by noon » Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:13:10
I have an installation of a Solaris9 release that is earlier than Solaris9
9/04. It is not even Solaris9 9/02, based on /etc/release.
My question is, isn't any release of Solaris9 really just Solaris9 plus
all the cluster patches ?
For example, docs.sun.com says that Solaris9 4/03 has "Multiterabyte
support for Solaris Volume Manager" as a new feature. Do I get this
feature by simply installing the latest cluster patches ?
by Matt » Mon, 21 Feb 2005 20:23:15
> I have an installation of a Solaris9 release that is earlier than Solaris9
> 9/04. It is not even Solaris9 9/02, based on /etc/release.
> My question is, isn't any release of Solaris9 really just Solaris9 plus
> all the cluster patches ?
> For example, docs.sun.com says that Solaris9 4/03 has "Multiterabyte
> support for Solaris Volume Manager" as a new feature. Do I get this
> feature by simply installing the latest cluster patches ?
Relating to Solaris 9, why not install Solaris 10? its a free download!
Matt
by Casper H.S. Di » Mon, 21 Feb 2005 20:58:20
Possibly.Quote:>For example, docs.sun.com says that Solaris9 4/03 has "Multiterabyte
>support for Solaris Volume Manager" as a new feature. Do I get this
>feature by simply installing the latest cluster patches ?
Casper
by noon » Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:31:45
>>For example, docs.sun.com says that Solaris9 4/03 has "Multiterabyte
>>support for Solaris Volume Manager" as a new feature. Do I get this
>>feature by simply installing the latest cluster patches ?
> Possibly.
> Casper
The main patch to achieve multiterabyte support is patch 114131-02. The
README then mentions other patches to achieve full multi-TB support.
by noon » Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:51:12
>>> For example, docs.sun.com says that Solaris9 4/03 has "Multiterabyte
>>> support for Solaris Volume Manager" as a new feature. Do I get this
>>> feature by simply installing the latest cluster patches ?
>> Possibly.
>> Casper
> Answering my own question.
> The main patch to achieve multiterabyte support is patch 114131-02. The
> README then mentions other patches to achieve full multi-TB support.
by Rich Tee » Wed, 23 Feb 2005 00:22:05
--
Rich Teer, SCNA, SCSA, author of "Solaris Systems Programming"
President,
Rite Online Inc.
Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URL: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
by noon » Wed, 23 Feb 2005 07:57:23
>>For example, docs.sun.com says that Solaris9 4/03 has "Multiterabyte
>>support for Solaris Volume Manager" as a new feature. Do I get this
>>feature by simply installing the latest cluster patches ?
> Not likely. As a rule, new features aren't added via patches, although
> there are some exceptions.
by noon » Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:15:59
> Relating to Solaris 9, why not install Solaris 10? its a free download!
> Matt
1. Solaris9 4/04: which USB hubs work?
Which USB hubs work on Solaris9? I couldn't find anything on USB hubs on
the HCL. I can only consider recommendations for USB hubs which you're
currently using under Solaris.
I have a D-Link DSB-H4 hub which is an "unrecognized" USB device under
Solaris, reported as "disconnected", so it doesn't work, nor are any devices
connected to it seen by the system.
3. Solaris9 Volume Manager Vs Veritas Volume Manager
4. US robotics model 0766 (winmodem) redhat 8.0 driver
5. Q: GNU binutils vs. Solaris9 binutils
6. Recording and playing sound on Creative SB64 PCI
7. Please help! L 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 10 10 10 10 04 10ILO
8. UNIX SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATION SKILLS NEEDED
10. solaris9 configure error with samba3
11. Solaris9: programmatic equivalent of modload possible?
13. Failed Solaris9 CD boot on Ultra 10: Fast Data Access MMU Miss