You can tune a file system, but you can't tune a fish

You can tune a file system, but you can't tune a fish

Post by Luis Fernand » Mon, 21 Aug 1995 04:00:00



The Solcrapis 2.4 units(1) man-page is "missing" the following
section, that is present in the SunOS 4.1 version:

        BUGS
             Do not base your financial plans on the currency conversions.

 
 
 

You can tune a file system, but you can't tune a fish

Post by Casper H.S. Dik - Network Security Engine » Tue, 22 Aug 1995 04:00:00


I always liked:

BUGS

        Behaves oddly on nights with full moon.

That's from the catman manual page, also censored in newer editions.

Casper
--
Expressed in this posting are my opinions.  They are in no way related
to opinions held by my employer, Sun Microsystems.

 
 
 

You can tune a file system, but you can't tune a fish

Post by Maurizio Codog » Tue, 22 Aug 1995 04:00:00




Quote:>I always liked:

>BUGS

>    Behaves oddly on nights with full moon.

>That's from the catman manual page, also censored in newer editions.

I understand that Sun decided to delete /usr/games because they thought it
does not give a "serious" image of Unix, and they wanted to reach the
business market. But deleting in-jokes in man pages... this seems to me a
little exaggerated.

.mau.

 
 
 

You can tune a file system, but you can't tune a fish

Post by Arthur D. Jeriji » Thu, 24 Aug 1995 04:00:00


        I found this interesting little blurb in the Linux
kernel:

/*
 *  'fork.c' contains the help-routines for the 'fork' system call
 * (see also system_call.s).
 * Fork is rather simple, once you get the hang of it, but the memory
 * management can be a *. See 'mm/mm.c': 'copy_page_tables()'
 */

...and this one...

/* vsprintf.c -- Lars Wirzenius & Linus Torvalds. */
/*
 * Wirzenius wrote this portably, Torvalds *ed it up :-)
 */

These have been around since Linux 0.01 and they still exist
in Linux 1.2.13.


 
 
 

You can tune a file system, but you can't tune a fish

Post by J. Porter Cla » Fri, 25 Aug 1995 04:00:00


My favorite, a heartfelt comment from the writer of
/usr/lib/lint/llib-lc on SunOS 4.X:

 /*
  * Damn RPC garbage.
  */

Also missing in Solaris 2, I think...

--

NASA/MSFC Flight Data Systems Branch

 
 
 

You can tune a file system, but you can't tune a fish

Post by J. Kan » Sat, 26 Aug 1995 04:00:00




|> >I always liked:
|> >
|> >BUGS
|> >
|> >      Behaves oddly on nights with full moon.
|> >
|> >
|> >That's from the catman manual page, also censored in newer editions.

|> I understand that Sun decided to delete /usr/games because they thought it
|> does not give a "serious" image of Unix, and they wanted to reach the
|> business market. But deleting in-jokes in man pages... this seems to me a
|> little exaggerated.

Do the make the /usr/games available at an ftp site?  And if not, why
not?
--

GABI Software, Sarl., 8 rue des Francs Bourgeois, 67000 Strasbourg, France
Conseils en informatique industrielle--
                             --Beratung in industrieller Datenverarbeitung

 
 
 

You can tune a file system, but you can't tune a fish

Post by Erez Lev » Tue, 29 Aug 1995 04:00:00





>>I always liked:

>>BUGS

>>        Behaves oddly on nights with full moon.

>>That's from the catman manual page, also censored in newer editions.

>I understand that Sun decided to delete /usr/games because they thought it
>does not give a "serious" image of Unix, and they wanted to reach the
>business market. But deleting in-jokes in man pages... this seems to me a
>little exaggerated.

        I thought the "moon thing" was in the ls man page.
        Anyway, they also used to have in one of the 1/4" tape man's
        something like:
        "Mathematicians have proven that there are 8 ways to insert the
        catridge into the slot, however only one of them is useful..."
Quote:

>.mau.

--
  Erez Levav            Fox Chase Cancer Center

  (215) 728-3160        Philadelphia, PA 19111
  ATT: 0-700-2xpress    0-700-2101010 (FAX)
 
 
 

You can tune a file system, but you can't tune a fish

Post by Greg Robins » Tue, 05 Sep 1995 04:00:00


This turned up in rec.humor.funny:

In the nroff source for tunefs(8), there is this part:

.\" Take this out and a Unix Demon will dog your steps from now until
.\" the time_t's wrap around.
.sp
You can tune a file system, but you can't tune a fish.

