Very Computer

It seems VERY slow to me!  On our Novell net, we get 470K disk
transfer rate across the net.  You should be getting higher than 75%
efficiency of 1.25MBps (10Mbps).  In other words, I think you'd be
getting around 900K/s or more.

Is this just way off-base?

/Brian/
--
--||--||--||--||--||--||--||--||--||--||--||--||--||--||--||--||--
Brian D. Long                                   Vice President ACM
Mississippi College                                      Team OS/2

Thanx!

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Quote:>Just out of curiosity folks..... how does everyone's ethernet connection
>rate in terms of speed? I'm running 1.1.95 (on two machines, one a p5-90,
>the other 486/33) with ne2000 clones using bnc connectors. According to
>tcpspray -n 3000, I get ~470K/sec. This seems slow to me, but I'm not sure.
>Could some of you mail me with your stats for this for comparison purposes?

--

  ____   GCS d-- H- s+:+ !g p?+ au a- w+ v- C+++$ UL++++ US++$ P+>++
  \bi/   L+++ 3 E+ N++ K--- !W--- M-- V-- -po+ Y+ t+ 5+++ jx R G''''
   \/    tv- b+++ D- B--- e- u* h- f+ r n+ y*

The above represents my personal opinions and not necessarily those
of my employer, Qualcomm Inc.

: >Just out of curiosity folks..... how does everyone's ethernet connection
: >rate in terms of speed? I'm running 1.1.95 (on two machines, one a p5-90,
: >the other 486/33) with ne2000 clones using bnc connectors. According to
: >tcpspray -n 3000, I get ~470K/sec. This seems slow to me, but I'm not sure.
: >Could some of you mail me with your stats for this for comparison purposes?

: Well, I don't have tcpspray, but I get 1,000 Kbytes/second transfer
: rate, going from disk cache on a sparc 5 to /dev/null (I'm interested
: in network speeds, not disk speeds) on my 486DX2/66 with an SMC Elite 16.
: That's about 8Mbps, which isn't bad at all for effective throughput on
: an ethernet.

Great... just great. So somethings not kosher. Hmmm. I wonder now how to go
about looking for a cause...

N!
 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -