NIS, NIS+, named, yp, ...

NIS, NIS+, named, yp, ...

Post by Jamie Chamoulos -- Internet.Now » Tue, 11 May 1999 04:00:00

        probably i need more sleep, having said that, im having trouble
configuring named to work right. I think my problem is related to NIS,
that is its not configured right, Im unsure what to put in /etc/domainname
, should that be i think i read that it should not be
associated with your machine name... Im getting. named seems to run ok,
there are no errors in the logs, and it says its started (no errors at the
command line), however when i try nslookup, i get a ypbind error about
host/domain (sorrry, i really should write it down...).


Boss, n.:
        According to the Oxford English Dictionary, in the Middle Ages
the words "boss" and "botch" were largely synonymous, except that boss,
in addition to meaning "a supervisor of workers" also meant "an
ornamental stud."
Generated by /usr/games/fortune

Jamie Chamoulos


1. Reasonable nis security between Solaris & Linux (was Re: Is nis (yp) a security worry?

My original question was basically a "should I worry" concerning Solaris
sending encrypted passwords via nis to PC's running Linux.  The response I
got was that I should worry, e.g. about spoofing and ypcat passwd. The full
answer seems more complicated - ypcat passwd doesn't return the encrypted
passwords (rather "*" or "*NP*") for the two systems I looked at, and the
shadow file isn't in the "compatibility" list for nis+ under Solaris 2 so it
a question of yp make cobbling together the passwd and shadow file information to
make one backwards-compatible yp file.

But all this does seem to depend on the setup, and of course doesn't get me
any closer to some method of getting encrypted password to Linux clients, who
should have at least the level of security of the Solaris host from which the
passwords are kept - i.e. the /etc/shadow file is not world-readable there
so it shouldn't be readable (via ypcat or whatever) on the clients.

This *must* be something people have solved before?  I cannot run nis+ (some
of the clients, such as Linux, Sunos 4.x cannot run that), I cannot run Novell's
NDS on Solaris yet (even though Linux supports it) - besides I'm not sure that
sort of thing is what I want, and being outside the US some security options
are limited anyway.

I am scared of reducing the security of the main system with Linux satellites;
but I appreciate that "reasonable" security is always a compromise, and that
having the encrypted paswords available to Joe User is only a problem if people
choose crackable passwords anyway.  What is appropriate for the situation isn't
ultra-high security anyway, e.g. the main worry would be if academic staff's
home directories were readable (due to their encrypted passwords being distributed
to lots of computers they probably will never use) and therefore having to redo
some exam questions.  Not that I expect the students will try to break the security
but the new Linux systems are a sensitive issue and I don't want people to *fear*
them as a security loophole.

Perhaps the answer is nis 1.2 on the server, with restricted distribution of
all (? or some??) of these passwords to hosts based on IP or subnet. Again, has
anybody done this already and lived to tell the tale?
Mark Aitchison, Physics & Astronomy   \_  Phone : +64 3 3642-947 a.h. 3371-225
University of Canterbury,             </  Fax   : +64 3 3642-469  or  3642-999

#include <disclaimer.std>           (/'

2. Printing unter R5

3. Nis+ and NIS (YP) compatibility

4. Nakamichi MBR-7

5. NIS+ under NIS(YP) Rootmaster or just Master

6. "Lame delegations" - definition wanted

7. NIS yp compat mode, participating in NIS+ hierarchy, limitations?

8. Boot Disk

9. NIS (YP) Master name change...

10. Would NIS+ master work with NIS+ & NIS Slave?????????

11. NIS : auth problem with Linux nis server and SUN sparc nis client

12. NIS+ : Can an HP be a NIS client to a Sun NIS+ server

13. NIS domain names and DNS domain names not matching.