gcc Solaris 2.1 x86 (FCS) (2.4.3)

gcc Solaris 2.1 x86 (FCS) (2.4.3)

Post by Doug Ans » Thu, 17 Jun 1993 00:30:33



Hi:

I'm trying to get gcc  2.4.3 to build on my 486/33 running the FCS Solaris 2.1 x86.
The configure utility does have a case statement for compiling gcc for this platform
(I'm using: ./configure i486-unknown-solaris2).

However, the first make (make LANGUAGES=c) is failing on insn-recog.c --
the assembler is * terribly. I've viewed the *.s file created and there are alot of
"#" signs within the code that I believe are the root of the problem.

Does anyone know how to get around this?  Has anyone successfully gotten gcc to run
on this platform?

Thanks for any pointers/comments you can think of..

Doug
--
-------------------------------------------
Doug Anson                                      

Phone:    713.560.1274
FAX:      713.560.1277
SNAIL:    Landmark Graphics Corporation LGC    
          15150 Memorial Drive
          Houston, TX 77079                    
-------------------------------------------

 
 
 

gcc Solaris 2.1 x86 (FCS) (2.4.3)

Post by Ed Whittemo » Wed, 23 Jun 1993 09:23:09



>Hi:

>I'm trying to get gcc  2.4.3 to build on my 486/33 running the FCS Solaris 2.1 x86.
>The configure utility does have a case statement for compiling gcc for this platform
>(I'm using: ./configure i486-unknown-solaris2).

>However, the first make (make LANGUAGES=c) is failing on insn-recog.c --
>the assembler is * terribly. I've viewed the *.s file created and there are alot of
>"#" signs within the code that I believe are the root of the problem.

>Does anyone know how to get around this?  Has anyone successfully gotten gcc to run
>on this platform?

>Thanks for any pointers/comments you can think of..

How do you compile the compiler without a cc to make gcc?

--

American Micro Group, Inc. Phone 201-944-3293 Fax 201-944-3902

 
 
 

gcc Solaris 2.1 x86 (FCS) (2.4.3)

Post by kenneth.r.hathaw » Fri, 25 Jun 1993 11:20:24


Quote:Doug Anson writes:
>Hi:

>I'm trying to get gcc  2.4.3 to build on my 486/33 running the FCS Solaris 2.1
x86.
>The configure utility does have a case statement for compiling gcc for this pla
tform
>(I'm using: ./configure i486-unknown-solaris2).

>However, the first make (make LANGUAGES=c) is failing on insn-recog.c --
>the assembler is * terribly. I've viewed the *.s file created and there a
re alot of
>"#" signs within the code that I believe are the root of the problem.

>Does anyone know how to get around this?  Has anyone successfully gotten gcc to
 run
>on this platform?

>Thanks for any pointers/comments you can think of..

I get the same thing with gcc 2.4.5. Any help out there??

Thanks tunes

#############################################################################

 
 
 

gcc Solaris 2.1 x86 (FCS) (2.4.3)

Post by Doug Ans » Sat, 26 Jun 1993 02:54:12



|> >Hi:
|> >
|> >I'm trying to get gcc  2.4.3 to build on my 486/33 running the FCS Solaris 2.1 x86.
|> >The configure utility does have a case statement for compiling gcc for this platform
|> >(I'm using: ./configure i486-unknown-solaris2).
|> >
|> >However, the first make (make LANGUAGES=c) is failing on insn-recog.c --
|> >the assembler is * terribly. I've viewed the *.s file created and there are alot of
|> >"#" signs within the code that I believe are the root of the problem.
|> >
|> >Does anyone know how to get around this?  Has anyone successfully gotten gcc to run
|> >on this platform?
|> >
|> >Thanks for any pointers/comments you can think of..
|> >
|>
|> How do you compile the compiler without a cc to make gcc?
|>
|> --

|> American Micro Group, Inc. Phone 201-944-3293 Fax 201-944-3902

I have a compiler -- the OEM release of ProWorks..

BTW, has anyone tried gcc 2.4.5?

Doug
--
-------------------------------------------
Doug Anson                                      

Phone:    713.560.1274
FAX:      713.560.1277
SNAIL:    Landmark Graphics Corporation LGC    
          15150 Memorial Drive
          Houston, TX 77079                    
-------------------------------------------

 
 
 

gcc Solaris 2.1 x86 (FCS) (2.4.3)

Post by Ronald F. Guilmet » Sat, 26 Jun 1993 08:16:56



>Doug Anson writes:

>>Hi:

>>I'm trying to get gcc  2.4.3 to build on my 486/33 running the FCS Solaris 2.1
>x86.
>>The configure utility does have a case statement for compiling gcc for this pla
>tform
>>(I'm using: ./configure i486-unknown-solaris2).

>>However, the first make (make LANGUAGES=c) is failing on insn-recog.c --
>>the assembler is * terribly. I've viewed the *.s file created and there a
>re alot of
>>"#" signs within the code that I believe are the root of the problem.