Which is a comment of course :-)

Greg.

--


 
 
 

You can tune a file system, but you can't tune a fish

Post by Bill Fenn » Sat, 09 Sep 1995 04:00:00


My favorite SunOS comment is deep in the bowels of /sys/os/subr_prf.c:

        /* THIS CODE IS VAX DEPENDENT IN HANDLING %l? AND %c */

Uh, uh-oh =)

Sun seems to be really, really good at changing code and neglecting the
comments, especially in the kernel.

  Bill

 
 
 

You can tune a file system, but you can't tune a fish

Post by Stefan Jon Silverma » Mon, 11 Sep 1995 04:00:00


Anybody remember the Steve Johnson (I worked for him at one point and always
liked the "yaccman" vanity license plate) comments in "pcc" (not the Oracle
thing, but the first "portable 'c' compiler") that said, to paraphrase,
"beyond this point dragons lurk" in  the parser where he attempted
to make the "great unwashed" understand that "magic happens" and if you modify
the code "bad things happen"......from my understanding of the story, this
happened around 4 A.M. when he got the code to work on something besides a
Honywell and went parading aroung the halls of Bell Labs saying "it works"
and never understood why...even 15 years later when we at nCube got the latest
SV5R4 code, the comments were still there and the code had not changed....

I also, failing memory becoming apparent, would love somebody to remind me
of the 2 line code example that proves a compiler is based on the original
K&R compiler (ala' an error messsage that says "illegal GECOS BCD constant"). I
knew it once and have lost it....

--

        Regards,

        b c++'ing u,

        %-) sjs

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stefan Jon Silverman - President                     SJS Associates, N.A., Inc.
                                                            572 Chestnut Street
Distributed Systems Architecture & Implementation      San Francisco, Ca. 94133
                                                            Phone: 415 989 2741
                                                            Fax:   415 989 7250

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Weebles wobble, but they don't fall down!!!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 
 
 

You can tune a file system, but you can't tune a fish

Post by Brad Hunttin » Wed, 13 Sep 1995 04:00:00



>In the nroff source for tunefs(8), there is this part:

>.\" Take this out and a Unix Demon will dog your steps from now until
>.\" the time_t's wrap around.
>.sp
>You can tune a file system, but you can't tune a fish.

Not suprisingly, AIX is one of the few BSD ports to remvove this quote...
Just goes ta' show ya,....  :)

brad

 
 
 

1. You can tune a file system, but you can't tune a fish

Here's the bug report that I filed about this back in 1993 (Sun bug 1152464).
(And I wasn't even the first Sun customer who complained about this.)

        The following four lines appear at the end of the file
        /usr/man/man8/tunefs.8 on Solaris 1.x machines, but they have
        been unaccountably removed from the file
        /usr/man/man1m/tunefs.1m on Solaris 2.x machines.

        .\" Take this out and a Unix Demon will dog your steps from now until
        .\" the time_t's wrap around.
        .sp
        You can tune a file system, but you can't tune a fish.

        Please bring these lines back.  Removing them has brought bad
        luck to us; our Solaris 2.x machines keep hanging and crashing.
        The time_t's don't wrap around until January 2038, and we can't
        wait that long.  Thanks.

I was told I'd see the `tune a fish' message back in the manual.
But did it reappear?  Nooooo.  And my Solaris 2.x hosts have been
hanging and crashing ever since.

It's enough to make one switch to BSD/OS, which still has the joke.

Don't laugh: the kind of humorless person who removes good-luck charms
from man pages is the kind of person who places higher priority on
bureaucratic correctness than on reliability, performance, and sound
engineering!

2. BBIIIIIIIIIIIIGGGGGG characters after starting STARTX

3. It's not bad canned meat...

4. Help, please: How to configure LILO for Linux on SCSI, Win95 on IDE.

5. Find repetitive patterns

6. Canned Proxy URLs to Filter

7. trouble with tape compression

8. CGI: apache canned response

9. For those of you tired of canned distributions...

10. Canned "ping"

11. Any Canned Class code?

12. PPPD or Tin Cans: Which is Better?