>>Hey fellas I got an adaptec serial ata raid controller wich apparently isnt
>>supported by solaris.
>>Is there any way I can get it to work?
> Useit with FreeBSD :-)
> http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/hardware-i386.html#DISK
> //Lars
http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/usr/src/uts/intel/io/aac/aac.c
{0x9005, 0x285, 0x9005, 0x285, "Adatpec 2200S "},
203 {0x9005, 0x285, 0x9005, 0x286, "Adaptec 2120S "},
204 {0x9005, 0x285, 0x9005, 0x290, "Adaptec 2410SA "},
205 {0x9005, 0x285, 0x1028, 0x287, "Dell PERC 320/DC"},
206 {0x1028, 0xa, 0x1028, 0x121, "Dell PERC 3/Di"},
207 {0x1028, 0xa, 0x1028, 0x11b, "Dell PERC 3/Di"},
208 {0x1028, 0xa, 0x1028, 0x106, "Dell PERC 3/Di"},
209 {0x1028, 0x8, 0x1028, 0xcf, "Dell PERC 3/Di"},
210 {0x1028, 0x2, 0x1028, 0xd9, "Dell PERC 3/Di"},
211 {0x1028, 0x2, 0x1028, 0xd1, "Dell PERC 3/Di"},
212 {0x1028, 0x4, 0x1028, 0xd0, "Dell PERC 3/Si"},
213 {0x1028, 0x3, 0x1028, 0x3, "Dell PERC 3/Si"},
214 {0x1028, 0x2, 0x1028, 0x2, "Dell PERC 3/Di"},
215 {0x1028, 0x1, 0x1028, 0x1, "Dell PERC 3/Di"},
216 {0, 0, 0, 0, "AAC card "},
- Peter
--
--
Computer Systems Manager/BOFH Cell/GSM: +46 705 18 2786
Physics Department, Link?ping University Room: Building F, F203
it looks like some adaptec cards work in solaris-x86 and NOT in solaris
sparc. So before wasting your time with sata, be aware it works only on
solaris x86.
You can also find a good sata support summary here:
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/nachiketa/20050614#general_notes_on_...
and here:
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/mlf?entry=ata_on_solaris_x86_at
I hope that in the future sata will be supported on sparc :)
have fun!
Quote:> Hey fellas I got an adaptec serial ata raid controller wich apparently isnt
> supported by solaris.
> Is there any way I can get it to work?
It works quite well under Solaris, so it should also work on
OpenSolaris. The main issue I found (under Solaris 8) was that
compiling some X programs got a bit dicey with Imake.
It was a bit of a fight since Imake assumes Sun's C compiler, and so
you if you're using GCC you have to re-adjust things a bit to make
sure the correct compiler options are defined.
--
David Magda <dmagda at ee.ryerson.ca>
Because the innovator has for enemies all those who have done well under
the old conditions, and lukewarm defenders in those who may do well
under the new. -- Niccolo Machiavelli, _The Prince_, Chapter VI
>> A good suggestion. FreeBSD is a great OS. Now if only OpenSolaris
>> would have a ports system....
>Try NetBSD's pkgsrc.
>It works quite well under Solaris, so it should also work on
>OpenSolaris. The main issue I found (under Solaris 8) was that
>compiling some X programs got a bit dicey with Imake.
>It was a bit of a fight since Imake assumes Sun's C compiler, and so
>you if you're using GCC you have to re-adjust things a bit to make
>sure the correct compiler options are defined.
We are working on portage to OpenSolaris and it is more than
using NetBSD's software. Did you ever try it on OpenSolaris?
Making X compile on OpenSolaris is not trivial. We are working on
it and there are running X binaries on OpenSolaris since about 2 weeks.
If you are looking for a source package system for OpenSolaris (and other OS)
have a look at sps sps.berlios.de/pkg/
--
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
mkb.
>>We are working on portage to OpenSolaris and it is more than
>>using NetBSD's software. Did you ever try it on OpenSolaris?
>pkgsrc is not "NetBSD's software". It is portable across several
>systems, and while it's true that its initial (and still strongest)
>focus is NetBSD, it is very useful on the other supported systems
>aswell.
--
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
1. SATA RAID with HDs in separate box?
Hi,
I'd like to clarify for myself how one could setup a software (SATA) RAID-5
system where HDs are located in a separate box. Suppose I have 1 linux box
that's running a db server and db files are stored on RAID. I could put all HDs
used by RAID in this db server box, connect them to the HD controller and that's
it. However, I'd like to put all RAID HDs in a separate box.
One way I think it could be done if I setup the 2nd linux box (with motherboard,
HD controller, etc) just to run RAID. Then I would connect db server and RAID
server through LAN. The downside of this approach is a lot of overhead (extra
motherboard, RAM, linux setup, LAN overhead, etc).
The second approach I see is to have HD controller located in the db server box,
+ SATA, + long SATA data cables. The problem with this approach is that db
server and RAID server/box should be fairly close; the longest SATA cables I've
found were 3ft.
Any ideas? Thanks
P.S. I know there are ready commercial solutions for this but I'm still
interested in the "do-it-yourself" approach.
4. IDE hdd hotswappable and cable select
5. SATA RAID 1 - which controller to pick?
6. Mounting a UFS partition in Windows
7. Promise 378 SATA Raid controller stripe configuration MBFastTrack78
10. FastTrack 378 SATA RAID (A8V)
11. Mounting a SATA RAID setup
13. Has anyone installed Linux on a NetCell SyncRAID SR3100 SATA RAID array?