Has anybody worked on implimenting the pptp that windows NT supports in
4.0b2
for those that are not familiar with this protocol, it is a ip-tunnel
that does encryption on the link to allow a virtual private network over
the internet.
by Kelly Carmichae » Wed, 23 Apr 1997 04:00:00
Has anybody worked on implimenting the pptp that windows NT supports in
4.0b2
for those that are not familiar with this protocol, it is a ip-tunnel
that does encryption on the link to allow a virtual private network over
the internet.
by James Hughe » Wed, 23 Apr 1997 04:00:00
> Has anybody worked on implimenting the pptp that windows NT supports in
> 4.0b2
> for those that are not familiar with this protocol, it is a ip-tunnel
> that does encryption on the link to allow a virtual private network over
> the internet.
--
-James
Hardware, n.:
The parts of a computer system that can be kicked.
1. tunnel point to point vs physical point to point
If you have 2 systems on a point to point link you would address them
by a /30 block? When creating 'gre' tunnel you can use /32 for example
ip addr add 1.0.0.1 peer 1.0.0.2 dev mydev.
why can't /32 of arbitray addressing be used on a point to point
between 2 systems?
2. Update Acorn partition parsing
3. using point-2-point-tunneling protocol on linux
8. Luser!
9. point to point protocol limit of 4 interfaces
10. ppp - point to point protocol on Linux partions
11. Point-to-Point-to-Point-to-Poi