Board index Linux Networking

CCP: timeout sending Config-Requests

CCP: timeout sending Config-Requests

Post by William Grinold » Sat, 27 Feb 1999 04:00:00



Hello all,

Can someone please help me figure this one out?  The error is non-critical,
and my PPP connection works just fine, but this error message bothers me a
little, and I don't know what to do about it.  What does CCP stand
for,anyway?

Feb 23 21:25:35 st-gate pppd[849]: pppd 2.2.0 started by root, uid 0
Feb 23 21:25:35 st-gate pppd[849]: Using interface ppp0
Feb 23 21:25:35 st-gate pppd[849]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS0
Feb 23 21:25:35 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1500>
<magic 0x5e8d2f1a> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 23 21:25:38 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1500>
<magic 0x5e8d2f1a> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 23 21:25:39 st-gate pppd[849]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1500>
<asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x1c8e9f28> <pcomp> <accomp> <auth pap>]
Feb 23 21:25:39 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <mru 1500>
<asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x1c8e9f28> <pcomp> <accomp> <auth pap>]
Feb 23 21:25:41 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1500>
<magic 0x5e8d2f1a> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 23 21:25:42 st-gate pppd[849]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <mru 1500>
<magic 0x5e8d2f1a> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 23 21:25:42 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [PAP AuthReq id=0x1 user="xxxxxxxx"
password="xxxxxxxx"]
Feb 23 21:25:42 st-gate pppd[849]: rcvd [PAP AuthAck
id=0x1msg="LoginSucceeded"]
Feb 23 21:25:42 st-gate pppd[849]: Remote message: Login Succeeded
Feb 23 21:25:42 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <addr 0.0.0.0>
<compress VJ 0f 01>]
Feb 23 21:25:42 st-gate pppd[849]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <compress VJ 0f
00> <addr 206.127.1.33>]
Feb 23 21:25:42 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [IPCP ConfAck id=0x1 <compress VJ 0f
00> <addr 206.127.1.33>]
Feb 23 21:25:42 st-gate pppd[849]: rcvd [IPCP ConfNak id=0x1 <addr
209.99.49.193>]
Feb 23 21:25:42 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x2 <addr
209.99.49.193> <compress VJ 0f 01>]
Feb 23 21:25:42 st-gate diald[828]: New addresses: local 209.99.49.193,
remote 206.127.1.33.Feb 23 21:25:42 st-gate pppd[849]: rcvd [IPCP ConfAck
id=0x2 <addr 209.99.49.193> <compress VJ 0f 01>]
Feb 23 21:25:42 st-gate pppd[849]: local  IP address 209.99.49.193
Feb 23 21:25:42 st-gate pppd[849]: remote IP address 206.127.1.33
Feb 23 21:25:42 st-gate pppd[849]: rcvd [CCP ConfReq id=0x1 < 11 05 00 01
04>]
Feb 23 21:25:42 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x1]
Feb 23 21:25:42 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [CCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 11 05 00 01
04>]
Feb 23 21:25:42 st-gate pppd[849]: rcvd [CCP ConfReq id=0x2 < 11 05 00 01
03>]
Feb 23 21:25:42 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [CCP ConfRej id=0x2 < 11 05 00 01
03>]
Feb 23 21:25:43 st-gate pppd[849]: rcvd [CCP ConfReq id=0x3 < 11 05 00 00
00>]
Feb 23 21:25:43 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [CCP ConfRej id=0x3 < 11 05 00 00
00>]
Feb 23 21:25:43 st-gate pppd[849]: rcvd [CCP ConfReq id=0x4 < 12 06 00 00
0001>]
Feb 23 21:25:43 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [CCP ConfRej id=0x4 < 12 06 00 00
0001>]
Feb 23 21:25:45 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x1]
Feb 23 21:25:46 st-gate pppd[849]: rcvd [CCP TermReq id=0x6]
Feb 23 21:25:46 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [CCP TermAck id=0x6]
Feb 23 21:25:48 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x1]
Feb 23 21:25:48 st-gate pppd[849]: rcvd [CCP TermReq id=0x0]
Feb 23 21:25:48 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [CCP TermAck id=0x0]
Feb 23 21:25:51 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x1]
Feb 23 21:25:51 st-gate pppd[849]: rcvd [CCP TermReq id=0x0]
Feb 23 21:25:51 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [CCP TermAck id=0x0]
Feb 23 21:25:54 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x1]
Feb 23 21:25:54 st-gate pppd[849]: rcvd [CCP TermReq id=0x0]
Feb 23 21:25:54 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [CCP TermAck id=0x0]
Feb 23 21:25:57 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x1]
Feb 23 21:25:57 st-gate pppd[849]: rcvd [CCP TermReq id=0x0]
Feb 23 21:25:57 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [CCP TermAck id=0x0]
Feb 23 21:26:00 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x1]
Feb 23 21:26:00 st-gate pppd[849]: rcvd [CCP TermReq id=0x0]
Feb 23 21:26:00 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [CCP TermAck id=0x0]
Feb 23 21:26:03 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x1]
Feb 23 21:26:03 st-gate pppd[849]: rcvd [CCP TermReq id=0x0]
Feb 23 21:26:03 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [CCP TermAck id=0x0]
Feb 23 21:26:06 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x1]
Feb 23 21:26:06 st-gate pppd[849]: rcvd [CCP TermReq id=0x0]
Feb 23 21:26:06 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [CCP TermAck id=0x0]
Feb 23 21:26:09 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x1]
Feb 23 21:26:09 st-gate pppd[849]: rcvd [CCP TermReq id=0x0]
Feb 23 21:26:09 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [CCP TermAck id=0x0]
Feb 23 21:26:12 st-gate pppd[849]: CCP: timeout sending Config-Requests

