Openstep (was Re: Windows NT vs. Solaris)

Openstep (was Re: Windows NT vs. Solaris)

Post by Eric Danie » Thu, 05 Sep 1996 04:00:00




 SC> OpenStep for Solaris.  Just downloaded it myself - very clean, although
 SC> I'm having odd mouse behaviour - I think it's because a S2.5.1 patch
 SC> isn't out for OpenStep yet.  Otherwise, the best 100MB of hard drive
 SC> real-estate I've spent in a long time.

Then maybe you can tell me how to make the #%$!#* thing work. I installed it
on a SS4, but it keeps moaning about the resolution not being 72x72. The -dpi
option of Xsun seems to be silently ignored (it has no visible effect). On
what hardware did you try it?

Eric Daniel

 
 
 

Openstep (was Re: Windows NT vs. Solaris)

Post by ri.. » Thu, 05 Sep 1996 04:00:00




> : Then maybe you can tell me how to make the #%$!#* thing work. I installed it
> : on a SS4, but it keeps moaning about the resolution not being 72x72. The -dpi
> : option of Xsun seems to be silently ignored (it has no visible effect). On
> : what hardware did you try it?

> I got it to work by supplying
>    -fb /dev/fb dpix 72 dpiy 72
> instead of the -dpi option. I am not near my Sun right now so please
> check the Xsun man pages and make sure I have the options right.

> Rajeev

I use a startup script like this when I run OpenStep:

        ----------
        #!/bin/ksh
        #export XINITRC=$HOME/.xinitrc.o6p
        #export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/openstep/lib
        #export PATH=$PATH:/usr/openstep/bin

        openwin -dev /dev/fb0 dpix 72 dpiy 72 $* -wm oswm
        ----------

rick

--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

        "Earth?  I hear it's a great place to try on pants."

        Richard M. Goldstein

        Architecture, Technology & Tools Group
        SunSoft, Inc.

 
 
 

Openstep (was Re: Windows NT vs. Solaris)

Post by Stefanos Kiak » Thu, 05 Sep 1996 04:00:00


: Then maybe you can tell me how to make the #%$!#* thing work. I installed it
: on a SS4, but it keeps moaning about the resolution not being 72x72. The -dpi
: option of Xsun seems to be silently ignored (it has no visible effect). On
: what hardware did you try it?

: Eric Daniel

I got it running on a SPARCstation 4 running Solaris 2.5 with CDE. Just
download the CDE package from Sun's Web site. Almost as if you're running
NeXTSTEP.

stef

 
 
 

Openstep (was Re: Windows NT vs. Solaris)

Post by Michael L. Lewi » Fri, 06 Sep 1996 04:00:00


I installed OpenStep on my sparc10 with 128mb of RAM and I was not
impressed
at all even if it was free! It is painfully sloooow even in 8bit mode.
Using it remains of logging into my job on a 9600bps modem via PPP.

Also has anyone figured out how to add non OpenStep apps to the Dock.

====

 
 
 

Openstep (was Re: Windows NT vs. Solaris)

Post by Brad Lan » Sat, 07 Sep 1996 04:00:00



>Then maybe you can tell me how to make the #%$!#* thing work. I installed it
>on a SS4, but it keeps moaning about the resolution not being 72x72. The -dpi
>option of Xsun seems to be silently ignored (it has no visible effect). On
>what hardware did you try it?

    I was getting this response for a short while.  Exit CDE,
    Log in to the text console, kill off all of the CDE/openwin/Xsun/etc.
    stuff, restart the CDE login screen, and it works.  Or just reboot.

    Openstep runs on top of CDE also.  Its terminal program sucks up
    lots of CPU and memory.  You can't drag and drop between CDE and
    openstep.  Openstep doesn't save the position of the windows, and
    whether or not they're hidden or minimized.  There are some features
    of its user interface that I like, but there is little functionality
    that CDE doesn't supply in one form or another.

    When is someone going to come out w/a gui in which I can configure
    the type of scrollbar, where the scrollbar is positioned; same for
    title bar buttons.

    -- Brad

--
Until the next disk seek...

 
 
 

Openstep (was Re: Windows NT vs. Solaris)

Post by Michael Roussea » Sat, 07 Sep 1996 04:00:00


I, too use OpenStep on a Sparc 10 with only 32MB and CG6 (GX) graphics.  
It is really slow.  Before I burned out on the consulting industry, I had
a Sparc 20 mod 51 64/2GB with NeXTSTEP 3.3 which was absolutely the best
(though not most standard) platform I have ever worked on.  CDE runs well
 on a Sparc 10, but it is tru, OpenStep is a dog.

For those who loved NeXTSTEP, OpenStep is a fondly remembered friend.  
When I need speed and better color mapping, I still use CDE.  If speeds
were identical, and there were more OpenStep apps (like a version of
Solstice that works like NetInfo's apps), OpenStep would be my preferred
UI without hesitation.

