SATA raid

SATA raid

Post by Johnny » Tue, 12 Jul 2005 03:29:22



Hey fellas I got an adaptec serial ata raid controller wich apparently isnt
supported by solaris.
Is there any way I can get it to work?
 
 
 

SATA raid

Post by Richard B. Gilber » Tue, 12 Jul 2005 04:02:25



>Hey fellas I got an adaptec serial ata raid controller wich apparently isnt
>supported by solaris.
>Is there any way I can get it to work?

If you wrote your own driver for it, it might work! :-)

 
 
 

SATA raid

Post by Another To » Tue, 12 Jul 2005 05:20:29



> Hey fellas I got an adaptec serial ata raid controller wich apparently isnt
> supported by solaris.
> Is there any way I can get it to work?

Put it in a windows box.
 
 
 

SATA raid

Post by tunl » Tue, 12 Jul 2005 06:13:21



> Hey fellas I got an adaptec serial ata raid controller wich apparently isnt
> supported by solaris.
> Is there any way I can get it to work?

Useit with FreeBSD  :-)

http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/hardware-i386.html#DISK

//Lars

 
 
 

SATA raid

Post by KJ » Tue, 12 Jul 2005 08:12:51




>>Hey fellas I got an adaptec serial ata raid controller wich apparently isnt
>>supported by solaris.
>>Is there any way I can get it to work?

> Useit with FreeBSD  :-)

> http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/hardware-i386.html#DISK

> //Lars

A good suggestion.  FreeBSD is a great OS.  Now if only OpenSolaris
would have a ports system....
 
 
 

SATA raid

Post by Peter Eriksso » Tue, 12 Jul 2005 18:12:48



>Hey fellas I got an adaptec serial ata raid controller wich apparently isnt
>supported by solaris.
>Is there any way I can get it to work?

Which Adaptec SATA RAID would that be? Solaris 10 seems to atleast support
the Adaptec S2410SA SATA RAID controller.

http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/usr/src/uts/intel/io/aac/aac.c

{0x9005, 0x285, 0x9005, 0x285, "Adatpec 2200S   "},
    203         {0x9005, 0x285, 0x9005, 0x286, "Adaptec 2120S   "},
    204         {0x9005, 0x285, 0x9005, 0x290, "Adaptec 2410SA  "},
    205         {0x9005, 0x285, 0x1028, 0x287, "Dell PERC 320/DC"},
    206         {0x1028, 0xa, 0x1028, 0x121, "Dell PERC 3/Di"},
    207         {0x1028, 0xa, 0x1028, 0x11b, "Dell PERC 3/Di"},
    208         {0x1028, 0xa, 0x1028, 0x106, "Dell PERC 3/Di"},
    209         {0x1028, 0x8, 0x1028, 0xcf, "Dell PERC 3/Di"},
    210         {0x1028, 0x2, 0x1028, 0xd9, "Dell PERC 3/Di"},
    211         {0x1028, 0x2, 0x1028, 0xd1, "Dell PERC 3/Di"},
    212         {0x1028, 0x4, 0x1028, 0xd0, "Dell PERC 3/Si"},
    213         {0x1028, 0x3, 0x1028, 0x3, "Dell PERC 3/Si"},
    214         {0x1028, 0x2, 0x1028, 0x2, "Dell PERC 3/Di"},
    215         {0x1028, 0x1, 0x1028, 0x1, "Dell PERC 3/Di"},
    216         {0, 0, 0, 0, "AAC card      "},

- Peter
--
--

Computer Systems Manager/BOFH                Cell/GSM: +46 705 18 2786
Physics Department, Link?ping University     Room:     Building F, F203

 
 
 

SATA raid

Post by Paolo Di Francesc » Tue, 12 Jul 2005 22:19:06


Hi Johnny,

it looks like some adaptec cards work in solaris-x86 and NOT in solaris
sparc. So before wasting your time with sata, be aware it works only on
solaris x86.

You can also find a good sata support summary here:

http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/nachiketa/20050614#general_notes_on_...

and here:

http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/mlf?entry=ata_on_solaris_x86_at

I hope that in the future sata will be supported on sparc :)

have fun!

Quote:> Hey fellas I got an adaptec serial ata raid controller wich apparently isnt
> supported by solaris.
> Is there any way I can get it to work?

