by Jiri Dvor » Wed, 27 Jan 1993 17:48:18
The title says it all...
I'd like to install Solaris 2.1 on new HW we will get soon. However,
I need to have a Common Lisp running. Any suggestions? How about the
binary compatibility mode of Solaris? Will Lisp interpreters, e.g. Allegro
or Lucid, run under this mode?
Thanks,
1. GCL Common Lisp Version 1.0 and Red Hat Linux 2.1
Hi,
I have a problem with compiling GCL Common Lisp
Version 1.0 under Red Hat Commercial Linux 2.1.
When I attempt to load a compiled file, say foo.o,
I get the error:
Error: The string table of the file did not have any length.
Fast links are on: do ... etc etc.
The gcc compiler I am using is version 2.7.0.
I have figured out that the arguments I am passing
to the compiler when I invoke (compile-file "foo.lsp")
are:
gcc -f writable-string -DVol=volatile -I/root/gcl-1.0/o -O -c -I . NIL -W
if this means anything to anybody.
I have no problem compiling the foo.lsp file into the file foo.o, I
only get a problem when I try to load the compiled file.
Any help would be appreciated. I can be contacted by email,
see below.
Jon Spragg
*********************************************************
* Phone: 1-412-268-1376 The Robotics Institute *
* Intelligent Coordination *
* and Logistics Laboratory *
* DH3300 *
* Carnegie Mellon University *
* 5000 Forbes Avenue *
* Pittsburgh *
* Pennsylvania, 15213-3890 *
* USA *
*********************************************************
2. Net Apps Problem (deleting file)
3. Allegro/Franz Common LISP for Solaris 2.4
7. Solaris 2.1 printing sucks (was Re: problem with lpstat with Solaris 2.1)
8. Help with /etc/resolve.conf
11. Common LISP