by Neil Ricke » Thu, 16 Jan 1997 04:00:00
I'm running solaris 2.5.1.
When I 'ftp' to the system with anonymous ftp, and use 'ls', it
prints uid and gid numbers, rather than user and group names.
This did not happen with solaris 2.3.
I have updated my installation (copying the new 'ls' to ~ftp/usr/bin,
the 2.5.1 libraries to ~ftp/usr/lib and recreating the devices in
~ftp/dev for which the major/minor numbers have changed.
Is anonymous ftp broken, or did I miss something?
by Neil Ricke » Fri, 17 Jan 1997 04:00:00
Try putting libmp.so.2 in ~ftp/usr/lib.
by Casper H.S. Dik - Network Security Engine » Fri, 17 Jan 1997 04:00:00
Casper
--
Expressed in this posting are my opinions. They are in no way related
to opinions held by my employer, Sun Microsystems.
Statements on Sun products included here are not gospel and may
be fiction rather than truth.
by Bob Starki » Sat, 18 Jan 1997 04:00:00
If I remember correctly you need to have passwd and group files inQuote:>I'm running solaris 2.5.1.
>When I 'ftp' to the system with anonymous ftp, and use 'ls', it
>prints uid and gid numbers, rather than user and group names.
by Dave Sander » Sat, 18 Jan 1997 04:00:00
Just a wild guess here,
you put ls in ftp's /usr/bin and did the mknod on the two dev files, did
you make a link to ~ftp/usr/bin?
good luck
dave sanders
saic
Quote:> I'm running solaris 2.5.1.
> When I 'ftp' to the system with anonymous ftp, and use 'ls', it
> prints uid and gid numbers, rather than user and group names.
> This did not happen with solaris 2.3.
> I have updated my installation (copying the new 'ls' to ~ftp/usr/bin,
> the 2.5.1 libraries to ~ftp/usr/lib and recreating the devices in
> ~ftp/dev for which the major/minor numbers have changed.
> Is anonymous ftp broken, or did I miss something?
by Robert Borochof » Tue, 21 Jan 1997 04:00:00
> I'm running solaris 2.5.1.
> When I 'ftp' to the system with anonymous ftp, and use 'ls', it
> prints uid and gid numbers, rather than user and group names.
> This did not happen with solaris 2.3.
> I have updated my installation (copying the new 'ls' to ~ftp/usr/bin,
> the 2.5.1 libraries to ~ftp/usr/lib and recreating the devices in
> ~ftp/dev for which the major/minor numbers have changed.
> Is anonymous ftp broken, or did I miss something?
robert borochoff
by Neil Ricke » Tue, 21 Jan 1997 04:00:00
1. Is 'ls' broken with anonymous ftp in 2.5.
You missed something. Anonymous ftp protects your system by executing
the chroot command to isolate ftp users from such directories as /etc.
If you want user and group ID's to be translated, you must include an
etc directory in your ftp root that contains the files passwd and group.
2. Help. Need some X-Window Apps
3. anonymous ftp won't 'ls' in Solaris 2.6
4. Named 8.2.2-P5 and solaris2.6 on Netra i.
5. 'ls' fails in anonymous FTP session
7. how to get ftpd 'ls' to work with anonymous ftp
9. wu-ftp server problem, unable to use 'ls' or 'dir'
10. Anonymous FTP, ls don't work!
11. ls don't work with anonymous ftp.
12. ?? ftp 'ls'-command with 'pg' ??
13. anonymous ftp, can't see ls -l