Hello!
Has anyone experience with the pppd2.3b3 under Linux 2.0.29?
I would know how stable it works (no IPX or so, only TCP/IP)....
ciao
Hello!
Has anyone experience with the pppd2.3b3 under Linux 2.0.29?
I would know how stable it works (no IPX or so, only TCP/IP)....
ciao
>Has anyone experience with the pppd2.3b3 under Linux 2.0.29?
>I would know how stable it works (no IPX or so, only TCP/IP)....
>ciao
--
Manuel J. Galan-Moreno
Folks,
We are running a lot of Virtual Hosts on our servers,
Sun Solaris 2.5.1 on Intel and SPARC,
presently at 1.2.4 -- saw the news about 1.3b3, and like the
performance improvement aspects -- didn't see anything at the
apache site which made an upgrade sound "dangerous".
Interested in any feedback from folks who are running
1.3b3? Show we "go for it", or wait for another release.
--
John
___________________________________________________________________
John Murtari Software Workshop Inc.
http://www.thebook.com/
3. Hardware stability (was: Linux stability???)
5. pppd2.2.0f + shlc: still getting "block on freelist isn't free"...
6. fcntl() call
7. Problem using pppd2.2 - KPPP (from KDE) and PPP !!!!!!!
9. telnet problems with pppd2.2.0f and linux kernel 2.0.23
10. Windows-NT 4.0 RAS PPP incompatabilities with PPPD2.2.0f
11. PPPD2.20c and kern1.3.xx fails in NULLMODEM
12. NetBios-IPX-TCP>pppd2.4.-Redhat 5.0
13. repost - 1.2.13 - pppd2.2.0d "mod_use_count" error resolved