Quote:> > turn reads a config file telling it to use DNS or not) for everything,
> > it can also make direct DNS calls.
In fact there is a 'OI' option in sendmail.cf that controls this. But no
where in the documentation, including the O'Reilly Sendmail book, can I find
a clear explanation of how this works. If including 'OI' means 'use DNS',
does 'no OI' mean 'use resolver(3)'? Obviously the latter is not implied
by the former.
I'm annoyed by not being able to get immediate delivery of mail across a
local LAN using conformant private IP addresses:
------------
| INTERNET |
------------
|
|
| (PPP)
|
|
(158.152.29.162)
------------ (Ethernet) ------------
| LINUX |-------------------------------------------| SUN |
------------ (192.168.0.1) (192.168.0.2) ------------
This Linux box does not do IP forwarding. It runs a caching nameserver
and is primary nameserver for 127.0.0.1 and 'localhost', but it is *NOT*
a nameserver for it's *own* domain - my ISP does that. Mail from the
sun to the linux sits in /var/spool/mqueue until I connect to internet,
even though both the sender and the recipient are on the ethernet.
Omitting the 'OI' does not change this unfortunately.
Quote:> > Yes, setting up a false DNS may be simpler and very useful for the
> > LAN.
> Even if you're connected from time to time with PPP, having a caching-only
> named is useful to avoir unnecessary traffic. Being primary for
> 127.in-addr.arpa. and 255.in-addr.arpa. is useful too.
Yes, indeed, that's exactly what I would like to do. I would like the
linux machine to become authorative over its own internet connected
IP address and its own hostname. None of the FAQs detail how to solve
this, and again, nor does the O'Reilly DNS book.
Can anyone help please?
Alexis
--
FlintOpenroadcyclingPersonaBel&SebastianBeethovenfriezePushRadioragtimeTime
* Alexis Huxley http://www.danae.demon.co.uk/ Life's always blowing *
aloneEnoLinuxRilkeU-klubBeauty!PushSeefeelStarryblueComputerloveLehmannHope