Installing sed3.0 and Solaris2.4 vs sed3.0 and Solaris2.5

Installing sed3.0 and Solaris2.4 vs sed3.0 and Solaris2.5

Post by Isabelle Moulinie » Sat, 03 Feb 1996 04:00:00



I try to install sed3.0 on Sparc1000-E server running Solaris2.4.

I have gcc-2.7.2 compiled under Solaris2.4
       make-3.74 compiled under Solaris2.4

When I run configure on a station running Solaris2.4, bcopy is not found and
an error during dynamic linking occurs: bzero symbol undefined.

When I run configure on a station running Solaris2.5, bcopy is found and I have
no problems compiling sed.

The variables PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH are identical in both cases.

Can someone help me solve this problem?

Thanks

Isabelle Moulinier
-------


 
 
 

Installing sed3.0 and Solaris2.4 vs sed3.0 and Solaris2.5

Post by Mike Batchel » Sat, 03 Feb 1996 04:00:00



Quote:>I try to install sed3.0 on Sparc1000-E server running Solaris2.4.
>I have gcc-2.7.2 compiled under Solaris2.4
>       make-3.74 compiled under Solaris2.4
>When I run configure on a station running Solaris2.4, bcopy is not found and
>an error during dynamic linking occurs: bzero symbol undefined.
>When I run configure on a station running Solaris2.5, bcopy is found and I have
>no problems compiling sed.
>The variables PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH are identical in both cases.
>Can someone help me solve this problem?

Don't use LD_LIBRARY_PATH, especially if it has /usr/ucblib in it.  GNU
Configure will figure out what you have, and what you don't have.  Solaris
2.4 has bcopy in the BSD compatibility libs, but Solaris 2.5 has
re-implemented it and placed it in the system's libc.
--

 "HTML is a terrible page layout language.  I suppose that's because it
 lacks any page layout commands."  -- me

 
 
 

Installing sed3.0 and Solaris2.4 vs sed3.0 and Solaris2.5

Post by Casper H.S. D » Sat, 03 Feb 1996 04:00:00



>I try to install sed3.0 on Sparc1000-E server running Solaris2.4.
>I have gcc-2.7.2 compiled under Solaris2.4
>       make-3.74 compiled under Solaris2.4
>When I run configure on a station running Solaris2.4, bcopy is not found and
>an error during dynamic linking occurs: bzero symbol undefined.

Seds config is busted then, or is it using a chaced 2.5 config?

2.4 doesn't have bzero in libc
compiler under 2.4 if you need to run under 2.4 & 2.5.

Quote:>When I run configure on a station running Solaris2.5, bcopy is found and I have
>no problems compiling sed.

This is normal as 2.5 adds a number of functions to libc.

Quote:>The variables PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH are identical in both cases.

LD_LIBRARY_PATH should be unset.

Casper
--
Casper Dik - Sun Microsystems - via my guest account at the University

Statements on Sun products included here are not gospel and may
be fiction rather than truth.