___________________
/| /| | |
||__|| | Please do |
/ O O\__ NOT |
/ \ feed the |
/ \ \ trolls |
/ _ \ \ ______________|
/ |\____\ \ ||
/ | | | |\____/ ||
/ \|_|_|/ \ __||
/ / \ |____| ||
/ | | /| | --|
| | |// |____ --|
* _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
*-- _--\ _ \ // |
/ _ \\ _ // | /
* / \_ /- | - | |
* ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________
--
Rich Teer, SCNA, SCSA, OpenSolaris CAB member
President,
Rite Online Inc.
Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URL: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
>>After that big Solaris 10 marketing blitz campaign over a year ago about
>> how Solaris 10 is going to revolutionize your life with this, and that
>>and blah blah blah and nothing materializes but a prototype of something
>>yet to come in the real release of Solaris 11 it's just that: blah.
>>Speculation. Make sure you hold your breath for ZFS.
> Fool.
> ___________________
> /| /| | |
> ||__|| | Please do |
> / O O\__ NOT |
> / \ feed the |
> / \ \ trolls |
> / _ \ \ ______________|
> / |\____\ \ ||
> / | | | |\____/ ||
> / \|_|_|/ \ __||
> / / \ |____| ||
> / | | /| | --|
> | | |// |____ --|
> * _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
> *-- _--\ _ \ // |
> / _ \\ _ // | /
> * / \_ /- | - | |
> * ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________
I think it was pretty clear that ZFS would not make Solaris 10's initialQuote:>Sorry Dude, not a troll, long time Solaris user and fan just p'off with
>the garbage being fed from the marketing machine on S10 and mad at
>myself because I chomped on S10 when I knew better.
ZFS will show up in S10, not just S11.
Casper
as was this comment.Quote:> ZFS will show up in S10, not just S11.
--
Thomas E.*ey
http://www.veryComputer.com/
ftp://invisible-island.net
Not to Sun marketing, as it seems. German ix magazine from Feb. 2005Quote:> I think it was pretty clear that ZFS would not make Solaris 10's initial
> release fairly long before S10 was released.
Nr. 6 on the list was "compatible to Linux for x86 platforms", which
I guess means Project Janus.
Overall, I guess marketing was talking about Solaris 10 as "Solaris
10 FCS plus all the updates there might be in the future". At that
time I often thought about how much discussion Microsoft would've
caused with such an announcement ..
mp.
--
Systems Administrator | Institute of Scientific Computing | Univ. of Vienna
(of course it's different for Solaris,Quote:> Overall, I guess marketing was talking about Solaris 10 as "Solaris
> 10 FCS plus all the updates there might be in the future". At that
> time I often thought about how much discussion Microsoft would've
> caused with such an announcement ..
--
Thomas E.*ey
http://www.veryComputer.com/
ftp://invisible-island.net
Casper
--
Expressed in this posting are my opinions. They are in no way related
to opinions held by my employer, Sun Microsystems.
Statements on Sun products included here are not gospel and may
be fiction rather than truth.
>>Overall, I guess marketing was talking about Solaris 10 as "Solaris
>>10 FCS plus all the updates there might be in the future". At that
>>time I often thought about how much discussion Microsoft would've
>>caused with such an announcement ..
> Our standard rule appaers to be something like "Solaris X + the first
> two updates".
> Casper
Pete.
I'll grant you that ZFS is late, but I'd rather it was delivered late but
correct than on time and riddled with bugs.
I've been using S10 for almost 2 years now, and I think it's a great
improvement over S9.
--
Rich Teer, SCNA, SCSA, OpenSolaris CAB member
President,
Rite Online Inc.
Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URL: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
--
Rich Teer, SCNA, SCSA, OpenSolaris CAB member
President,
Rite Online Inc.
Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URL: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
Casper
--
Expressed in this posting are my opinions. They are in no way related
to opinions held by my employer, Sun Microsystems.
Statements on Sun products included here are not gospel and may
be fiction rather than truth.
>> Sorry Dude, not a troll, long time Solaris user and fan just p'off with
>> the garbage being fed from the marketing machine on S10 and mad at
>> myself because I chomped on S10 when I knew better.
> So you think that DTrace, SMF, Zones, and all the other goodies new with
> S10 are just "a prototype of something yet to come"?
The info. tidbit was only to reassure those that it is coming, but
better late than never as this is a totally cool idea and this
innovation is worth the wait. Who else has even proposed such a
filesystem? Anyone?
I've seen a few third-party papers on ZFS implementation and use, albeit
beta ones, where the overall results have been *very* positive. Rather
than moan about ZFS being late, perhaps the nay sayers should find a
comparable file system even on paper (ZFS is *real* and being refined
*now*).
one year and counting...
http://www.veryComputer.com/
ZFS: the last word in file systems
;-)
--
Thomas E.*ey
http://www.veryComputer.com/
ftp://invisible-island.net
1. GETSERVBYNAME()????????????????????"""""""""""""
Hi,
Does anyone know why
struct servent *serv;
serv=getservbyname("exec","tcp");
gives a warning err of incomparible pointer type?
I also can't get rexec to function. It compiles ok....
Thanks
Kirk
3. """"""""My SoundBlast 16 pnp isn't up yet""""""""""""
4. redhat 7.3 resolv.conf overwritten every boot
5. truncated a file with "> file" but size comes back with "ls"
6. doesn linux support IOMEGA ZIP 100 ?
7. Type "(", ")" and "{", "}" in X...
8. Trident tgui9400CXi now supported by new X server, but has probs.
9. "umsdos" vs "vfat" vs "looped ext2"
10. "Novell-like","non-TCP/IP","networking" OS to place Unix
11. "netstat -nr" should show "default" or "0.0.0.0"?
12. "write" "to" "flon" commands
13. Problems with "df" and "du" on "/var"