Thanks Erick,
> >via modems quite reasonably whay is there a need to have a digital modem
> >at one end.
> The problem is that a 56k modem needs to have one end terminated by a
> digital trunk. This is not a factor of the modem but the underlying
> phone network. I think that this is the case because downstream
> signals are never analog until they reach the last hop (the line from
> the ISP to the modem), but if you connecting two modems via standard
> phone lines, then the signal is analog more then once (once on the
> upstream to the switch, and again from the switch to the modem) If
> it's a true private network (PBX or similar) then perhaps it would
> work, but I don't have a lot of knowledge of private phone networks.
> But then, if its a private network, why not just run a frame relay
> link or similar?
Frame relay isn't possible as I don't have the control or budget for that, I
am trying to get this working mainly due the fact that I have a 'spare'
internal telephone line that can be dedicated to the task and I heard that
this may be possible. A friend tried a very simple NT (sorry) RAS dial-in
set-up with NT at either end as a proof of concept and the connection seemed
OK. I would like to get both ends running Linux as I hate NT being a Unix
person and I don't want to spend 1,000 on NT licences ! I also have firewall
and IP Masq running well under linux and it would seem a shame to have to use
something else instead. The connection through-put at 56K should be more than
enough as the small LAN only supports 4 users with usual email & web traffic
and an overnight data transfer from the main LAN from the servers on it. Up
to now I had been using an internet connection and ftp/telnet through to the
servers on the main LAN and the costs are getting large !
Quote:> >The dial-in part of the connection and the IP forwarder set-up has me a
> >little foxed as it is difficult to locate guidance notes on it.
> The IP setup is fairly simple. You need to have IP forwarding turned
> on in the kernal.
I take it that this is in BOTH kernels ?
Quote:> Then, your LAN has the IP for the PPP link as the
> default gateway, and on the other system, the PPP link to the net is
> set as the default gateway. For incoming packets, make a route with
> the subnet for the LAN with the gateway as the PPP link back to the
> LAN. I think that should work.
O.K. let me understand:
LAN (Home)
|
[NIC(x.y.110.50) ---- PPP (x.y.110.51)] LAN LINUX SERVER
|
modem
+
+ Private telephone line
+
modem
|
[PPP (x.y.110.236) ----NIC (x.y.110.54)]
REMOTE LINUX SERVER
|
NETWORK
(contains 4 servers I control, I do not control the router out of subnet)
|
NETWORK gateway
(x,y,110,99)
|
INTERNET
The LAN (HOME) default gateway will be (x.x.117.51), at the REMOTE LINUX
SERVER I need to set the default gateway to (x,y,110,99) for the normal
network but I need to also set-up a route to (x,y,110,236). And the REMOTE
LINUX SERVER will have to forward incoming packets back through
(x,y,110,236).
Can you advise what the routing table on each machine should look like ? (And
how to create it ?) Or is there a good text on this sort of thing ?
Thanks,
Dominic Baines