>>Does anyone know how to get around this?  Has anyone successfully gotten gcc to
> run
>>on this platform?

>>Thanks for any pointers/comments you can think of..

>I get the same thing with gcc 2.4.5. Any help out there??

I don't know if anyone has ever successfully built GCC on Solaris 2.x for x86.
It is possible that this has never been done before.

If you want to give me an account on your system (setup so that I can telnet
to it from the internet) then I would be willing to try to do the build...
but be warned!  My other projects have to take precedence over this... in
fact, I may *never* actually get time to try to do the build.

--

-- Ronald F. Guilmette ------------------------------------------------------

------ uucp address: ...!uunet!netcom.com!rfg -------------------------------

 
 
 

gcc Solaris 2.1 x86 (FCS) (2.4.3)

Post by Scott Walla » Sat, 26 Jun 1993 22:56:52


.
.
.

|> >Hi:
|> >
|> >I'm trying to get gcc  2.4.3 to build on my 486/33 running the FCS Solaris 2.1 x86.
|> >The configure utility does have a case statement for compiling gcc for this platform
|> >(I'm using: ./configure i486-unknown-solaris2).
|> >
|> >However, the first make (make LANGUAGES=c) is failing on insn-recog.c --
|> >the assembler is * terribly. I've viewed the *.s file created and there are alot of
|> >"#" signs within the code that I believe are the root of the problem.

Quote:> BTW, has anyone tried gcc 2.4.5?

Yes,

I'm also running Solaris 2.1 FCS with the FCS ProWorks Compilers, and tried
2.4.5 the other day.  I get the same problem with the insn-recog.c that
everyone else has reported.

   I generated the assembly code, but it's double-dutch to me.  Maybe someone
will be able to spot the problem. ( An extract appears below..).

   Maybe someone has a contact at sun who know's what they're doing?  The
ProWorks compilers are unusable(presently) for anything serious (ie Longjmp's
out of signal handlers don't work).

Cheers
Scott.

Scott Wallace

Z/Max Computer Solutions Inc.
Baldwinsville, NY

Extract from assembly generated by ProWorks Procompiler on the insn-recog.c
file from gcc 2.4.5
.
.
.
.
/====================
/ recog_1
/--------------------
        .align  4
        .align  4
        .globl  recog_1
recog_1:
        pushl   %ebp
        movl    %esp,%ebp
        subl    $20,%esp
        .stabn  0xc0,0,1,.-recog_1   /<------ Barks here (Illegal subtraction)
        .stabs  "x0:p(10,10)",0xa0,0,0,8
        .stabs  "insn:p(10,10)",0xa0,0,0,12
        .stabs  "pnum_clobbers:p(0,20)",0xa0,0,0,16
        .stabs  "ro:(0,21)=*(10,4)",0x80,0,0,-4
        .stabs  "x1:(10,10)",0x80,0,0,-8
        .stabs  "x2:(10,10)",0x80,0,0,-16
        .stabs  "x3:(10,10)",0x80,0,0,-20
        .stabs  "x4:(10,10)",0x80,0,0,-24
        .stabs  "x5:(10,10)",0x80,0,0,-28
        .stabs  "x6:(10,10)",0x80,0,0,-32
.
.
.
.

 
 
 

gcc Solaris 2.1 x86 (FCS) (2.4.3)

Post by Richard M. Mathe » Sat, 10 Jul 1993 02:29:54



Quote:>I don't know if anyone has ever successfully built GCC on Solaris 2.x for x86.
>It is possible that this has never been done before.

It has been done.  We have gcc 2.2.2 in our /usr/local/bin here.
Unfortunately, I don't know who here built it, so I can't provide
any tips.

     Richard M. Mathews                 F oster
                                         E stonian-Latvian-Lithuanian

                                           F reedom!

 
 
 

1. NFS problems with Solaris 2.1 (FCS) x86

Has anyone had problems using Solaris 2.1 to copy files across an an NFS mount
point?

My analysis has shown that 8k blocks are apparently being replaced at random. I
want to check both software and hardware since my machine is the first Solaris
2.1 on our network and I am unfamiliar with how cp is implemented.

Thanks in advance,
Carlos

--
!----------------------------------------------!
!Carlos V. Rozas     | MS CO4-02               !

!(503) 629-7743      | Hillsboro, OR 97124-6497!
!----------------------------------------------!

2. mandb colorizied output

3. stat.h screwy in gcc-2.5.0 on Solaris x86 2.1

4. /dev/fd0 Gone...what now?

5. Gcc 2.3.3 for Solaris 2.1 x86.

6. 5.5 app can't open connection to X server when running in 5.6

7. Testing GCC 2.4.5 under Solaris 2.1 for x86

8. need help in configuring filesystem cache

9. SUMMARY: GCC binaries for Solaris 2.1 x86

10. Gcc 2.5.8 & Solaris 2.1 x86

11. Building gcc 2.5.5 on Solaris X86 2.1

12. XFree86 2.1 for solaris x86 2.1

13. V: Solaris 2.1 FCS fuer Intel