Apache Tunning??

Apache Tunning??

Post by Benar » Tue, 21 Jan 1997 04:00:00



Hi!! I decided to set up a apache server.  But I heard we can change
NR_OPEN
from 256 to 1024 and NR_FILE from 1024 to 2048 in the file fs.h .  The
server speed should improve 33% or better.  Is it true?? And why??

_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/

NAME: benard_mak

PAGE: http://136.152.29.54/~benard

_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/

 
 
 

1. FastTrack 3.02 Tunning

Hi,

I have a very busy web site using FastTrack 3.02 running on an SGI Origin
200.  I saw this message from the log [06/Nov/1998:10:30:11] failure: Error
accepting connection -5993 (Too man open files).  I have checked with the
SGI web page on OS tunning and FastTrack tunning but still can't fix my
problem.  So what I do right now is to run apache instead.

In fact I found that the bandwidth consumption different between using
apache and FastTrack is double.  Bandwidth consumption using Apache is 1.5M
while FastTrack is 768K.  Moreover I found that the cpu utilization of
running FastTrack is much higher than Apache.

Please give me some hints because my client want to use FastTrack instead of
Apache.


Cheers,

Bremen

2. IT FINALLY WORKED!!

3. TCP Stack Tunning

4. Q: multiple domain w/ named?

5. Pinnacle PCTV - no channel tunning

6. Linuxer's Hangout Site

7. Good book on DB2 tunning on AIX?

8. Problems w/remote X apps. Please help...

9. performance tunning of openBSD

10. the tunning of linux.

11. Satellite tunning

12. Tunning the jfs cache (buffer cache)

13. Tunning the jfs cache