Hi
Could anyone please suggest as to what Sun Sparc systems would suit best for
a 400 GIG Oracle Database for a 24X7 operations - including backup media
hardware
Tks so much
Mike
Could anyone please suggest as to what Sun Sparc systems would suit best for
a 400 GIG Oracle Database for a 24X7 operations - including backup media
hardware
Tks so much
Mike
> Hi
> Could anyone please suggest as to what Sun Sparc systems would suit best for
> a 400 GIG Oracle Database for a 24X7 operations - including backup media
> hardware
> Tks so much
> Mike
Several A5200 StorEdge Disk Arrays or 1 A7000 (4.2 TB capacity)
Plan on doing 1 + 0 hardware RAID (mirror: hardware, stripe: Veritas)
Plan on a huge archive directory so you can do hot backups or
go with triple mirror. The performace hit of resyncing mirrors can be
worse or just as bad as a hot backup.
L11000 StorEdge Tape Library attached to backup domain (8 tape drives).
Create a virtual network interface between backup domain and database
domain.
Go with the A7000 if you see lots of growth in your future. Otherwise a
few
of the A5200 racks (1 TB) should do.
Norm.
P.S. Please ask your Sun rep to send me a 5% referal fee so I can
retire.
The a5000 does not have the throughput that I think you are looking for.Quote:>>Several A5200 StorEdge Disk Arrays or 1 A7000 (4.2 TB capacity)
-mike
Quote:> Hi
> Could anyone please suggest as to what Sun Sparc systems would suit best
for
> a 400 GIG Oracle Database for a 24X7 operations - including backup media
> hardware
> Tks so much
> Mike
> >>Several A5200 StorEdge Disk Arrays or 1 A7000 (4.2 TB capacity)
> The a5000 does not have the throughput that I think you are looking
The A5000 has blazing fast I/O, but no write buffer cache, so I/O in a
read/write intensive environment,performance can really suffer.
(Actually, it DOES have an optional set of NVRAM cache cards that list
for $15k. Ugh.)
A7000 was mostly for shared E10k/mainframe storage. It wasn't designedQuote:> The a7000 is even worse, and sun has already end of lifed it, so you
> wouldn't be able to buy it anyway.
The best choice for storage would be the
I agree, the A3500 would probably be ideal. Huge cache, HW RAID, etc.Quote:> a3500 fc-al arrays. In the benchmarks I have done they are about 3
times as
> fast as the a5000's.
The e10k I think would be ideal however.
Depends. Are you doing Oracle Parallel Server? Oracle HA? Have you
figured what your CPU and memory requirements will be?
- rx
> -mike
> > Hi
> > Could anyone please suggest as to what Sun Sparc systems would suit
best
> for
> > a 400 GIG Oracle Database for a 24X7 operations - including backup
media
> > hardware
> > Tks so much
> > Mike
1. 400 meg, 500 meg, & 1 gig Hard Disks
I am getting ready to purchase a hard disk in the size range
above, for use as the primary disk for linux. I have
noticed a few threads about problems with these larger
disks. Can anyone recap this information, and/or provide
me with the information about which size/brands to stay
away from and why to stay away from them?
Thanks
2. First boot sector doesn't have a valid LILO signature
3. Solaris/Oracle more than 400 users ?
4. ANNOUNCE: X-ISP v1.5: X11 visual I/F to pppd/chat: BUG-FIX release
5. Access DB2/400 database over the Internet
6. delayed disk block allocation
7. AS/400 database to RH 5.1 via NFS question?
8. JumpStart problems installing an Ultra5_10
9. PII 400 dual cpu system wont boot when set to 400
10. Converting AS/400 RPG/400 code
11. X.400 MTA, X.400 Integrator, NetCS-Software
12. Linux on Alpha Station 400 - hardware problems
13. Veritas Database Edition for Oracle 8i in an OPS(Oracle Parallel Server) environment