> Hi everyone, I need some quick advice. IYHO which would be a better
> machine to purchase granted that I have limited funds and want to
> spend no more than $1000 on a sparc machine.
> 1) New SunBlade 100 - $795 + $135/for 512MB Ram
> 2) Used Ultra 10 / 333 - $800
> Comes with 512 MB, Sun Raid Controller, two SCSI 10 GB HDDs, 3D
> Creator Graphics card.
> They both seem to be about the same price although I think that the
> Ultra 10 will give me more bang for my buck.
> Thanks!
> Paul
Given the choice among the two, I would go with SunBlade 100.
SunBlade 100 has a faster CPU (yeah, I know what other say
about smaller cache, but still faster overall performance), and it
is using "standard" PC components. You can upgrade your memory
for the Sunblade 100 *A LOT* cheaper than for Ultra10/Ultra5,
for example.
SunBlade 100 is supported by Sun, and Ultra10 is EOL (end-of-life).
The "Sun Raid Controller", well, I think you mistake that for a
SCSI controller (a plan-old-SCSI controller). You can get a Symbio
SCSI card for cheap ($50 or so). The 2 10-Gbyte SCSI drives are
old drives any way....
You get a built-in 24-bit graphics card for SunBlade 100 (with 8 Mbyte
or RAM), and the Creator 3D (not to be confused with Creator ) has
16 Mbyte of RAM. Personally, I don't see any difference between the
two cards. I have a Sunblade 100 and an Ultra60.
I would choose SunBlade100 over Ultra10. In addition, The CPU for
SunBlade100 is a single-chip processor (like a Pentium CPU), and
you upgrade the CPU later (when faster one is available), and/or you
can overclock it if you want cheap-performance.