Mike Rousseau
SysAdmin
City of Aspen


> I installed OpenStep on my sparc10 with 128mb of RAM and I was not
> impressed
> at all even if it was free! It is painfully sloooow even in 8bit mode.
> Using it remains of logging into my job on a 9600bps modem via PPP.

> Also has anyone figured out how to add non OpenStep apps to the Dock.

> ====


 
 
 

Openstep (was Re: Windows NT vs. Solaris)

Post by Timothy Re » Mon, 09 Sep 1996 04:00:00


If you're running CDE, copy /usr/dt/config/Xservers and Xconfig to
/etc/dt/config, and change the arguments to the Xsun server startup so
that the display starts up with the right resolution.  My 8 bit Sparc 5
has the following line:


Add that, restart X (I reboot cause I'm lazy, but restarting the X
server from the CDE login panel might work), and you should then be
able to start openstep from a command prompt.  I have found that after
a few days of running, that Openstep eventually exhausts VM and must be
restarted.

Tim


: : Then maybe you can tell me how to make the #%$!#* thing work. I installed it
: : on a SS4, but it keeps moaning about the resolution not being 72x72. The -dpi
: : option of Xsun seems to be silently ignored (it has no visible effect). On
: : what hardware did you try it?

: I got it to work by supplying
:    -fb /dev/fb dpix 72 dpiy 72

 
 
 

Openstep (was Re: Windows NT vs. Solaris)

Post by Timothy Re » Mon, 09 Sep 1996 04:00:00



: I installed OpenStep on my sparc10 with 128mb of RAM and I was not
: impressed
: at all even if it was free! It is painfully sloooow even in 8bit mode.

App startup is slower on Openstep, but once they're running apps -
Openstep and non-Openstep apps - run at a normal speed.  I haven't run
it on a Sparc 10, but I've been using it on a couple of 8 bit 64MB
Sparc 5s and, subjectively speaking of course, it's running as fast as
regular CDE does.  

The file viewer itself runs a little slower than the CDE one, and
definitely takes longer to start up, but that's because it's working
it's way through the apps in your openstep app path to find out which
apps can open which documents.  Remember that unlike X and Windows,
documents may be 'owned' by several Openstep applications (with one
primary) not just one.  Your call as to whether it's desirable to have
the desktop ignore /etc/magic.

: Also has anyone figured out how to add non OpenStep apps to the Dock.
This is easy - just drag the application icon from the Openstep file
viewer to the doc.  Don't do it from the CDE file viewer - that won't
work.  I've dropped a bunch of shell scripts and regular X
apps there and they all lock to the dock and do the right thing when
double-clicked.

Timothy Reed, Black Market Technologies, Inc.

"Written documentation is an admission of failure."

 
 
 

1. OpenStep for Solaris ( Re: Windows NT vs. Solaris )

Sun has released OpenStep for Solaris, it's available for free from their
Website. If they continue to release tools which use the OpenStep interface,
the best user interface on any system, they will be going in the right
direction. Only time will tell.

Check it out at,

   http://www.sun.com/solaris/products/openstep/

stef



: : On the other hand, I will be the first to acknowledge tha many Un*x
: : companies have repeatedly dropped the ball when it comes to marketing
: : their technologies, and this is something that Microsoft does supremely
: : well.

: It is not just at marketing that Sun has failed. It is also at improving
: the usability of their products. When it comes to keeping up with the
: times Sun has done amazingly poorly.

: Today even naive users expect to be able to administer powerful operating
: systems with ease. Windows NT has upped the ante. NT provides easy
: to use graphical user interfaces to do everything from configuring the
: network to installing new applications. Even kids can install, configure
: and use Windows NT. Sun just hasn't kept up. If you have a Solaris
: workstation on your desk you better have an experienced sysadmin person
: on hand to fix problems. Even many Sun engineers can't install and
: administer Solaris without help.

: This is a serious issue. Microsoft has won the war on the client side.
: Now they are fast capturing market on the server side. A lot of people
: who would otherwise have purchased Solaris boxes are now buying
: Windows NT instead. The reason is not that Windows NT is a better
: performing server operating system. The only reason apparently,
: is that NT is easier to administer!

: Now with the release of NT 4.0 (with sexy Win95 user interface) and also
: because memory prices have fallen steeply, NT market-share is going to
: grow even faster (to the detriment of the industry). I predict that
: unless Sun makes Solaris easy to administer (even for kids), Sun will not
: last another 5 years. Java technology can only take you so far.

: Rajeev

: Redwood City, CA

2. How do I recover from egcs v1.0.3a install?

3. File Server for Windows clients (was: Window NT vs x86 solaris vs SCO?)

4. Sending fd by IPC, how to?

5. Vision FS (was: Window NT vs x86 solaris vs SCO?)

6. How to get a job running again?

7. Window NT vs x86 solaris vs SCO?

8. SATAN installation

9. Linux V.S. Windows NT V.S. Windows 95