 
 
 

SATA raid

Post by David Magd » Wed, 13 Jul 2005 12:12:20



> A good suggestion.  FreeBSD is a great OS.  Now if only OpenSolaris
> would have a ports system....

Try NetBSD's pkgsrc.

It works quite well under Solaris, so it should also work on
OpenSolaris. The main issue I found (under Solaris 8) was that
compiling some X programs got a bit dicey with Imake.

It was a bit of a fight since Imake assumes Sun's C compiler, and so
you if you're using GCC you have to re-adjust things a bit to make
sure the correct compiler options are defined.

--
David Magda <dmagda at ee.ryerson.ca>
Because the innovator has for enemies all those who have done well under
the old conditions, and lukewarm defenders in those who may do well
under the new. -- Niccolo Machiavelli, _The Prince_, Chapter VI

 
 
 

SATA raid

Post by Joerg Schilli » Wed, 13 Jul 2005 19:24:29





>> A good suggestion.  FreeBSD is a great OS.  Now if only OpenSolaris
>> would have a ports system....

>Try NetBSD's pkgsrc.

>It works quite well under Solaris, so it should also work on
>OpenSolaris. The main issue I found (under Solaris 8) was that
>compiling some X programs got a bit dicey with Imake.

>It was a bit of a fight since Imake assumes Sun's C compiler, and so
>you if you're using GCC you have to re-adjust things a bit to make
>sure the correct compiler options are defined.

What you write is based on hope.....

We are working on portage to OpenSolaris and it is more than
using NetBSD's software. Did you ever try it on OpenSolaris?

Making X compile on OpenSolaris is not trivial. We are working on
it and there are running X binaries on OpenSolaris since about 2 weeks.

If you are looking for a source package system for OpenSolaris (and other OS)
have a look at sps sps.berlios.de/pkg/

--



URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily

 
 
 

SATA raid

Post by Matthias Buelo » Wed, 13 Jul 2005 19:32:37



>We are working on portage to OpenSolaris and it is more than
>using NetBSD's software. Did you ever try it on OpenSolaris?

pkgsrc is not "NetBSD's software". It is portable across several
systems, and while it's true that its initial (and still strongest)
focus is NetBSD, it is very useful on the other supported systems
aswell.

mkb.

 
 
 

SATA raid

Post by Joerg Schilli » Wed, 13 Jul 2005 19:42:02





>>We are working on portage to OpenSolaris and it is more than
>>using NetBSD's software. Did you ever try it on OpenSolaris?

>pkgsrc is not "NetBSD's software". It is portable across several
>systems, and while it's true that its initial (and still strongest)
>focus is NetBSD, it is very useful on the other supported systems
>aswell.

Did you try it on OpenSolaris?

--



URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily

 
 
 

1. SATA RAID with HDs in separate box?

Hi,

I'd like to clarify for myself how one could setup a software (SATA) RAID-5
system where HDs are located in a separate box. Suppose I have 1 linux box
that's running a db server and db files are stored on RAID. I could put all HDs
used by RAID in this db server box, connect them to the HD controller and that's
it. However, I'd like to put all RAID HDs in a separate box.

One way I think it could be done if I setup the 2nd linux box (with motherboard,
HD controller, etc) just to run RAID. Then I would connect db server and RAID
server through LAN. The downside of this approach is a lot of overhead (extra
motherboard, RAM, linux setup, LAN overhead, etc).

The second approach I see is to have HD controller located in the db server box,
+ SATA, + long SATA data cables. The problem with this approach is that db
server and RAID server/box should be fairly close; the longest SATA cables I've
found were 3ft.

Any ideas? Thanks

P.S. I know there are ready commercial solutions for this but I'm still
interested in the "do-it-yourself" approach.

2. Imake: gcc instead of cc

3. Debian+SATA+Raid 0

4. IDE hdd hotswappable and cable select

5. SATA RAID 1 - which controller to pick?

6. Mounting a UFS partition in Windows

7. Promise 378 SATA Raid controller stripe configuration MBFastTrack78

8. Unresolved symbol

9. ext sata raid for linux?

10. FastTrack 378 SATA RAID (A8V)

11. Mounting a SATA RAID setup

12. SATA RAID and Suze 9

13. Has anyone installed Linux on a NetCell SyncRAID SR3100 SATA RAID array?