DSL -> Blade 100 + Windows PC

DSL -> Blade 100 + Windows PC

Post by Ken » Wed, 27 Jun 2001 13:01:08



I have looked at Google and want to confirm the setup that it seems I
can use.  I have a Blade 100 and a PC running Win2k (usually - 3 other
OSs on there).  I want to network the two and have them share my
Mindspring DSL connection (pppoe), soon to be moved to my new apt.  Is
a Linksys 4-port Cable/DSL Router all I need to network the two,
provide the DSL connection to both, and even a firewall?  It sounds
almost too simple and too good to be true.  I get dynamic IP, btw.

Thanks.

-Ken

 
 
 

DSL -> Blade 100 + Windows PC

Post by Akop Pogosia » Wed, 27 Jun 2001 14:56:36



> I have looked at Google and want to confirm the setup that it seems I
> can use.  I have a Blade 100 and a PC running Win2k (usually - 3 other
> OSs on there).  I want to network the two and have them share my
> Mindspring DSL connection (pppoe), soon to be moved to my new apt.  Is
> a Linksys 4-port Cable/DSL Router all I need to network the two,
> provide the DSL connection to both, and even a firewall?  It sounds
> almost too simple and too good to be true.  I get dynamic IP, btw.

Yes, it is too good, and yes its is true. I use myself a four-port SMC
Barricade but I have also heard lots of good things about Linksys and
Netgear RT314 too. The SMC that I use also has a build-in (lpd
compatible) print server and support for ISDN/56k dial-up. All for
$100 or less. The only compliant that I have about it is that the TCP
session timeout is too short (about 30 minutes) which causes my idle
ssh sessions to close after about 30 minutes of inactivity, I was able
to fix that for my main PC by putting it in DMZ though.

Make sure you get a broadband gateway that doesn't require windows
specific tools to run (most of them just use http, telnet, ftp).
Alternatively, you can get a second network card for your Sun machine
and set it up as the router for your home network.

-akop

 
 
 

DSL -> Blade 100 + Windows PC

Post by Philippe Rousselo » Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:44:49


you can do the same with  asante router fr3004lc but for cable modem

> I have looked at Google and want to confirm the setup that it seems I
> can use.  I have a Blade 100 and a PC running Win2k (usually - 3 other
> OSs on there).  I want to network the two and have them share my
> Mindspring DSL connection (pppoe), soon to be moved to my new apt.  Is
> a Linksys 4-port Cable/DSL Router all I need to network the two,
> provide the DSL connection to both, and even a firewall?  It sounds
> almost too simple and too good to be true.  I get dynamic IP, btw.

> Thanks.

> -Ken

 
 
 

DSL -> Blade 100 + Windows PC

Post by Mathew Kirsc » Thu, 28 Jun 2001 04:04:20



> I have looked at Google and want to confirm the setup that it seems I
> can use.  I have a Blade 100 and a PC running Win2k (usually - 3 other
> OSs on there).  I want to network the two and have them share my
> Mindspring DSL connection (pppoe), soon to be moved to my new apt.  Is
> a Linksys 4-port Cable/DSL Router all I need to network the two,
> provide the DSL connection to both, and even a firewall?  It sounds
> almost too simple and too good to be true.  I get dynamic IP, btw.

Yes, that's all you need. With the broadband Internet systems and
multi-computer households, a market developed for these little network
"appliances" that do the network address translation (NAT) for you, allowing
you to have a local network using non-routeable IPs that share a single DSL or
Cable Modem connection.
 
 
 

DSL -> Blade 100 + Windows PC

Post by Ken » Thu, 28 Jun 2001 12:58:14


Thanks to Akop's recommendation I ended up going with the SMC
Barricade 4-port Broadband router.  I chose it over the Linksys mostly
because it supports external analog modem, so I can share the
connection now, until my DSL is hooked up again.  Haven't set up
Solaris for it yet, but I set it up so far on the Win2k PC and it was
awesome.  Took no time, via http.  Stil trying to decide whether to
stay with DHCP, as it is by default, or disable it and assign a
"static" IP to Solaris.