Thanks,
Bill

 
 
 
Top

CCP: timeout sending Config-Requests

Post by Clifford Ki » Sat, 27 Feb 1999 04:00:00


: Hello all,

: Can someone please help me figure this one out?  The error is non-critical,
: and my PPP connection works just fine, but this error message bothers me a
: little, and I don't know what to do about it.  What does CCP stand
: for,anyway?

Compression Control Protocol.  The ISP requests a few flavors of STAC
and then Microsoft Point-to-Point compression, both are propriatary
and pppd can't do them.  Not serious as you observed.  The pppd option
-bsdcomp *may* get rid of it.  There is a noccp option in ppp-2.3.5 that
*should* get rid of it.

The ISP PPP implementation is slightly broken - not uncommon - and
doesn't know how to properly terminate the CCP negotiations when pppd
rejects all that it offers.

<snip>

: Feb 23 21:26:09 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [CCP TermAck id=0x0]
: Feb 23 21:26:12 st-gate pppd[849]: CCP: timeout sending Config-Requests

--

/* The wealth of a nation is created by the productive labor of its
 * citizens. */

 
 
 
Top

CCP: timeout sending Config-Requests

Post by William Grinold » Tue, 16 Mar 1999 04:00:00


Thanks for your response and for putting my mind at ease.  I'm currently
using pppd version 2.2, and I see nothing in the man pages about -bsdcomp.
Oh well - I'll just live with it.  :-)  Thanks again.

Bill


>Compression Control Protocol.  The ISP requests a few flavors of STAC
>and then Microsoft Point-to-Point compression, both are propriatary
>and pppd can't do them.  Not serious as you observed.  The pppd option
>-bsdcomp *may* get rid of it.  There is a noccp option in ppp-2.3.5 that
>*should* get rid of it.

>The ISP PPP implementation is slightly broken - not uncommon - and
>doesn't know how to properly terminate the CCP negotiations when pppd
>rejects all that it offers.

><snip>

>: Feb 23 21:26:09 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [CCP TermAck id=0x0]
>: Feb 23 21:26:12 st-gate pppd[849]: CCP: timeout sending Config-Requests

 
 
 
Top

1. CCP: timeout sending Config-Requests

What causes "CCP: timeout sending Config-Requests" with a PPP/CHAP
connection?  It doesn't appear to be a serious problem.

(kernel 2.1.101, ppp 2.3.5)

  May 16 22:52:21 tostitos pppd[29690]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
  May 16 22:52:28 tostitos pppd[29690]: Remote message: Login Succeeded
  May 16 22:52:28 tostitos pppd[29690]: local  IP address 166.55.240.220
  May 16 22:52:28 tostitos pppd[29690]: remote IP address 166.55.64.205
  May 16 22:52:59 tostitos pppd[29690]: CCP: timeout sending Config-Requests

2. Best NT based NFS Server Software?

3. Error: CCP: timeout sending Config-Requests / route command hangs

4. Why i can't run linux on my iBook 500?

5. Jul 4 12:28:32 sisterray pppd[1669]: CCP: timeout sending Config-Requests

6. Best way-Kernel notify User (DMA)

7. CCP: timeout sending Config-Requests (log included)

8. Good laptop platforms for liunux?

9. CCP: timeout sending config requests

10. pppd: CCP: timeoute sending Config-Requests

11. LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests - more info

12. pppd fails with: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests

13. Rehat 4.0 ppp: "LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests"


All times are UTC
Board index