> Any ideas?
Gigabit ethernet cards must autonegotiate if you wish to use them at
gigabit speeds. It is part of the spec (for gigabit copper that is).
So, don't "ever" hardcode a gigabit NIC or switch port.
Now, more broadly for 100BT and autoneg:
How Autoneg is supposed to work:
When both sides of the link are set to autoneg, they will "negotiate"
the duplex setting and select full duplex if both sides can do
full-duplex.
If one side is hardcoded and not using autoneg, the autoneg process
will "fail" and the side trying to autoneg is required by spec to use
half-duplex mode.
If one side is using half-duplex, and the other is using full-duplex,
sorrow and woe is the usual result.
So, the following table shows what will happen given various settings
on each side:
Auto Half Full
Auto Happiness Lucky Sorrow
Half Lucky Happiness Sorrow
Full Sorrow Sorrow Happiness
Happiness means that there is a good shot of everything going well.
Lucky means that things will likely go well, but not because you did
anything correctly :) Sorrow means that there _will_ be a duplex
mis-match.
When there is a duplex mismatch, on the side running half-duplex you
will see various errors and probably a number of late collisions. On
the side running full-duplex you will see things like FCS errors.
Note that those errors are not necessarily conclusive, they are simply
indicators.
Further, it is important to keep in mind that a "clean" ping (or the
like - eg "linkloop") test result is inconclusive here - a duplex
mismatch causes lost traffic _only_ when both sides of the link try to
speak at the same time. A typical ping test, being synchronous, one at
a time request/response, never tries to have both sides talking at the
same time.
rick jones
--
oxymoron n, commuter in a gas-guzzling luxury SUV with an American flag
these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... :)
feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH...