netatalk & Solaris 2.6

netatalk & Solaris 2.6

Post by Sebastian-Johannes Beno » Thu, 19 Mar 1998 04:00:00



Has anyone got netatalk running under Solaris 2.6 ?
A few compiler error I could fix myself, however compile
wuits with

gcc -p -D__svr4__ -DSOLARIS -I/usr/include -O -I../../include -c nbp_util.c
 nbp_util.c: In function  bp_parse':
 nbp_util.c:62: structure has no member named  S_un'

Benno

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Modern computers have advanced to the point where they are extremely
intuitive, though obviously you have to spend a lot of time learning
how to use them first.

- Sebastian Benoit

- http://www.mathematik.uni-marburg.de/~benoit

 
 
 

netatalk & Solaris 2.6

Post by Casper H.S. Dik - Network Security Engine » Fri, 20 Mar 1998 04:00:00


[[ PLEASE DON'T SEND ME EMAIL COPIES OF POSTINGS ]]


>Has anyone got netatalk running under Solaris 2.6 ?
>A few compiler error I could fix myself, however compile
>wuits with
>gcc -p -D__svr4__ -DSOLARIS -I/usr/include -O -I../../include -c nbp_util.c
> nbp_util.c: In function  bp_parse':
> nbp_util.c:62: structure has no member named  S_un'

It's not wise to use -I/usr/include with gcc.

Casper
--
Expressed in this posting are my opinions.  They are in no way related
to opinions held by my employer, Sun Microsystems.
Statements on Sun products included here are not gospel and may
be fiction rather than truth.

 
 
 

netatalk & Solaris 2.6

Post by Sebastian-Johannes Beno » Sat, 21 Mar 1998 04:00:00



: [[ PLEASE DON'T SEND ME EMAIL COPIES OF POSTINGS ]]
:

:
: >Has anyone got netatalk running under Solaris 2.6 ?
: >A few compiler error I could fix myself, however compile
: >wuits with
:
: >gcc -p -D__svr4__ -DSOLARIS -I/usr/include -O -I../../include -c nbp_util.c
: > nbp_util.c: In function  bp_parse':
: > nbp_util.c:62: structure has no member named  S_un'
:
:
: It's not wise to use -I/usr/include with gcc.

I put that in to get around another error, where gcc included
.../gcc/include/.../byteorder.h instead of /usr/include/sys/byteorder.h

Thanks :-)
Benno

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Modern computers have advanced to the point where they are extremely
intuitive, though obviously you have to spend a lot of time learning
how to use them first.

- Sebastian Benoit

- http://www.mathematik.uni-marburg.de/~benoit

 
 
 

netatalk & Solaris 2.6

Post by William LeFebv » Sun, 22 Mar 1998 04:00:00




>I put that in to get around another error, where gcc included
>.../gcc/include/.../byteorder.h instead of /usr/include/sys/byteorder.h

Did you rerun the script "fixinc.svr4" in the gcc distribution after
you upgraded to 2.6?  This rebuilds the include files for gcc from the
ones in /usr/include and needs to be done after any sort of system
upgrade.

--
                                William LeFebvre
                                Group sys Consulting

                                +1 770 813 3224

 
 
 

1. 2.5.1 -> 2.6 & DiskSuite [Was: Solaris 2.6 & Solstice DiskSuite 4.0]

Could someone please clarify this.  I have a UE2 running 2.5.1 and wish
to upgrade the machine to 2.6 by wiping the interal drives and doing
a fresh install of 2.6.  The machine has 8 external drives that are
configured as pieces of several RAID 0 meta-devices.  I would like to
avoid having to backup and reconfigure these meta-devices.  Is this
possible?  How do I go about upgrading disksuite before hand, and what
does this accomplish?  Thanks for your help.

Chris.

2. apache,cookie and denying access to those whithout the cookie set

3. Netatalk & Foxpro 2.6 file not found

4. TEST - IGNORE PLEASE

5. Netatalk on Sparc Solaris 2.6

6. Job responsibility between UNIX System Admin and Operator???

7. Netatalk Problem with Solaris 2.6

8. Detach the daemon in Korn

9. solaris 2.6 && dbx panic

10. Solaris 2.6 & gcc & gated

11. SS20 & HP-6MP & Solaris 2.6(7) config

12. can't read Solaris 2.6 x86 hard disk on Solaris 2.6 Ultra-1 ?!?

13. Solaris 2.6 Apache & Jserv & mod_rewrite question