> >I've read through every FAQ I can find, every man page that seems like it
> >might be applicable, and tried everything I can think of based on my
Linux
> >experience, but I still can't find a way to make the 'Delete' key on my
> >Ultra 5 delete forward instead of duplicating the effects of 'Backspace'
and
> >'Ctrl-h'. I'm beginning to wonder if this is even possible, though surely
it
> >must be?
> Well, here are some thoughts that might get you closer to your goal:
> - /usr/openwin/demo/xev will show you what's happening in terms of
> keysyms and keycodes when you hit that key. You should be getting
> a Delete keysym. If you are, then the X server itself is
> configured O.K. -- it's a matter of applications that use the
> server properly interpreting that keysym.
> - All the xmodmap-ing in the world won't change a thing if your
> shell treats a delete (ascii 127, a/k/a ^?) the same as a backspace
> (ascii 8, a/k/a ^H).
> - Your shell doesn't see keysyms at all. It runs under a terminal,
> so it just sees tty input which means control characters. xterm
> (or whatever terminal emulator you use -- maybe dtterm instead)
> chooses how it's going to translate that keysym into some input for
> the tty.
> - You also didn't mention which shell you're using. If you're using
> ksh, you probably need to rebind an input sequence to a command
> history editing function.
I'm using bash, and bind did the trick for that, at least. I'd been hoping
for a more general solution, but I suppose there isn't or there would've
been an answer in one of the FAQs. Now I'm looking for a text editor that
will work or allow itself to be configured so the d*** Delete key works the
way I've become accustomed to it working over the last 15 years...
Quote:> - There's even a level of translation between the shell and the
> xterm -- the tty's input processing. You might need to use
> "stty -a" to see whether the input that your terminal emulator
> generates when you hit that delete key is set up as one of the
> keys that are specially processed by the tty.
Was the object in designing things this way just an attempt to see how many
layers of complexity someone could add to a simple job? I suppose things
just evolved and layers got added, but this reminds me of the way some USAF
comm systems I worked on were designed (apparently with an eye towards
maximum contractor work (and profit) and bloated military organizational
empires).
Quote:> Hope that helps.
It did. Thank you!
Larry