by Slam » Sat, 30 Jan 1999 04:00:00
by James Nor » Sat, 30 Jan 1999 04:00:00
> Should I upgrade to Samba 2.0? Is it Windows 2000 compatible?
/James
by Slam » Sat, 30 Jan 1999 04:00:00
> > Should I upgrade to Samba 2.0? Is it Windows 2000 compatible?
> I have, works fine although NT5 *refuses* to send plain text passwords
> even after configuring it to do so.
> /James
by Greg Menk » Sat, 30 Jan 1999 04:00:00
> > > Should I upgrade to Samba 2.0? Is it Windows 2000 compatible?
> > I have, works fine although NT5 *refuses* to send plain text passwords
> > even after configuring it to do so.
> > /James
Gregm
by Steve Rus » Sat, 30 Jan 1999 04:00:00
encrypt passwords = yes
in your /etc/smb.conf file and you should be set. Here is a quick copy
of mine if you would like.
Also!!!!!!! Remember to export your /etc/passwd file to
/etc/smbpasswd by running this command.
cat /etc/passwd | mksmbpasswd.sh > /etc/smbpasswd
##### /etc/smb.conf CUT HERE ##################################
workgroup = MYGROUP
wins server = WINSRV
domain controller =WINSRV
domain master = no
os level = 0
#This is for servers with two network cards or IP's. Take this out if
#you have a machine with only a single IP.
interfaces = 206.8.30.10/2 192.168.0.30/24
[global]
encrypt passwords = yes
mangle case = yes
mangled names = yes
default case = lower
case sensitive = no
preserve case = yes
short preserve case = yes
[Ftp]
comment = Share For FTP Files
path = /home/ftp
public = yes
only guest = no
writable = yes
printable = no
[WWW]
comment = Share For WWW Files
path = /home/httpd/html
public = yes
only guest = no
writable = yes
printable = no
valid users = www
######## Done /etc/smb.conf #################
>> So you're saying that I must upgrade to Samba v2.0 for Win2k Pro to see the
>> shares?
>> > > Should I upgrade to Samba 2.0? Is it Windows 2000 compatible?
>> > I have, works fine although NT5 *refuses* to send plain text passwords
>> > even after configuring it to do so.
>> > /James
>I think 1.9 will do encrypted passwords, so it should work. I think its
>the same issue as 95/98/NT password encryption. The man pages and help
>files discuss password encryption issues- and there are references to
>it on the Samba website.
>Gregm
by Coleg » Sun, 31 Jan 1999 04:00:00
Now I have the main showstopper bugs worked out on my system, but there are
still many minor bugs to be worked out.
> encrypt passwords = yes
> in your /etc/smb.conf file and you should be set. Here is a quick copy
> of mine if you would like.
> Also!!!!!!! Remember to export your /etc/passwd file to
> /etc/smbpasswd by running this command.
> cat /etc/passwd | mksmbpasswd.sh > /etc/smbpasswd
> ##### /etc/smb.conf CUT HERE ##################################
> workgroup = MYGROUP
> wins server = WINSRV
> domain controller =WINSRV
> domain master = no
> os level = 0
> #This is for servers with two network cards or IP's. Take this out if
> #you have a machine with only a single IP.
> interfaces = 206.8.30.10/2 192.168.0.30/24
> [global]
> encrypt passwords = yes
> mangle case = yes
> mangled names = yes
> default case = lower
> case sensitive = no
> preserve case = yes
> short preserve case = yes
> [Ftp]
> comment = Share For FTP Files
> path = /home/ftp
> public = yes
> only guest = no
> writable = yes
> printable = no
> [WWW]
> comment = Share For WWW Files
> path = /home/httpd/html
> public = yes
> only guest = no
> writable = yes
> printable = no
> valid users = www
> ######## Done /etc/smb.conf #################
> >> So you're saying that I must upgrade to Samba v2.0 for Win2k Pro to
see the
> >> shares?
> >> > > Should I upgrade to Samba 2.0? Is it Windows 2000 compatible?
> >> > I have, works fine although NT5 *refuses* to send plain text
passwords
> >> > even after configuring it to do so.
> >> > /James
> >I think 1.9 will do encrypted passwords, so it should work. I think its
> >the same issue as 95/98/NT password encryption. The man pages and help
> >files discuss password encryption issues- and there are references to
> >it on the Samba website.
> >Gregm
by Paul » Sun, 31 Jan 1999 04:00:00
Is Win 2000 compatable to anything? You happen to be running beta software and
you shouldnt expect it to work exactly the way it should. Wait for the final
and give it a whirl...or just stick to Unix.
>> > Should I upgrade to Samba 2.0? Is it Windows 2000 compatible?
>> I have, works fine although NT5 *refuses* to send plain text passwords
>> even after configuring it to do so.
>> /James
iQA/AwUBNrPSl0vhaJsm+GAKEQICLACfSnFwgB2WFWsSx9hHIpJyS38UJ70An1hz
g4Z3FRI86POZjWfxjFWgvHDg
=2PIO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
1. Networking Linux Redhat 8.0 & Windows 2000 Pro On Dynamic Based Network
Anyone happen to know where I can find information on networking a Redhat
8.0 machine with a Windows 2000 machine on a network where:
Windows 2000 sees internal LAN fine
Windows 2000 sees outside world fine
Windows 2000 obtains IP address automatically
Windows 2000 obtains DNS server address automatically
DHCP Enabled
In an environment where linux wants to have its own static ip number and
specified domain name, how do i get it to share its hard drive contents with
this windows 2000 machine?
Anyone got any helpful ideas or websites??? Help is much appreciated..
Thomas Jackson
2. Bus Error
3. RedHat 5.2 Doesn't Detect Intel EtherExpress Pro/100 Network Card
5. Can't get ftp on Windows 2000 to work on network connected by Samba
7. SAMBA, SMB I'm lost and so is my windows 2000 machine on linux network
8. Little endian file system dump: Help
9. Windows 2000 Pro and Windows XP Home Networking
10. Redhat 5.2, Windows 2000 and telnet, passwd error
11. Redhat 5.2 on Compaq Proliant 2000 not recongize SCSI contoller
12. Building own computer - for Windows 2000 Pro + Linux