>Perhaps this is too easy, but why not run a good DOS terminal emulator. My
>guess is that you'll have poor performance trying to run X on a 286 anyway.
>And as I remember, a 286 -- that's not heavily loaded -- runs a nice DOS
>teminal app exceptionally well. I can't remember which freeware terminal
>app I ran on mine back in the late 80s, but we dialed into our college shell
>accounts on the thing and it acted like a regular terminal on the ethernet.
>Just my two cents.
Me 'two cents' too! ;-)
URL:http://mvmpc9.ciw.uni-karlsruhe.de/public/uka_ppp/uka_ppp.exe
# Additional software for uka_ppp on mvmpc9
URL:http://mvmpc9.ciw.uni-karlsruhe.de/public/uka_ppp/yarnarc.exe
URL:http://mvmpc9.ciw.uni-karlsruhe.de/public/uka_ppp/minuarc.exe
URL:http://mvmpc9.ciw.uni-karlsruhe.de/public/uka_ppp/lynxarc.exe
URL:http://mvmpc9.ciw.uni-karlsruhe.de/public/uka_ppp/xparc.exe
URL:http://mvmpc9.ciw.uni-karlsruhe.de/public/uka_ppp/bobcat.exe
URL:http://mvmpc9.ciw.uni-karlsruhe.de/public/uka_ppp/arachne.exe
A year ago or so, i hope the URLs still valid.
I have a 286 with 4MB ram running up to a graphical web-browser,
arachne, it works. But i find it to slow on a 286. The other packets
are ok on a 286. (not shure about lynx and 286, bobcat, the smaller
brother of lynx, is ok.) (maybe not yarn with a lot in the spool, but
for mail, ok.)
The packets above inklude some web-browsers, some telnet-clients, ftp of
different brands, mail, an so on.
Works ok on a machine set up with a card and an packet-driver, talking
to a machine running linux.
(there are packet-drivers for null-modem and paralell-cables as well,
it may work, byt then i guess linux must be running plip or slip. I
have not tried. There is a howto.)
I think the packet-driver, and a telnet easily can be placed on a
floppy. _not_ using the uka_ppp frontend. With static ip.
There is also a microsoft tcp/ip thing useful for mounting shares, run
on 286. I dont know if it will run of a floppy, it anyway consumes
much memory, but if, the whole uka_ppp thing could be run diskless.
(or maybe not, if the 'microsoft tcp/ip thing' take the card, it can
not also run the packet driver, maybe a couple of cards will be
needed. And if memory leftover for other aplications get to low. It
may not work. )
(Or mounting C: via a paralell-cable, intersrv/interlnk or maybe
fastlynx. But that demands another machine as disk-server for the
286.)
(both qnx and dos-vnc need a 386 or better, i belive, at least dos-vnc
do. I am not into IPX, what can pcnfs do, i dont know.)
Vidar Andresen