibility (although
this is both an advantage and a disadvantage), cross-platform
administration (but ask yourself if that's really an advantage - it
depends on the environment).

Personally I'd recommend SC3, but like I said, I'm a little biased  -
especially as I've installed 9x 2-node SC3 clusters in the past 2 weeks :)

  Scott.

 
 
 

Clustering Sun: Sun cluster or Veritas?

Post by PE2DO » Sat, 21 Aug 2004 01:25:04



Quote:> Any of you have experience with Sun Cluster software and/or Veritas
> Cluster?

> I have worked with IBMS HACMP but none of the other solutions.  Even
> that was fairly simple active/passive clusters, nothing too fancy.

> Any pros/cons to running either Suns cluster software or Veritas' on
> Sun systems? Probably either V880s or V1280s.  I have been looking at
> the docs. on Suns site about Sun Cluster 3.1 but of course that is
> just technical info, always best to hear from others with real
> experience too :)

> TIA.

At the moment being sysadmin for 2x SC3.0 system running on 6800's and also
busy installing VCS 4.0 on 2xV480.
I like VCS much more, resource dependecies are much clearer in VCS,
installation is easier, GUI's are better (for those that use GUI's). AFAIK
you can download them both. Just pick 2 old machines and cluster them and
see what you like best. If you can't download Veritas, contact them or a
reseller and they can give you an evaluation version.

Good luck in choosing,

Marc

 
 
 

1. Sun Cluster + QFS or Sun Cluster + Veritas

Right now I've got some 3.5 Veritas Clusters running Oracle8
that are due for an upgrade.

I'm playing around with the idea of getting rid of all of
our Veritas software and replacing it with Sun software
(since cluster is now free).

So it would be:

Solaris 10 (01/06 HW release, latest patches)
Sun Volume Manager
MPXIO
QFS
Sun Cluster 3.1

I've used Veritas for so long now & am weary of mixing it in
with Sun Cluster.  Ideally - I'd like to just go with one vendor
for my clustering.

Is MPXIO comparable to DMP?  Are people actually running Sun volume
manager under production Oracle DB's?  I've used SVM for mirroring
boot drives on web servers and app servers but never in the database
tier.

I've read that QFS can do the volume management all on it's own -
is that what people are typically using with Sun Clusters?

I'm reading the FAQs and white papers right now but would love to
hear from some people with real world experience with the stuff.

-Sanjay

2. mounting a unix filesystem on a pc

3. Sun Cluster 3.0 vs Veritas Cluster Server

4. Upgrading Video Card - Do I have to use "nvidia" drivers?

5. Veritas Cluster versus SUN Cluster

6. HELP_! I forgot my root password, does anyone have a crack ??? PLEASE !

7. Best Practices "Migrating Veritas VCS Cluster to SUN Cluster"

8. Arghh - Xconfig for Speed

9. VERITAS cluster server vs. SUN cluster -- Any recommendations ?

10. Veritas clustering vs SUN clustering

11. New Whitepaper: Sun Cluster 3.0 Cluster File System

12. Solaris Clusters - Solstice HA 1.2, 1.3 / Sun Cluster PDB etc.

13. Sun ( or Veritas ) cluster for Autosys Server