-Ken

 
 
 

DSL -> Blade 100 + Windows PC

Post by Akop Pogosia » Thu, 28 Jun 2001 17:51:46



> Thanks to Akop's recommendation I ended up going with the SMC
> Barricade 4-port Broadband router.  I chose it over the Linksys mostly
> because it supports external analog modem, so I can share the
> connection now, until my DSL is hooked up again.  Haven't set up
> Solaris for it yet, but I set it up so far on the Win2k PC and it was
> awesome.  Took no time, via http.  Stil trying to decide whether to
> stay with DHCP, as it is by default, or disable it and assign a
> "static" IP to Solaris.

Well, if you are planning on running ftp servers and such as you have
mentioned in your private email, then you have to use static IP
addresses for those. The gateway has to know what machine to forward
ports to and it has to be a static IP address. However, I'd still
leave the DHCP server on even if the machines on the LAN used static
IPs. The advantage to that, if your friend comes with a laptop and
wants to hook it up, it would be much easier with DHCP.

-akop

 
 
 

DSL -> Blade 100 + Windows PC

Post by James Richardso » Fri, 29 Jun 2001 20:49:01




> > I have looked at Google and want to confirm the setup that it seems I
> > can use.  I have a Blade 100 and a PC running Win2k (usually - 3 other
> > OSs on there).  I want to network the two and have them share my
> > Mindspring DSL connection (pppoe), soon to be moved to my new apt.  Is
> > a Linksys 4-port Cable/DSL Router all I need to network the two,
> > provide the DSL connection to both, and even a firewall?  It sounds
> > almost too simple and too good to be true.  I get dynamic IP, btw.

I have Earthlink DSL too, I use an old ultra 1 as a firewall, NAT, ( so it
has two ethernet cards in it, from ebay). I use the DSL 'modem' that
earthlink supplied, and pppoe from www.roaringpenguin.com. (which compiled
out-of-the-box) As NAT/fiewwall i use ipfilter, which seems to work great. I
run solaris 8 on the ultra 1, and have it running sendmail & bind, so mail
works from all the other machines on this side of the firewall. Its not
really a good idea to have these services on a firewall machine, but i dont
really have the luxury of having loads of spare machines...

If you want any configuration help, drop me a line.

Cheers

James

 
 
 

DSL -> Blade 100 + Windows PC

Post by James Richardso » Fri, 29 Jun 2001 20:50:17


Oops I forgot to say. Mindsping don't do static IP. (At least thats what
they tell me). They are considering it later this year for 'an additional
charge'. So no web servers.....
 
 
 

1. blade 100 -> blade 150 -> next?

Hello,
Have  10 X blade 100 with .5 GB RAM and 10 X with 2 GB RAM which are
used for training, for some big java based applications sometimes
including Oracle 9.
The blade 150s are faster than the 100s, but still a bit slow for some
of the bigger apps.
Mostly it seems to be the disk access, when installing for example,
that slows thing down.
probably the combination of ide disks and just one processor is not
quite up to the job in hand - those apps just keep getting bigger.
It does seem as though sol9 is just slightly slower than sol8 and we
will be moving to 10 soon.
Which might be slower/the same/faster.

So what hardware might be shortlisted to replace the blade 100s? Must
be sparc and should be faster than the balde 150s and - not tooo
expensive!

and suggestions?

ton

2. Which functions are better on Linux or PC?

3. will swap (new) Sun Blade 100 for best PC

4. Disk tuning tricks?

5. Getting a PC network adapter work in Blade 100 ?

6. "snappy" Sparc Classic minimum memory

7. Blade 100: DVD player for Blade + S8?

8. Help with Xlib / X Toolkit error ?

9. Boot Blade 1000 or Blade 100 into 32-bit mode OS

10. xmodmap on Blade 100, with PC keyboard: control/Caps swapping

11. will swap Sun Blade 100 for best PC

12. Export Cdrom on Sun Blade 100 or Sun Blade 150

13. Blade 100 & PC Monitors