Very Computer

I need to know where I can get a compiler for Solaris 10. Is there
anyone out there that can help me?

JF
St. Louis, MO

JF
St. Loius, MO

Markus

Dennis Clarke

After further thought I can let you know that I have already ran into problems
with GCC 3.3.2 on Solaris 10 Sparc due to a dependency on the SUNWcslx
package.  The Solaris 10 install only has SUNWcsl as the x is redundant on
Solaris 10.

Sun Microsystems Inc.   SunOS 5.10      s10_51  May 2004
$ pkginfo | grep SUNWcsl
system      SUNWcsl                          Core Solaris, (Shared Libs)
system      SUNWcslr                         Core Solaris Libraries (Root)

Sun Microsystems Inc.   SunOS 5.9       Generic May 2002
$ pkginfo | grep SUNWcsl
system      SUNWcsl                          Core Solaris, (Shared Libs)
system      SUNWcslx                         Core Solaris Libraries (64-bit)

I was able to install GCC 2.95 from blastwave.org and then bootstrap
 GCC 3.3.2 with success.  Sorry .. no package from blastwave.org yet!

I also have the Studio 9 EA packages but have not yet had time to use them
much.  I am sure that they would work well provided that you have the disk
space and RAM.  No promises though :)

Dennis Clarke               Director and Admin for Blastwave.org
                               Home of Community Software Packages

--
Med vennlig hilsen / Best regards
Christer Solskogen / dizzy tun3Z
http://dtz.cjb.net - http://carebears.mine.nu

"Cheap, but not as cheap as your girlfriend!"
-Spider Jerusalem

Markus

Parse errors in a header file generally indicate some problem with the
source, usually an option that the source used that is not available in
the compiler as such, or maybe the headers that come as part of
sol 10 have or don't have a feature that apache wants.

If you posted a _SHORT_ example, maybe somebody could guess
at what the problem is.  (I suggest 10 lines or less).

Speaking only for myself,

Joe Durusau

Quote:>Just a quick one;
>Can you build gcc-3.3.2 with gcc-3.3.2 (built by gcc-2.95) ?

long answer : the stage 3 phase of the bootstrap does this.  That is why
              gcc -v reports that it is built with itself.

longer answer :

  I am in the process of doing this ( again ) as I would like a better test
 result from the testsuite. I'll let people know when it seems to be working.

Dennis

This is almost certainly a side-effect of gcc's fixincludes madness --
it squirrels away slightly modified copied of a bunch of system
headers.  In particular, you are probably getting errors relating to
pthread_spinlock_t or pthread_barrier_t, which were recently added to
<sys/types.h> in S10.

fixincludes *always* mucks with <sys/types.h>, so you are probably
getting the S9 version of the header. (or whatever version the GCC
package you are using picked up)

Unfortunately, I have no idea how to update the headers without
re-doing the entire gcc installation.  Any GCC gurus in the house?

- jonathan

"you might have to rebuild gcc or rerun fixincludes. It has a munged copy of
sys/types.h and that needs to be updated to work with the system headers
it didn't munge :)"

So I rerun fixincludes and everything worked fine afterwards. I don't know
if I had to get fixincludes from the source distribution of gcc though.

HTH, Dragan

--
Dragan Cvetkovic,

To be or not to be is true. G. Boole      No it isn't.  L. E. J. Brouwer

!!! Sender/From address is bogus. Use reply-to one !!!

--
Rich Teer, SCNA, SCSA

President,
Rite Online Inc.

Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URL: http://www.rite-online.net

For example, the difference between fixed sys/types.h back in s10_b48 and a
new one (in s10_b51) is that the new one contains definition of
pthread_barrier_t (sounds interesting!) and related stuff. My problem in
compiling gdb back in s10_b48 was that gcc specific <sys/types.h> didn't
contain upad128_t (after running fixincl it did compile).

On the other hand, I don't remember having many problems with gcc fixed
Solaris 9 headers until s10_b48.

Now, why does gcc need to do this is another question. I guess it is not
easy to fit all these different UNIX and non-UNIX platforms into a single
compile framework...

Bye, Dragan

--
Dragan Cvetkovic,

To be or not to be is true. G. Boole      No it isn't.  L. E. J. Brouwer

!!! Sender/From address is bogus. Use reply-to one !!!

Oh, how uncomplicated life is in my insular, SPARC/Solaris/Sun
compiler world!  :-)

--
Rich Teer, SCNA, SCSA

President,
Rite Online Inc.

Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URL: http://www.rite-online.net

http://www.sunfreeware.com/gcc.html

follow the instructions and gcc compiles perfectly.

Quote:> I'm trying to compile apache on Solaris 10 and been unable to do so --
> I keep getting Pthread.h parse errors during make. Since i'm using the
> SunFreeware Solaris 9 gcc 3.3.2 package on it, I think the problem is
> that compiler is linked against Solaris 9 specific libraries, headers,
> etc and won't work on Solaris 10. I tried compiling gcc 3.3.3 on it
> using this compiler (my only option) which of course failed.

> I need to know where I can get a compiler for Solaris 10. Is there
> anyone out there that can help me?

> JF
> St. Louis, MO